The Los Angeles Times recently described the growing field of neurotheology, the intersection (as one would suppose) of the neurological underpinnings of religious experience. Geoffrey Mohan writes:

Other animals have hierarchies, organized behaviors, even a semblance of norms. Only humans have religion and science. And the two have seldom been on civil terms.
Jeff Anderson and Julie Korenberg, neuroscientists at the University of Utah, want to change that. They're among a growing number of scientists aiming their field's most sophisticated machinery at religious cognition.
"It amazes me how one of the most profound influences on human behavior is virtually completely unstudied," Anderson said. "We think about how much this drives people's behavior, and yet we don't know the first thing about where in the brain that's even registered."
The researchers want to see more than religion's registry on the brain. They want to know whether it differs across sects, or by intensity of belief. They want to see what genes it activates, what hormones it releases, and how it relates to social behaviors. 

For more on this fascinating area of research, see this NPR story, "Neurotheology: This is Your Brain on Religion," which profiles Dr. Andrew Newberg, one of the pioneers in the field. 




Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
J Cosgrove
3 years 9 months ago
They should look at liberals vs conservatives. Some times I believe that beliefs of this nature must be hard wired. There seems to so little give amongst many of them. Also, why are atheist so irrational but claim to be rational?
Winni Veils
3 years 9 months ago
They have have done a good number of these studies on liberals vs. conservatives and have found fairly hard-wired differences, especially in the fear/disgust response areas of the brain that I found pretty interesting. As to atheists, I think we all are pretty irrational but think we are rational, so I wouldn't expect atheists to be any different.


The latest from america

The tête-à-tête between Paul Krugman and Nancy Pelosi in Manhattan was like a documentary about a once-popular rock band. (Rod Morata/Michael Priest Photography)
Speaking in a deep blue stronghold, the Democratic leader of the House calls for “civility” and cautiously hopes that she will again wield the speaker’s gavel in January.
Brandon SanchezOctober 16, 2018
The lecture provoked no hostile reaction from the students who heard it. But a media firestorm erupted.
John J. ConleyOctober 16, 2018
Though the current synod appears to lack the sort of drama and high-stakes debates of the previous two, the role of conscience appears to be a common thread.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 16, 2018
When Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised their fists on the Olympic podium, their act drew widespread criticism. Now Colin Kaepernick is the face of Nike.
Michael McKinleyOctober 16, 2018