'Tale of two synods' emerged from Vatican, says USCCB president

October's extraordinary Synod of Bishops on the family was just one event, but "a tale of two synods" emerged from it, according to the president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Speaking to reporters Nov. 10 after the morning session of the USCCB's annual fall general assembly in Baltimore, Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz of Louisville, Kentucky, acknowledged the differences in the synod experienced by the bishops participating in it and news accounts disseminated outside the synod.

Advertisement

Those differences were highlighted by Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York in remarks delivered during the assembly's morning session.

"There must have been two synods," he said, and the participating U.S. bishops "happened to be at the wrong one."

From what he said he had heard and read about the synod, one synod was "confrontational and divisive," "hijacked by left-wing dissenters intent on eluding doctrine," with proceedings "smothered by new Ottavianis, dug in to resist the fresh breeze" of change, Cardinal Dolan said, referring to Italian Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani known for his opposition to the changes being brought about in the church during the Second Vatican Council.

"Too bad we missed that one," Cardinal Dolan added. "The one we were at was hardly as spicy (and) juicy."

The synod Cardinal Dolan said he attended "was a synod of consensus. This synod was led by a pope with a radical charism for attentive listening," he said of Pope Francis, adding the only time the pope spoke was in "reciting the Angelus -- twice."

At this synod, "we listened to married couples who found God's love in one another and their kids," Cardinal Dolan said. "At this synod, we listened to bishops form Africa who said the (church's) teaching on marriage, so widely dismissed in the First World, was enhancing their culture. ... We saw brother bishops asking how we can expedite and simplify marriage (annulment) cases."

It was at this synod, Cardinal Dolan said, that "life-giving marriage" was the focus of "meeting the most urgent vocation crisis of the times."

Archbishop Kurtz, in addressing his fellow bishops, noted that each one of the 62 paragraphs that constituted the final "relatio," or report, of the synod met with majority approval -- and all but three of the paragraphs with approval by at least two-thirds of those voting.

Cardinal Donald W. Wuerl of Washington, at a news conference following the morning session, said Pope Francis had asked that the "votation" be published along with the text to indicate the degree of accord shared at the synod.

Archbishop Kurtz said there were 12 documents in all to be considered at the synod before the final "relatio" was discussed: the first two "relatios" -- one offered at the synod's beginning and a second draft issued mid-synod -- plus separate documents produced by each of 10 small working groups.

"The work of the second 'relatio' was the work of the small groups," Archbishop Kurtz told reporters.

Cardinal Wuerl added that press covering the synod and those bishops participating in it "have different perspectives."

"So many people tend to reflect now in terms of sound bites," he said. "In the church, we're learning to speak a little more crisply, but our teaching is not reducible to sound bites."

He noted it took some time for the final "relatio" to be translated into English from the official Italian. But he urged the bishops to wait for the translation, noting that the final "relatio" serves as the "lineamenta," or outline, for next year's world Synod of Bishops.

Archbishop Kurtz said the Vatican was holding a meeting later in November to construct a system of reflection for bishops' conferences to use in seeking input from dioceses to be used in preparation for next year's synod.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Tim O'Leary
3 years 11 months ago
The confusion relating to the interim Relatio was not just the fault of the media, but had inside help. However, I agree that preconceptions in the outside world color nearly everything that is said, and can distort the true message. There is a very significant meeting at the Vatican next week that should get a lot of attention because it is also about the family but includes speakers from many faiths (Protestant, Morman, Jewish & Muslim). And Pope Francis will be there, giving opening remarks. Archbishop Chaput is also a speaker, along with several Cardinals and Archbishops. Here is the link.http://www.humanum.it/en/videos.html (beautiful videos). The conference title is: An International Interreligious Colloquium on The Complementarity of Man and Woman

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018