Of Many Things

A mere 100 years ago this summer, miscalculation and madness brought forth the War to End All Wars, the first of the 20th century’s twin cataclysms and humankind’s gruesome introduction to total warfare on a global scale. In the opinion of Europe’s intelligentsia at the time, it was not supposed to have happened. As Barbara Tuchman points out in The Guns of August, her masterly account of the initial months of World War I, enlightenment values and liberal economics, it was thought, had rendered war passé, irrational, even impossible.

During the years just before the war, the runaway international bestseller, translated into 11 languages, had been Norman Angell’s The Great Illusion, which, according to Tuchman, “‘proved’ that in the present financial and economic interdependence of nations, the victor would suffer equally with the vanquished; therefore war had become unprofitable; therefore, no nation would be so foolish as to start one.”

Advertisement

The problem with Angell’s argument was that its premise, that the decision whether to wage war is primarily a rational, political or economic choice, was and remains false. Still, a descendant of this argument can be found today among those pushing the benefits of globalization. An interdependent world in which we buy iPads composed of parts assembled from a dozen or more countries and supported by customer service agents tens of thousands of miles from our living rooms, it is thought, will produce a safer world because any act of aggression would injure the aggressor as much as it might injure the victim.

Yet while politics and economics are undoubtedly essential motivations in nearly all war-making, the horrendous reality of war antedates the nation-state and the market economy in all but their most primordial historical forms. This suggests that there is something almost innate in our drive to kill and conquer, which likely has more to do with original sin than it does with entangled alliances, or Lenin’s theory of imperialism, or McKinley’s manifest destiny, or Bush’s doctrine of preventive war.

If that is the case, if the sin of Adam and Eve explains why Cain killed Abel and better explains why the Kaiser set out for Paris, then this much is also true: war is never a straightforward rational exercise, for sin, original or otherwise, is by definition irrational, separating us as it does from God, the source and summit of life itself, without whom there is no reason, no freedom, no hope. Peace, therefore, requires far more than an equilibrium of self-interests. It requires the radical conversion of sinful human hearts, our subsequent forgiveness of others’ sins, even the most barbarous, and the ultimate reconciliation of all humanity through the grace of God.

Tuchman reminds us that after the First Battle of the Marne in early September 1914, a bloody stalemate ensued, and “the nations were caught in a trap from which there was, and has been, no escape.” In my Good Friday moments, when the world as it is seems so hopelessly far from what it is meant to be; when, as Winston Churchill wrote of the summer of 1914, “the terrible ifs accumulate,” I sometimes wonder whether escape is even possible.

An Easter faith tells me that it is, reminds me that while human beings may be deprived by virtue of original sin, we are not depraved, that there is much in humanity that is noble and true and good. In my Easter moments, I dare to hope that the essential goodness of humanity may yet prevail, that my brothers’ sons, unlike their great-grandfather, who fought in the inaptly named Great War, may know the true peace that the Prince of Peace wills for us all.

Note: An earlier version of this column appeared in the issue of July 20, 2009.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Bruce Snowden
3 years 5 months ago
Great synopsis on the "whys?" of "wars and rumors of wars." In his usual bright, succinct way, Fr. Malone says it well, humanity is "deprived" (through original sin) but not "depraved." Interpreted by me mundanely it means, learn to cope, live in hope. In a word, don't be a DOPE!.
David Smith
3 years 4 months ago
Interesting. I've just started reading The Guns of August - both Amazon and Audible. Fascinating how politically complex Europe was back then. My father was in Luxembourg in that war - in what I suppose would have been the German center. Call it original sin or simply biological disposition, hatred and violence do seem an essential part of the human creature. We're strongly emotional animals, with a thin rational overlay. Logically, I suppose, we shouldn't be around for much longer, since the rational piece of us has invented multiple ways for small groups or individuals to kill millions of others. All it takes is just a little madness, and there's plenty of that around. That poison was contained by a few large powers for nearly half a century, but the genie is now out of its bottle and whispering in many ears. Arthur C. Clarke wrote a thoughtful and hopeful parable in Childhood's End, in which humanity is midwifed into a higher state, in which, we can guess, the dross is left behind and only the pure metal goes forward. One could, I suppose, pray for something like that. The creature we are now seems fatally flawed.
MaryMargaret Flynn
3 years 4 months ago
Here it is again--the concept "original sin". I would like to ask Father Malone and anyone who comments, what is "orginal sin". I just don't believe such a "thing" exists and so using the term empties the article of a main point. What does "original sin" mean in the 21st century. I know the concept and some of its history but don't know why it is still current.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

A reflection for the third Monday of Advent
Elizabeth Kirkland CahillDecember 17, 2017
25,000 children and pilgrim sang the pope “Happy Birthday" today in St. Peter’s Square.
Gerard O’ConnellDecember 17, 2017
A reflection for the third Sunday of Advent
Elizabeth Kirkland CahillDecember 16, 2017
Homeless people are seen in Washington June 22. Bishop Frank J. Dewane of Venice, Fla., chair of the U.S. bishops' domestic policy committee, released a statement Nov. 17 proclaiming that the House of Representatives "ignored impacts to the poor and families" in passing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act the previous day. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)
The United States is thwarting the advancement of millions of its citizens, a UN rapporteur says.
Kevin ClarkeDecember 16, 2017