Catholic Leaders Defend Services For the Poor After Bipartisan Deal

Fallout from the partial government shutdown in October and another looming round of automatic spending cuts in January kept congressional leaders busy at year’s end, finalizing a budget deal Republicans and Democrats could live with. By Dec. 18 they succeeded, passing a bipartisan budget deal in both the House and Senate. Through a tumultuous 2013, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and other Catholic advocates, including Catholic Charities USA, had pressed for a budget that does not adversely affect poor people.

The bishops and other advocates hoped to throw a “circle of protection” around programs like poverty-focused international assistance, affordable housing and community development, education, Head Start, workforce development and emergency unemployment compensation. The budget deal, announced by Senator Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington, and Representative Paul D. Ryan, Republican of Wisconsin, chairs of the Senate and House budget committees respectively, caps spending at slightly more than $1 trillion in each of the next two years. Though it succeeds in turning back a looming automatic cut to social spending, the agreement will actually mean reductions in social service discretionary spending when inflation and population growth are factored in, as soon as 2015.


The deal signaled at least a temporary truce on the budget between Democrats and Republicans. Under the agreement, $63 billion in a second round of the sequester, across-the-board spending cuts in military and non-military programs, set for mid-January would be avoided.

Representatives affiliated with the Tea Party movement had opposed any deal that increased government spending, leaving House Speaker John A. Boehner, Republican of Ohio, to rally moderate Republicans to join Democrats in supporting a budget bill. The final budget bill measure does not extend unemployment benefits for the long-term unemployed, which expired on Dec. 28.

Commenting on the deal in a statement, Network, a Catholic social justice lobby, said: “Although we are relieved that domestic needs programs are not being cut at levels previously proposed by Republican legislators, we continue to believe that military spending [$520.5 billion in 2014] should be cut further, which would allow more funding for [underfunded] human needs programs…. We are also deeply unhappy that the agreement did not include extension of long-term unemployment benefits for 1.3 million people.” Network called on Congress to pass an extension of those emergency federal unemployment benefits “for American workers still suffering the effects of the economic recession.... Our workers need it and so does our economy.”

In a statement on Dec. 13, Archbishop Thomas G. Wenski of Miami, the new chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, commended Ryan and Murray for embracing civil dialogue and setting aside partisanship in crafting a modest replacement to sequestration. “Millions of working families across the country and around the world struggle to survive and achieve stability. While this agreement is an important first step to accomplishing that, more needs to be done,” the archbishop said. “Congress and the administration still face serious and consequential decisions regarding appropriations for fiscal year 2014.”

Archbishop Wenski urged “wise bipartisan leadership in targeting this limited sequestration relief by drawing a circle of protection around programs that protect poor and vulnerable people at home and abroad, advance the common good, and promote human life and dignity.”

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
J Cabaniss
4 years 3 months ago
There are many issues where the involvement of the clergy is a welcome and necessary thing, but by supporting or opposing particular budget questions they overstep what is appropriate and lend their influence to purely political concerns. It is one thing to say the budget should reflect our concern for the poor but quite a different thing to say we should spend more on program X and less on program Y. The worst thing about their (over) involvement in political issues is that it leads to a debasement of the discussion by feeding the perception that the side that opposes the bishops' views does so not because of doubt about the effectiveness of the programs they support, but because they don't care about the poor. There are in fact very few specific proposals about which the bishops should express opinions and the budget is not an area where their involvement is helpful.
Catherine Stanford
4 years 3 months ago
The resistance to crafting more effective anti-poverty programs does not come from NETWORK and other faith groups who are fighting these cuts in the social safety net--it comes from the very people who say we should cut these programs. I am very glad that we have strong faith voices that defend the poor. The notion that anyone who is poor is somehow "undeserving" is part of the current problem. Let's continue to work hard to stop the war against the poor!
Mike Evans
4 years 3 months ago
It is clear that we must value war and destruction far more than life and hope for the future. Our federal budget spends $680 billion for war and only $85 billion on social programs. On its face, that proportion is out of whack. Our congressman complains that we have spent enough "coddling the unemployed and poor." But we still have one in 4 families suffering from hunger, 11% unemployment, and a severe shortage of affordable housing. How will we answer the Lord when he recites Matthew 25? Sorry, Jesus, we just couldn't afford it. We had to make the payments on our new BMW and buy some fancy new warships and missiles.


Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

The appointments are part of an ongoing effort to give a greater role to women in the work of the Roman Curia offices, the central administration of the Catholic church.
Gerard O’ConnellApril 21, 2018
Ivette Escobar, a student at Central American University in San Salvador, helps finish a rug in honor of the victims in the 1989 murder of six Jesuits, their housekeeper and her daughter on the UCA campus, part of the 25th anniversary commemoration of the Jesuit martyrs in 2014. (CNS photo/Edgardo Ayala) 
A human rights attorney in the United States believes that the upcoming canonization of Blessed Oscar Romero in October has been a factor in a decision to revisit the 1989 Jesuit massacre at the University of Central America.
Kevin ClarkeApril 20, 2018
Journalists photograph the lethal injection facility at San Quentin State Prison in California in 2010. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg, File)
In California, Catholic opponents of the death penalty are trying to protect the largest population of inmates awaiting execution in the Western Hemisphere.
Jim McDermottApril 20, 2018
Photo: the Hank Center at Loyola University Chicago
Bishop McElroy said that Catholics must embrace “the virtues of solidarity, compassion, integrity, hope and peace-building.”