Just returned from a preview of Book of Eli. (Thank you, Grace Hill Media.) The story: A superfast, supersensitive Denzel Washington wanders through post-apocalyptic USA, trying to shepherd the last remaining Bible to a place where it will make a difference. (Note to the writer: the developing (i.e. likely to be overlooked in case of a nuclear war) parts of the world actually have Bibles, too.)
Flash Review — Some fantastic action sequences — remind me never to get in another bar fight with D.W. (“Another”: long story.) A captivating world. And it’s Denzel — so of course he’s come to save the world (and the movie).
But just enough religion to make people say it’s “religious”, and not enough to actually mean anything (i.e. to make you think about the way you live your life). And the red pill: “redemptive violence”. Not since the book of Joshua have so many people been killed to get God’s work done. In Denzel’s hands it goes down smooth, (as does quite a plot point…), but when the flick’s over, you might wonder whether that was actually Kool-Aid you just drank.
Ranking: 2 Mad Maxes out of four.
Jim McDermott, S.J.
popculturepriest.tumblr.com
The Book of Eli
Show Comments (
)
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
The latest from america
The conclave that begins next Wednesday to elect a successor for Pope Francis is the first in 46 ½ years for which the Vatican hasn’t ordered a set of cassocks from the two best-known papal tailors.
Papabile: How do conclave watchers come up with their lists of the next pope—and should we trust them?
The people of God see the bishop of Rome as a teacher, but they also unquestionably see him as a father.
Since the death of Pope Francis, lists of his possible successors have proliferated on social media and in newspapers. Should you trust them?