Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Matt Malone, S.J.June 24, 2015

The late Cardinal Avery Dulles, S.J., a frequent contributor to these pages, is remembered in more scholarly circles for his most famous work, Models of the Church, a postconciliar examination of the principal ways in which Catholics describe the essential identity of the church. The “models” are six different answers to the questions “what is the church and what is its primary purpose?” Cardinal Dulles acknowledged that his models were simplified descriptions and could not “do full justice to the complexities of individual positions.” Nevertheless, he thought his method was useful because it identified “the issues and choices to be made and the theoretical implications of pure positions.” Cardinal Dulles, then, was not so much holding up a mirror to the church as holding up a particular kind of mirror, one that distorts the subject and yet still reveals something meaningful, much like what happens when we stand in front a mirror in a fun house.

The book came along at just the right time. In the wake of the Second Vatican Council, people were asking big questions about the nature of the church. That makes sense; in Catholic theology, ecclesiology is destiny. What the church should do and how we should be in the world, in other words, will be guided in large part by who we understand ourselves to be as a church. Thus Cardinal Dulles also applied his models to an examination of five different ways of understanding the sacrament of holy orders.

The first model of holy orders, according to Cardinal Dulles, is the clerical model: “Ministry is performed by those who have authority to impose beliefs and give commands in the name of Christ.” In this model, ministry is primarily juridical in nature, especially at the episcopal level. The second model is that of pastor. The accent here is less on objective ex officio authority and more on the subjective charism of ecclesial leaders. The third model is the “mediatory” model: through the sacrament of ordination, a class of persons is “set apart for the sacred ministry” in order to mediate an experience of God, especially in the Mass. The fourth model is that of preacher, the one charged with proclaiming the “faith, repentance and reform” envisioned by the Gospel. The final model envisions the church as servant and the priest as an organizer who encourages “coalitions dedicated to the promotion of peace and justice.”

Cardinal Dulles’s framework provides a useful roadmap for this week’s cover story. “The fullness of the sacrament of Holy Orders,” said the fathers of the Second Vatican Council, “is conferred by episcopal consecration.” Our understanding of what a bishop is, in other words, depends in large measure on what we think a deacon or a priest is. But there is another reason why Cardinal Dulles’s methodology is useful. In the spirit of the classic “both/and” methodology of Catholic theology, one that resists false choices, a robust understanding of priesthood and episcopal service will most likely incorporate elements from each of the five models. It is equally true that an overemphasis on one particular model, to the exclusion of the others, will likely distort and impoverish our understanding of ministry.

This was Cardinal Dulles’s view, at any rate. His preferred symbol of priesthood was that of the Good Shepherd, the one who governs but also serves his flock. Most important, however, the Good Shepherd loves his flock and must be ready to give his life in deeds as well as words: “The shepherd, as the Gospels tell us,” Cardinal Dulles wrote, “must have a deep love for the sheep, know them intimately, lead them toward good pastures, defend them, and go out in search of those who stray from the fold.” I suspect that Pope Francis would completely agree.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Lisa Weber
9 years 4 months ago
I have a great respect for the good that priests are able to do in the world if they choose to. Examining the role of priests and bishops does not address the questions that most concern me. Those questions might be summed up by asking "What is the role of women leaders in the church and what good are we missing by neglecting to develop that role?"
Charles McNamee
9 years 3 months ago
I had the great fortune to hear Father Dulles deliver a talk on the Magisterium at SLU in 1969. It was great and cleared up many misconceptions held by many Catholics in post Vat II years. At that time, many saw the Magisterium the way many Republicans now view the Administration in Washington. To my simple (simplistic??) way of thinking, the Church was intended to proclaim the "good news" of Jesus; his life, teachings, deeds, death and Resurrection to generations of those blessed to hear it. But exactly what the good news was is sometimes confusing. To us today, the good news is the news about Jesus, his life etc.. and theological (conceptual) dogmas concerning who he is and what his relationship to the Father is, and what the Holy Spirit is, and who Mary, his mother, is and what truths can be conceived about the Liturgical, Moral, Sacramental and organizational matters about our Church. That is the "good news" according to the Church. But from the earliest sources we have, Jesus' own "good news" was not about himself, but about the Kingdom of God and its whereabouts. In the earliest of the four Gospels, we read: "Jesus came into Galilee proclaiming the 'good news' from God, saying,' The present moment is the right time, change the way you think for the Kingdom of God is WITHIN you, believe this 'good news'" [Mk. 1:15-16] Thus the good news is about the indwelling of God. This is the heart of Jesus' teaching, which answered the question of mankind for hundreds of thousands of years, "Just WHERE is this so called God?" This primal truth of revelation should be paramount in every believer in Jesus. Thus especially, the priest should live this truth in his prayer, in his thoughts and speech, in his every deed and especially how he treats his flock, in whom God also indwells. He doesn't have to change the world for the better except by his living this present moment with that good news conscious in him as shepherd of his (ie., Jesus' ) flock.

The latest from america

I am rather fond of my native land and her robust and quirky republican traditions, but Jesus did not preach democracy nor endorse any particular political philosophy.
Anthony R. Lusvardi, S.J.November 13, 2024
What are our young people learning? What will we do as people of faith to actively mitigate suffering? And, finally, what about the future?
Cecilia González-AndrieuNovember 13, 2024
A brushfire on a hill threatens a row of single-family homes, below, in Southern California. (iStock/f00sion)
We have recently seen entire communities wiped off the map by wildfires fueled by ever-hotter weather. This has grave implications for tradition, family and other goods that social conservatives value.
Joshua L. SohnNovember 13, 2024
Pilgrims coming to Rome will now have the opportunity to experience St. Peter’s Basilica like never before.