Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
The EditorsMay 03, 2016
In this March 11, 2016 file photo, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks at the Canada 2020 and the Center for American Progress luncheon gathering in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

A proposed new bill to legalize physician-assisted suicide in Canada has drawn strong opposition from an impressive coalition of religious voices. Standing together at a press conference on April 19, Catholic, Jewish, evangelical and Muslim leaders registered their grave concern about the measure proposed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and made an admirable pledge: “Our churches, synagogues and mosques are committed to comfort and care for those who are dying and their families.”

Unfortunately, the prime minister’s Liberal Party controls the House of Commons and is expected to pass the measure sometime after the current ban on the practice expires in June. The proposal would make it legal for doctors to prescribe life-ending drugs and would allow nurses and family members to administer the dosage.

A few members of the Liberal Party have said they would not back the bill for religious reasons. On this question, at least, Prime Minister Trudeau does not appear to require strict adherence on the part of his M.P.’s; in 2015 he mandated that any Liberal who sought the party’s support had to agree to vote in favor of pro-choice legislation. Like many who favor legalizing physician-assisted suicide, Prime Minister Trudeau argues from personal experience: in his case, the slow decline of his father, former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, who suffered from Parkinson’s disease. Yet as pro-life advocates have argued time and again, there are always palliative options for patients who suffer grave illness. Canada’s religious leaders are calling for increased access to palliative care and appropriate conscience protections for health care workers. If the bill passes, these protections must be included. Catholic Charities and other religious groups should be allowed to continue their life-affirming ministry to the dying without any government interference.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Lisa Weber
9 years 2 months ago
Those who advocate for physician-assisted suicide do not seem to understand that withdrawing care, not food and water but treatments and/or medicines, will allow a person's death to occur without the ethical quandary of assisted suicide or euthanasia.

The latest from america

Pope Leo XIV has appointed the French archbishop of Chambéry, Thibault Verny, as the new president of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors. He succeeds Cardinal Seán O’Malley, 81, the emeritus archbishop of Boston.
Gerard O’ConnellJuly 05, 2025
U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., speaks with other members of the House July 3, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington after final passage of U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping spending and tax bill. (OSV News photo/Jonathan Ernst, Reuters)
“Deep cuts” to SNAP and Medicaid will “inflict real suffering on these families…. SNAP and Medicaid are not luxuries, they are lifelines for millions of children across our country.”
Kevin ClarkeJuly 03, 2025
It was one of the first times Leo has spoken unscripted at length in public, responding to questions posed to him by the children.
The Vatican has named the judges that will preside over the trial of disgraced Father Marko Rupnik.