Supreme Court seems increasingly wary on death penalty

The Supreme Court—the last stop for condemned prisoners such as Scott Panetti, a Texan who is mentally ill—appears increasingly wary of the death penalty.

In May, the justices blocked the execution of a Missouri murderer because his medical condition made it likely that he would suffer from a controversial lethal injection.

Advertisement

Later that month, the court ruled 5-4 that Florida must apply a margin of error to IQ tests, thereby making it harder for states to execute those with borderline intellectual disabilities.

In September, a tipping point on lethal injections was nearly reached when four of the nine justices sought to halt a Missouri prisoner’s execution because of the state’s use of a drug that had resulted in botched executions elsewhere.

And in October, the court stopped the execution of yet another Missouri man over concerns that his lawyers were ineffective and had missed a deadline for an appeal. The justices are deciding whether to hear that case in full.

Now, on top of drug protocols, developmental disabilities and attorneys’ mistakes, the court must decide in Panetti’s case whether mental illness should be another reason to keep prisoners alive.

“There’s frustration on the part of at least some of the justices about the death penalty, and what to do about it,” said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center.

At least three justices—Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito—consistently vote against blocking state executions. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy usually line up with them.

The court’s four liberals—Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan—have shown the most hesitation or opposition. Ginsburg said in September that capital punishment cases have been the “most troubling” of her 21-year career on the court.

Kennedy joined the liberals in May, writing the court’s opinion in Hall v. Florida that struck down overly rigid IQ test requirements. “Intellectual disability is a condition, not a number,” Kennedy wrote.

While the court has yet to hear a case on the ethics of lethal injections, it has moved toward the liberals’ position in recent years on issues of mental capacity.

In Atkins v. Virginia (2002), the court ruled 6-3 that executing people with intellectual disabilities violated their Eighth Amendment rights against cruel and unusual punishment. This year’s ruling in Freddie Lee Hall’s case fine-tuned that decision.

In Roper v. Simmons (2005), the court ruled 5-4 that juveniles who were under age 18 when they committed their crimes are not eligible for the death penalty. It since has limited the use of life without parole for juvenile offenders as well.

The court’s precedent on mental illness dates back to 1986, when it ruled in Ford v. Wainwright that prisoners must be deemed mentally competent before being executed. Determining competency was left up to the states, however.

“It’s difficult to define mental illness, whereas it’s easier to define mental retardation and quantify it,” Dieter says. “Mental illness is one area where they could really open up a whole new exemption.”

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.

Advertisement

The latest from america

I have found myself for the first time truly afraid of what it means to ask and to allow my children to be part of the church.
Kerry WeberAugust 15, 2018
Cardinal William H. Keeler in May 2009. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz) 
A Pennsylvania report accuses Keeler of covering up sexual abuse allegations while serving as bishop of Harrisburg.
Associated PressAugust 15, 2018
With her appeal to emotion, Gadsby reminds audiences to see the vulnerable, resilient human being behind the humiliated stand-up comic.
Allyson EscobarAugust 15, 2018
Boston Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley and Deacon Bernie Nojadera, executive director of the U.S. bishops' Secretariat for Child and Youth Protection, are pictured during the 2017 Catholic convocation in Orlando, Fla.  (CNS photo/Bob Roller)
“Our first job is to listen, to be empathetic,” said Deacon Bernie Nojadera, the executive director of the U.S. bishops’ Secretariat for the Protection of Children and Young People.