Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
The EditorsSeptember 01, 2016

When Apple refused to help the F.B.I. hack into the iPhone of a shooter in the attack last December in San Bernardino, both sides claimed their actions defended the common good. Apple warned that intentionally breaking their own software would put the safety and privacy of millions of their customers at risk. The government said that not accessing the phone to gather more intelligence would put the public at risk. They also claimed they could be trusted with secret backdoors into software and devices—that is, special access that makes systems, including those of private companies, vulnerable. The tech world was not so optimistic.

In August, a highly sensitive toolkit of exploits—taking advantage of previously unknown vulnerabilities—held by the National Security Agency was leaked. Apple was right.

To be sure, intelligence gathering and data collection are important tools for law enforcement, but they also require strong checks and balances. The leaked N.S.A. exploits have compromised the security of widely used network equipment found in our offices and schools. The privacy and safety of U.S. citizens are no longer just in the hands of the N.S.A.; malicious hackers and foreign governments can join the surveillance party. There are very few binding guidelines for the use and reporting of new vulnerabilities and hacks. When the N.S.A., whose mission includes not only intelligence and surveillance but also information security, discovers new vulnerabilities, it does not have to inform hardware or software makers. Without strong rules for reporting technological vulnerabilities to hardware and software makers, the government is failing to truly protect the common good.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Lisa Weber
8 years 7 months ago
Big Brother comes to us through our phones. This is not reassuring.

The latest from america

The people of God see the bishop of Rome as a teacher, but they also unquestionably see him as a father.
J.D. Long GarcíaMay 01, 2025
Since the death of Pope Francis, lists of his possible successors have proliferated on social media and in newspapers. Should you trust them?
Colleen DulleMay 01, 2025
A Homily for the Third Sunday of Easter, by Terrance Klein
Terrance KleinApril 30, 2025
In a pre-conclave meeting, an Italian cardinal, and backer of Cardinal Parolin as next pope, attacked Pope Francis for opening positions of responsibility in the church to men and women not in holy orders.
Gerard O’ConnellApril 30, 2025