Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Jim McDermottJanuary 06, 2016

If you’re living in Los Angeles and happened to be on Twitter yesterday, it would be hard not to notice that #ElNiño was trending. We had over an inch and a third of rain yesterday—I know that doesn't sound like much, but it is more than the city had any day in 2015 except for Sept. 15, when we got what was left of Mexico’s Hurricane Linda. And the forecasts have been for rains to continue all week—and perhaps intermittently for the next two or three months. 

On the surface that sounds like a good thing. After years of drought, if there is one thing California needs, it’s rain.

The paradox is, we are not really made for rain out here. The ground here doesn’t hold much water, which leads to quick flooding and mudslides. Local cities have been stockpiling sand bags and cleaning out storm drains for some time. Even so, in Hollywood yesterday there were streets with large puddles almost immediately after the rains began. Avenues and even three freeways flooded. 

It is less one heavy rain that could cause real problems, though, than the possibility of an ongoing series of smaller storms, wearing away at the ever-more water-soaked hills, turning small mudslides into what climatologist Bill Patzert told the L.A. Times could be “mudflows [of] 2 to 3 feet in height.” Current predictions suggest Los Angeles will get two to three inches of rain by Friday, which is as much as downtown Los Angeles usually gets in the entire month.

And the real danger is probably later in the winter. This El Niño is predicted to be one of the three strongest in the last 50 years. Both of the others caused over $500 million in damage here. In February of 1998, Los Angeles got almost 14 inches of rain, which is the Southern California version of "a very bad sign." Seriously, there were people in Pasadena building boats.

Temporary shelters have been opened to support the city’s large homeless population, adding up to 1,131 beds to the 2,000 already in place. But bureaucracy being by nature inhuman, the locations of the temporary shelters can only be discovered by calling 2-1-1 or going to a city website so as to prevent walkups. The idea may be to prevent any one shelter from overcrowding; even so, it’s a bit of a mixed message. Come get out of the rain; but please don't come unannounced. 

When it comes to precipitation, Angelenos are easily excited. A gentle misting is classified as a “storm.” At just the threat of rain people refuse to drive. (It’s true. Freeways are always clearer on rainy days. Barring the accidents, of course.) Meteorologists’ news reports become soliloquies equal parts anxiety and adoration.

But at the same time, this is still Los Angeles. People here know hype when they see it. It takes more to be impressed.

Wait and see, bruh. Wait and see. 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
JR Cosgrove
9 years 4 months ago
For a discussion on how California has made its own bed on water distribution and exacerbated the situation read an assessment by a man born in the Central Valley: http://victorhanson.com/wordpress/?p=8890
Chuck Kotlarz
9 years 1 month ago
Near the end of the article the writer notes, “Redistribution, not expansion of supplies, is the liberal creed for water, just as it is for wealth.” An excellent analogy…billionaires are drowning in wealth and main street is in a forty-year drought.

The latest from america

That is the question ghosts really should be made to answer: Why remain where you have been most miserable?
Terrance KleinMay 07, 2025
black smoke emerges from the sistine chapel on the first day of the conclave, the sky is a dark blue at 9 pm Rome time
As expected, the 133 cardinals who entered the Sistine Chapel May 7 failed to elect the next pope on their first ballot.
Now that the 133 cardinal electors are ensconced in the Sistine Chapel to elect a successor to Pope Francis, some potential candidates have come to the fore.
Gerard O’ConnellMay 07, 2025
When else do we get an opportunity like this, to take someone at this level of leadership at face value?
Molly CahillMay 07, 2025