I resisted posting this for a few days. It's absolutely brilliant but has some blue language up front. So yesterday I consulted with two of our editors, who said, "Are you kidding? Post it!" Anyway, cover your ears early on, but enjoy this fantastic parody of the kind of lazy journalism that you often see on these kinds of spots. (H/t David Gibson at Dotcommonweal).
Breaking News
Show Comments ()
2
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Kevin Jam
15 years 2 months ago
So funny!
Maria Salazar
15 years 2 months ago
Brillian. Simply brilliant. I remember being in college journalism class poking fun at the broadcast types for reasons very much like shown in this clip.
The latest from america
The conclave that begins next Wednesday to elect a successor for Pope Francis is the first in 46 ½ years for which the Vatican hasn’t ordered a set of cassocks from the two best-known papal tailors.
Papabile: How do conclave watchers come up with their lists of the next pope—and should we trust them?
The people of God see the bishop of Rome as a teacher, but they also unquestionably see him as a father.
Since the death of Pope Francis, lists of his possible successors have proliferated on social media and in newspapers. Should you trust them?