From Deterrence to Abolition; Vatican Revises Stance on Weapons

FALSE SECURITY. Ballistic missiles at a Russian parade.

The Catholic Church seemed to throw its support behind what is, in Europe at least, an accelerating movement toward the abolition of nuclear weapons during the first day, Dec. 8, of the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons.

In a message to the conference participants from Pope Francis, read by Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, apostolic nuncio and permanent observer of the Holy See to the United Nations in Geneva, the pope said: “Nuclear deterrence and the threat of mutually assured destruction cannot be the basis for an ethics of fraternity and peaceful coexistence among peoples and states. The youth of today and tomorrow deserve far more…. Peace must be built on justice, socio-economic development, freedom, respect for fundamental human rights, the participation of all in public affairs and the building of trust between peoples.”

Advertisement

Pope Francis added, “I am convinced that the desire for peace and fraternity planted deep in the human heart will bear fruit in concrete ways to ensure that nuclear weapons are banned once and for all.”

Expanding on the pope’s statement later at a press conference, Archbishop Tomasi said: “The consistent position of the Vatican has been against atomic weapons. From the very beginning, from John XXIII in ‘Pacem in Terris’ onward, there has been a consistent line opposing the use, the possession, the development of nuclear weapons. During the ’80s, especially during the cold war, the use of deterrence was accepted as a condition for avoiding worst results, but not as a value in itself.”

But after the end of the cold war and in a multipolar world, Archbishop Tomasi later suggested, deterrence was no longer justifiable, explaining that the risk of accident or the threat of terrorists acquiring fissile material has become too great. During the press conference, he said, “So we go back to the principal that the possession and use of atomic weapons is not at all acceptable.”

A Vatican official explained that deterrence had been accepted only because of the crisis situation of the near past and only as a step toward complete nuclear disarmament, but as decades passed since John Paul II had reluctantly acknowledged deterrence, that condition has not been met, at least not fully, by global nuclear superpowers. As other officials at the Vienna conference have pointed out, U.S. and Russian negotiations have led to substantially reduced stockpiles of nuclear warheads in recent years.

A document released at the conference by several of the participating organizations, entitled “Nuclear Disarmament: Time for Abolition” called nuclear weapons a global problem, arguing, “Now more than ever the facts of technological and political interdependence cry out for an ethic of solidarity in which we work with one another for a less dangerous, morally responsible global future.”

The Holy See statement calls for scrutiny of the belief that nuclear deterrence “is a stable basis for peace.” A Vatican official went so far as to describe political fealty to the strategic policy of deterrence as “a kind of religion and faith” in its own right.

According to the statement, “Rather than providing security…reliance on a strategy of nuclear deterrence has created a less secure world.” Instead, the Holy See argues, the current deterrence regime works “more as an incentive for countries to break out of the nonproliferation regime and develop nuclear arsenals of their own.”

Just as bad, Vatican officials added, is the troubling misallocation of national resources that will persist under current nuclear weapons policies. The United States has recently announced plans to spend billions on the modernization of its nuclear force using resources, Vatican officials say, that would do far more for the common good if they were invested in resolving social inequities.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Ernest Martinson
3 years 5 months ago
The U.S. plan to modernize its nuclear force violates the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty which calls for eventual nuclear disarmament. This diabolical plan also violates the law of God. Trust in Government, though, trumps trust in God. Government is perceived to be our benefactor with its Social and National Security. Government is seen to deliver in the here and now and not in the hereafter.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Las palabras de Jesús fueron mucho más que doctrina humanista, porque fueron revelación.
Among both listeners and staff, one can find those who were born and raised in the United States or moved here at a young age and those who are new to the country; those who have papers and those who do not or whose parents do not.
Jim McDermottMay 24, 2018
Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh and his disciples at Rajneeshpuram (Credit: Netflix)
Sometimes the best way to understand a phenomenon is to look at its parody.
José DueñoMay 24, 2018
Chris Rock (photo: Netflix)
“Tambourine” should be mandatory viewing in all diocesan Pre-Cana programs.
Jake MartinMay 24, 2018