Of Many Things

In a recent issue of The Art Newspaper, I read that Belgravia Gallery in London is about to start selling once again its signed, limited-edition lithographs by Nelson Mandela to mark the artist’s 90th birthday on July 18. Readers may recall that in 2001 Mandela became a fledgling artist at the age of 83, when he produced a set of handprints (his own) followed by two sets of charcoal and pastel drawings. Over three months, with the help of a tutor and professional artists to print and process the work, Mandela made his images into lithographs and signed each one. The purpose was to raise money for charity—all proceeds to go to the Nelson Mandela Trust.

A festive exhibition opening and auction took place on Robben Island, off Cape Town, at the prison where Mr. Mandela spent 18 of his 27 years in captivity. The prison is the subject of his art. At the auction, two British businessmen made purchases totaling $200,000 each. Later Oprah Winfrey, Bill Clinton, Prince Charles and David Beckham, among others, also bought prints. But the sweet plan to help the needy soon soured. In 2005 Mandela filed a suit against Ismail Ayob, his longtime friend and former personal lawyer, the man who had suggested the art project initially and was entrusted with managing it. The lawsuit alleges that Ayob forged Mandela’s name on countless lithographs that sold for up to £15,000 apiece, and that at least £2.6 million (over $5 million) from such sales should be returned to the Nelson Mandela Trust. The suit has not yet been resolved.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the statesman’s minimalist pictures—of his cell, the guard tower, the hospital ward, the courtyard and more—with accompanying “motivations” (handwritten comments about each image) have been shown and sold throughout the world. They can all be viewed online (http://www.kizo.co.za/product_listing.php?id=71) and deserve to be seen and pondered. Yet while Nelson Mandela has tried to halt the exploitation of his name and the sale of his art until the fakes can be sorted out, getting control of intellectual property is a hard battle to win.

The Belgravia Gallery, which stopped selling its lithographs by Mandela three years ago, secured the services of a forgery expert to defend the authenticity of its holdings. Not surprisingly, the expert has assured the gallery that its holdings are genuine. Now the gallery will resume its marketing.

What I find unsettling about the scandal is the distorted image it paints of Nelson Mandela. A victorious freedom fighter; a moral giant who overturned apartheid, brought democracy to South Africa and was elected at age 75 to lead that nation; a Noble Peace Prize winner and devoted philanthropist—this noble man appears tied down by midgets, a Gulliver at the hands of the Lilliputians. Or perhaps a King Lear, reduced in old age by the treachery of those closest to him. What else can he do? A forger could, it seems, exploit Mandela’s hard-won reputation and leech off his handiwork for years to come.

Focus, though, on the real portrait of the artist—that still holds me rapt. Anna Hunter of the Belgravia Gallery said Mandela told her “he would much prefer to be an artist, rather than a book writer.” That gave me pause. The statement gained credibility when I pieced it together with a New York Times account of Mandela’s own speech at the exhibition opening on Robben Island: Mandela “talked about his lifelong romance with color…about growing up as a shepherd boy in the green fields of the rural Eastern Cape province. He reminisced about the gleaming stars, the silvery moon and the shimmering rainbows.” After 27 years of life behind bars—which cast a gray scrim over everything—color burst into Mandela’s field of vision and lit up his world once more. Art can be play. It can transport one, bring back youth, inflame the human spirit. Mandela found the artist within himself.

“Robben Island was once a place of darkness,” writes Mandela in one of his motivations, “but out of that darkness has come…a light so powerful that it could not be hidden behind prison walls…. I have attempted to colour the island sketches in ways that reflect the positive light in which I view it.” The artist wants to convey “that even the most fantastic dreams can be achieved if we are prepared to endure life’s challenges.” Here’s a mark made by Mandela that no one can forge: Robben Island prison is closed. In Dec. 1999, it became South Africa’s first World Heritage Site. Happy Birthday, Mr. President.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
JOHN HEFFERNAN OF M
10 years 2 months ago
Thank you for your article. I'm using the image homiletically, to demonstrate the significance of authentic - as in the PEARL of great price. Mandela - man who fought for justice, tolerates no injustice, no compromises, won't allow his work to be compromised. Each phony seems to diminish the authentic work of his own hands. Then: authenticity is not earned (nor the Kingdom) it is only given by God, and lived by faithful people, i.e., N Mandela and us all...

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018