Bloody Hands

Re “Electoral Responsibility” (Editorial, 10/29): Thanks for continuing to muddy the waters. It has become a tradition for me to cast my ballot for president every four years by going into the voting booth and holding my nose. It is a tortured exercise. I agree that defense spending is a national disgrace. I also agree that health care should be a basic right and that Roe v. Wade should be overturned so that voters once again get a say in how abortion is legislated. I don’t remember the last time I cast my vote for president and walked out of the booth without feeling that I had blood on my hands.

Steve MitcheLl


Lancaster, Pa.

Prayers Answered

Re “Waiting for Gabriel,” by Timothy P. O’Malley (10/22): If possible, emotionally or financially, consider adoption. Six years ago we were where the author and his wife are now, and it felt like hell. I prayed a lot, but felt as if I were praying into a hollow well, and each month got worse. We dreaded family gatherings and the people at work had long stopped asking me, “Any plans for children?”

One day my wife, who was really sick of fertility drugs, etc., suggested adoption, and it was like the first break of sunlight after weeks of rain. A kind cousin, out of the blue, offered financial assistance (I guess I wasn’t really praying down a well), and a year later we had a wonderful little boy, Luis, from Guatemala. Three months after Luis came home, my wife started throwing up her breakfast, and we realized Luis was going to have a sibling (again, I guess I wasn’t praying down a well). A year to the day after Luis came home, little brother Danny was born.

Now those dark days seem a lifetime away. (Our boys are three and six.) But this fine article brought it all back. Keep praying, but consider, if possible, that there are lots of little ones out there praying for a nice home and kind, loving parents. Best of luck.

Mike Casey

North Yarmouth, Me.

Family Advice

“On Their Way,” by Elizabeth A. Donnelly and Phillip E. Pulaski (10/22), is a lovely and inspiring article. I commend the authors for facilitating the development of their daughters’ lived faith. I worry, however, that young parents may read this article and feel immensely intimidated. It’s not always possible to send one’s kids to Catholic schools, fund overseas mission trips and come up with a host of inspiring Catholic relatives.

My husband and I have three sons, 16, 18 and 22. One of their grandfathers was an atheist, and they attend public schools. But they share a vibrant and active Catholic faith. My advice: Talk as a family about what is really important in life; find regular opportunities to pray together; develop small rituals around the liturgical year; discuss Scripture together and learn about the saints; find opportunities to serve others with your children; teach your children the fundamentals of the Catholic religion and also learn together about other faith traditions; most important, find a church with a congregation, clergy and faith formation program that will nourish everyone in the family.

I cannot over-emphasize the importance of this last point. Worshipping together in a vibrant faith community that revitalizes our minds, hearts and spirits has helped my boys to become not only faithful Catholics, but also retreat leaders, cantors, lectors and parish council members.

Amanda Green

Belmont, Mass.

Two-Tiered Education System

Re “School Daze” (Editorial 10/15): On the whole, America did a much better job than the rest of the national press in offering a balanced, thoughtful assessment of the Chicago teachers’ strike that acknowledged the deeper issues and avoided union-bashing. But it also missed the opportunity to take a more critical look at Catholic education’s current and future role in our two-tiered education system. Why, for example, is America so quick to endorse merit pay and other “accountability” standards, measures based on standardized testing, when those same ideas are rarely implemented in Catholic education?

More fundamentally, I know of no Catholic school that does what traditional public schools are asked to do every day: educate every child who walks in the door, regardless of their socioeconomic status, language, special needs or level of parental involvement. Even the most laudable inner-city Catholic educational models, like Cristo Rey schools, depend to some degree on the ability to screen their students. The Catholic Church should ask harder, big-picture questions about its educational enterprise: Vouchers or no vouchers, are Catholic schools resolving or only deepening the division of U.S. schoolchildren into haves and have-nots?

Charles Bergman

Chicago, Ill.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Jim McCrea
5 years 11 months ago
Steve Mitchell: how often do you think voters should have the chance to vote on the legality of abortion? How about voting rights for Blacks? Women? How about the right of mixed races to marry?


The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018