HHS Continues Suit Against Little Sisters

The federal government is pursuing its case against the Little Sisters of the Poor in an attempt to get the religious order to comply with newly issued interim rules regarding the Department of Health and Human Services' contraception mandate under the Affordable Care Act.

The government filed a brief Sept. 8 in the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, where the Little Sisters of the Poor run a home for the aged. Other plaintiffs in the case include Southern Nazarene University in Denver and Reaching Souls International, an Oklahoma nonprofit. Attorneys for the Little Sisters of the Poor said they would continue to fight the contraceptive mandate.

Advertisement

"Religious ministries in these cases serve tens of thousands of Americans, helping the poor and homeless and healing the sick," said a Sept. 9 statement by Adele Keim, counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which represents the religious order.

"The Little Sisters of the Poor alone serve more than 10,000 of the elderly poor. These charities want to continue following their faith. They want to focus on ministry -- such as sharing their faith and serving the poor -- without worrying about the threat of massive IRS penalties," Keim added.

"The government has already exempted millions of Americans from this requirement for commercial or secular reasons, so it should certainly protect the Little Sisters for religious reasons."

The government contended in its brief that the Supreme Court's reasoning in June in the Hobby Lobby case, which held that closely held for-profit companies can also opt out of providing contraceptive coverage to their employees, underscored the government's position.

"The existing accommodation, the Supreme Court explained, 'seeks to respect the religious liberty of religious nonprofit corporations while ensuring that the employees of these entities have precisely the same access to all FDA-approved contraceptives as employees of companies whose owners have no religious objections to providing such coverage,'" the government said in its brief.

The plaintiffs' notion that "opting out of providing contraceptive coverage 'triggers' or 'facilitates' provision of such coverage by third parties" is a "mistaken view," the government brief said.

"Although the Supreme Court previously required the Little Sisters to do nothing more than notify the government of their religious objection, the government issued new regulations last month in an attempt to circumvent the Supreme Court's order," said a statement by the Becket Fund.

Keim said the Becket Fund would soon file a brief to counter the government's claims.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Tim O'Leary
3 years 5 months ago
So, the Obama Administration doesn't have a strategy for ISIS but it sure has for its Battle with the Nuns, which includes not listening to the Supreme Court. I note that the LCWR does not represent this order. They are part of the CMSWR.
michael baland
3 years 5 months ago
The title of this article appears to be intentionally misleading. The Sisters are the plaintiffs, not the Department of Health and Human Services.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

February has been one of the most violent months in the seven years of conflict.
Gerard O’ConnellFebruary 25, 2018
Asia Bibi's husband and her daughter Eisham arrive in the Vatican prior to a private meeting with Pope Francis. (Credit: Vatican News)
The pope said Rebecca Bitrus and Asia Bibi are models for a society that today has ever more fear of suffering.
Gerard O’ConnellFebruary 24, 2018
(Nick Ansell/PA via AP, archive)
Recent allegations about one of the United Kingdom’s biggest and best-known charities has driven increased demands from some quarters that overseas aid be reduced, if not abolished completely.
David StewartFebruary 23, 2018
Students who walked out of classes from Montgomery County Public Schools in Maryland protest against gun violence in front of the White House on Feb. 21 in Washington. (CNS photo/Kevin Lamarque, Reuters)
The desire for stronger gun control may not translate into more caution with gun storage among owners of firearms.
Kevin ClarkeFebruary 23, 2018