Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Drew ChristiansenNovember 19, 2007
I was never a member of the so-called process school of philosophy, but nonetheless Alfred North Whitehead, the mathematician and logician who inspired that approach, is one of my favorite thinkers. The scholasticism of process philosophy put me off, and, to be honest, I find metaphysics—“cosmology” to the Whiteheadeans—too speculative for my practical turn of mind. I drew insight from books in which Whitehead anticipated or distilled his vision, like Science and the Modern World, Modes of Thoughtand Essays in Science and Philosophy. Even more I have found myself over the years drawing on works that describe fundamental human experiences, especially Religion in the Making and Adventures of Ideas. The latter was his philosophy of history and civilization.

A phenomenon that preoccupied Whitehead was the life and death of civilizations. He believed that a particular type of civilization had only a limited life-span. It could repeat itself only for a restricted period of time before facing decline. Only a rapid transition to a new “ideal” can save a civilization from decay. My gut feeling is that for the United States the 2008 elections will be that kind of moment. We stand at a historic turning point, where “stale repetition” of worn-out ideas (and practices) will hasten America’s decline, or reinvigoration with new ideas and a new sensibility will allow its rebirth.

I worry because the leading candidates of both parties seem to offer us government-as-usual at a time when continuity could not be more problematic. Sen. Hillary Clinton refuses to put any meaningful distance between herself and the hostile foreign policies of the Bush administration; and Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, threatens to be even more bellicose than the incumbent, if such a thing is possible. Even the Democratic Congress, elected in the hope of effective opposition, seems captive to the same mentality, unable even to put itself on record against the disastrous policies of the White House. Their calculation seems to be, as James Traub suggested in the New York Times Magazine for Nov. 4, that Americans are neither ready nor able to relinquish their fear.

The public’s thralldom to fear is certainly a consideration for any politician. The times, however, call for extraordinary leadership. The miscalculations and the obstinacy of the administration have bequeathed a Pandora’s box of troubles, not just to the next president but to the next generation: restoring the constitutional balance between civil rights and security, respecting the rights of foreign nationals, reinstituting checks and balances in government, reviving the nation’s standing in world affairs and righting the imbalances in the national economy. In addition, health care needs a real fix, and Social Security needs a plan for sustaining its long-term viability.

Correcting the failed policies of the past seven years would be a daunting agenda for any politician, but the next president will also face an array of global challenges that will not wait. Not to address them is to court disaster or, at best, rapid decline. Above all, a new international regime to curb global warming and reduce its worst effects needs to be worked out. Just as important is re-establishing a system for nuclear nonproliferation. Tensions with Russia, expansion of the terrorist threat and instability in Pakistan, not to mention the Iranian nuclear program, all heighten the risk of nuclear catastrophe. As globalization advances, devising systems for managing the world economy will be a challenge; and outfitting the American economy for the global marketplace will likewise be a formidable test.

None of these challenges are susceptible to the solutions of conventional wisdom. They all require imaginative thinking and inspiring, resolute leadership. This is an epochal election, in which what passes for “experience” in American politics will count for very little. Yes, powers of persuasion, coalition-building skills and old-time charisma will be enormous assets in addressing so large an agenda; but catering to the party base, “triangulation,” the Christmas-stocking approach to legislative initiatives with a small gift for everyone and tough talk to assuage the ill-defined fears of the masses, while they may win elections, will set the nation on a downward slope of decline and the world spinning into greater instability. America’s renewal and the future of a globalized world depend on the advent of a new generation of American leadership that understands the future belongs to those who will guide the public on a historic “adventure of ideas.”

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
14 years 6 months ago
You are 'right on' with your article. It is the failed policies of many years, not just the last 7, although they certainly stand out. For many years, we in the U.S. have treated the rest of the world like the earth revolves around us. Money politics drives partisanship, which gives rise to ideologues. Without the extraodinary leadership that you mentioned, the U.S. could be on a steady decline toward world war, extinction or both. If only we had a candidate with a worldview, and experience in bringing people together for coalition-building and reconciliation. Is it too late to draft Drew Christiansen for President?
14 years 6 months ago
There was a poem that went "We'll all be rooned, says Hanrahan, afore the year is oot..." and it never happened. Just as this nation will muddle through some more catastrophes without Chicken Little's being right, just as the Church has done. But if this nation of morons elects another Republican, then indeed, it's lights out. Even this nation of wealth and power couldn't survive that.
Thomas Farrelly
14 years 6 months ago
The November 19 "Of Many Things" is signed by Drew Christiansen, S.J., but it seems to have been written by two different authors, one writing column one, and the other column two. One author complains that "...Americans are neither ready nor able to relinquish their fear" and again disapprovingly mentions "the public's thralldom to fear". A sensitive reader might try to free himself from such thralldom, but going on to column two he finds the second author pointing out this: "Not to address them ..(an array of global challenges)...is to court disaster." and "Tensions with Russia, expansion of the terrorist threat and instability in Pakistan, not to mention the Iranian nuclear program, all heighten the risk of nuclear catastrophe." Presumably even the author of column one might think the threat of nuclear catastrophe was ample cause for fear, even though the column two author forgot to mention North Korean nuclear weapons and the threat of terrorism here in the US. (Perhaps because he would like to gut the Patriot Act?)

The latest from america

For people who live in New York City, Times Square is a nightmare place, a hellish whirlpool of bodies, noise and capitalism. But this weekend I discovered something new and not awful there.
Jim McDermottMay 17, 2022
For more than three decades, Mike Davis has offered clear and often stinging counterpoints to the prevailing vision of the “California Dream.”
James T. KeaneMay 17, 2022
We include fragments of poems that, while not contest finalists, provide one more way for America to shine a light on the ongoing horror in Ukraine.
Joe Hoover, S.J.May 17, 2022
I begged them: “Keep the money. Just give me the photos of my family.”
Lisa MullenneauxMay 17, 2022