Of Many Things

Pope Benedict XVI’s announcement on Feb. 11 that he will “renounce the ministry of Bishop of Rome” stunned the church and set the media scrambling. America was no exception; we were equally surprised and just as frenzied. In the 48 hours after the news broke, our editors gave more than two-dozen interviews to the secular press.

Providing commentary and assistance to the media in times such as these is an important part of America’s mission to interpret the church for the world and the world for the church. America’s editor at large, James Martin, S.J., made several media appearances, including one on “The Colbert Report,” the satirical news program on Comedy Central hosted by Stephen Colbert, the actor and comedian who plays a dangerously dimwitted, reactionary version of himself on the weekly program.


Also appearing on the show that night was Garry Wills, a onetime Jesuit and protégé of William F. Buckley Jr., who has moved steadily leftward over the course of his Pulitzer prize-winning career. Mr. Wills has just published a new book, the thesis of which is easily gleaned from its title, Why Priests? A Failed Tradition.

Mr. Colbert asked the author why the priesthood is a failed tradition. Mr. Wills responded: “Well, they continue to pretend to turn bread and wine into the body and blood of Jesus, which doesn’t happen.” When Mr. Colbert mentioned that the Eucharist is “a mystery,” Mr. Wills responded: “No, it’s a fake.” A very awkward three-second pause ensued.

Some longtime watchers of the show noticed that a shocked Mr. Colbert, a devout Catholic in real life, nearly broke character. But Mr. Wills wasn’t finished: In the remaining two minutes of the interview, he went on to say that the priesthood and the papacy should be abolished and that the sacrament of the sick is “an invented sacrament.”

Now it should be obvious to even the most casual Roman Catholic that Mr. Wills’s views are definitely heterodox and probably heretical. I don’t use that last term in a desultory fashion. In fact, the word heresy is too casually invoked in popular ecclesiastical discourse. I am personally loath to say that any person—liberal, conservative, whatever—is or is not a Christian solely because of his or her theological beliefs.

But it is not really Mr. Wills’s unorthodox views that give us cause to question his Christian commitment; it is his manifest lack of charity. What Mr. Wills said on “The Colbert Report” was insensitive; frankly, it was insulting, not just to me and not just to priests but to millions of sincere, faithful Catholics. The fact that Mr. Wills is a Catholic is not relevant here; his baptismal certificate is not a license for incivility. We would not tolerate this kind of behavior in a non-Catholic. Why do we tolerate it in Mr. Wills?

Every day, in almost every conceivable language, millions of Catholics take part in eucharistic liturgies, in prayers before the Blessed Sacrament, in processions and eucharistic devotions, all manifestations of a deeply held, millennia-old belief that in the Eucharist mere bread and wine do indeed become the body and blood of Christ. This is our faith; this is the faith for which we live and for which many of our forebears died.

Mr. Wills may disagree with how the eucharistic mystery has been traditionally expressed in philosophical or theological terminology; he may even dissent from the substance of that teaching or from any Catholic teaching, for that matter; that is his prerogative. He is not entitled, however, to wantonly insult us with claims that our sacraments are “invented,” that our priests are merely “pretending” or that our most cherished gift is somehow “a fake.” Mr. Wills does not necessarily owe us an account of his unorthodox views. He does, however, owe us an apology.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Vincent Gaitley
5 years 7 months ago
Wm. F. Buckley must be rolling (right wise) in his grave, but Mr. Wills has been disappointing everyone for years so don't expect an apology soon. Nevertheless, Wills' transformation from Buckley's protege to Gore Vidal's echo is the saddest decline of a public intellectual ever.
Bruce Snowden
5 years 7 months ago
Garry Wills is a disappointment! I hope his mind isn’t failing dulling his intellect minimizing Belief and substituting the mysteries of Faith for darkness caused by the giddying vertigo of moral confusion. He now ravages the Faith into which he was Baptized, insulting Believers , especially the beliefs of the Catholic Church, focusing on priesthood and Eucharist, the Sacraments He has insulted millions, including me! Why has he blatantly negated the Jesuit charism that used to be his brightest star religiously and educationally? What a shame! I prayerfully hope that from the Land of the Living his friend Bill Buckley smacks him on the back of his head saying, “Garry, what the hell is wrong with you? I had hoped to spend heaven continuing our conversations! May that “heavenly smack” wake up Garry to the Faith he once had, because as things now stand, he’s no longer Catholic. Let’s pray for Garry.
David Pasinski
5 years 7 months ago
I have appreciated much of Wills writing in both secular and sacred subjects. I have not read "Why Priests?" and am disposed to listen carfefully to his arguments (though they sound like reformation redux), but I agree that what I saw on Colbert was extrememely disappointing intellectually. I expect more.
J. Richard DURNAN
5 years 7 months ago
The criticisms of Gary Wills behavior noted in Father Malone’s article and subsequent comments are well-deserved. It’s hard to understand why Wills is so flip in his remarks about his church community. Nonetheless, what is truly sad is that his claims can’t be openly discussed in Catholic Church circles. I’m a 78 year-old, life-long practicing Catholic. I find that the more I learn about how we got from Jesus Christ to the 21st-century Catholic Church, the more I realize we’ve often been mislead. It seems that dogma and doctrine have accumulated like centuries of barnacles, so that the beautiful shape of Christ’s barque is obliterated. This continues on the part of the institutional Church, particularly the centralized and seemingly ossified bureaucracy in Rome. Why is there such a fear of addressing knotty questions? As a youngster, I was led to believe, and proud to claim, that our Catholic Church possessed the truth, unchanged since Jesus walked the Earth, in contrast to all the other benighted religions. Now, I know that there’s little evidence for this, yet it seems that Rome and most of the hierarchy act like it’s true. So, when someone like Gary Wills comes along, why not listen to what he says, take it seriously, and let his claims be discussed, as we simultaneously and lovingly correct his behavior?
Anne Chapman
5 years 7 months ago
I'm curious about this article, since it ran a week or so ago and generated more comments than are shown here, some of which were critical of Fr. Malone's opinions on this. Fr. Malone, are you censoring commentary from readers about your personal opinions?
Barbara POHL
5 years 7 months ago
The demand for an apology from Gary Wills for his comment on "The Colbert Report", that transubstantiation is just pretended or faked by the church, was absolutely spot on, despite the possibility of getting one being highly unlikely.


The latest from america

Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018
Kevin Clarke tells us about his reporting from Iraq.
Olga SeguraOctober 19, 2018