Catholic Leaders Defend Services For the Poor After Bipartisan Deal

BUDGET PRIORITIES: Getting down to business at the Baltimore Catholic Charities Head Start program in Edgewood, Md., in June.

Fallout from the partial government shutdown in October and another looming round of automatic spending cuts in January kept congressional leaders busy at year’s end, finalizing a budget deal Republicans and Democrats could live with. By Dec. 18 they succeeded, passing a bipartisan budget deal in both the House and Senate. Through a tumultuous 2013, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and other Catholic advocates, including Catholic Charities USA, had pressed for a budget that does not adversely affect poor people.

The bishops and other advocates hoped to throw a “circle of protection” around programs like poverty-focused international assistance, affordable housing and community development, education, Head Start, workforce development and emergency unemployment compensation. The budget deal, announced by Senator Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington, and Representative Paul D. Ryan, Republican of Wisconsin, chairs of the Senate and House budget committees respectively, caps spending at slightly more than $1 trillion in each of the next two years. Though it succeeds in turning back a looming automatic cut to social spending, the agreement will actually mean reductions in social service discretionary spending when inflation and population growth are factored in, as soon as 2015.

Advertisement

The deal signaled at least a temporary truce on the budget between Democrats and Republicans. Under the agreement, $63 billion in a second round of the sequester, across-the-board spending cuts in military and non-military programs, set for mid-January would be avoided.

Representatives affiliated with the Tea Party movement had opposed any deal that increased government spending, leaving House Speaker John A. Boehner, Republican of Ohio, to rally moderate Republicans to join Democrats in supporting a budget bill. The final budget bill measure does not extend unemployment benefits for the long-term unemployed, which expired on Dec. 28.

Commenting on the deal in a statement, Network, a Catholic social justice lobby, said: “Although we are relieved that domestic needs programs are not being cut at levels previously proposed by Republican legislators, we continue to believe that military spending [$520.5 billion in 2014] should be cut further, which would allow more funding for [underfunded] human needs programs…. We are also deeply unhappy that the agreement did not include extension of long-term unemployment benefits for 1.3 million people.” Network called on Congress to pass an extension of those emergency federal unemployment benefits “for American workers still suffering the effects of the economic recession.... Our workers need it and so does our economy.”

In a statement on Dec. 13, Archbishop Thomas G. Wenski of Miami, the new chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, commended Ryan and Murray for embracing civil dialogue and setting aside partisanship in crafting a modest replacement to sequestration. “Millions of working families across the country and around the world struggle to survive and achieve stability. While this agreement is an important first step to accomplishing that, more needs to be done,” the archbishop said. “Congress and the administration still face serious and consequential decisions regarding appropriations for fiscal year 2014.”

Archbishop Wenski urged “wise bipartisan leadership in targeting this limited sequestration relief by drawing a circle of protection around programs that protect poor and vulnerable people at home and abroad, advance the common good, and promote human life and dignity.”

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
J Cabaniss
4 years 10 months ago
There are many issues where the involvement of the clergy is a welcome and necessary thing, but by supporting or opposing particular budget questions they overstep what is appropriate and lend their influence to purely political concerns. It is one thing to say the budget should reflect our concern for the poor but quite a different thing to say we should spend more on program X and less on program Y. The worst thing about their (over) involvement in political issues is that it leads to a debasement of the discussion by feeding the perception that the side that opposes the bishops' views does so not because of doubt about the effectiveness of the programs they support, but because they don't care about the poor. There are in fact very few specific proposals about which the bishops should express opinions and the budget is not an area where their involvement is helpful.
Catherine Stanford
4 years 10 months ago
The resistance to crafting more effective anti-poverty programs does not come from NETWORK and other faith groups who are fighting these cuts in the social safety net--it comes from the very people who say we should cut these programs. I am very glad that we have strong faith voices that defend the poor. The notion that anyone who is poor is somehow "undeserving" is part of the current problem. Let's continue to work hard to stop the war against the poor!
Mike Evans
4 years 9 months ago
It is clear that we must value war and destruction far more than life and hope for the future. Our federal budget spends $680 billion for war and only $85 billion on social programs. On its face, that proportion is out of whack. Our congressman complains that we have spent enough "coddling the unemployed and poor." But we still have one in 4 families suffering from hunger, 11% unemployment, and a severe shortage of affordable housing. How will we answer the Lord when he recites Matthew 25? Sorry, Jesus, we just couldn't afford it. We had to make the payments on our new BMW and buy some fancy new warships and missiles.

Advertisement

The latest from america

The Adorers of the Blood of Christ have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether their religious freedom rights were violated by the construction and pending use of a natural gas pipeline through its land.
Throughout the discussions leading up to the synod's final week, small groups "have been very specific and intentional that we don't become too Western with our approach."
In a statement issued a few minutes after the broadcast of a story from Radio-Canada investigating sexual abuse allegedly committed by 10 Oblate missionaries in First Nation communities, the Quebec Assembly of Catholic Bishops told of their "indignation and shame" for the "terrible tragedy of
Central American migrants depart from Ciudad Hidalgo, Mexico, on Oct. 21. (AP Photo/Moises Castillo)
Many of the migrants in the caravan are fleeing Central America’s “Northern Triangle”—El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras. These countries are beset by “the world’s highest murder rates, deaths linked to drug trafficking and organized crime and endemic poverty.”
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 23, 2018