Louis C.K., Diane Ravitch and the Common Core

Diane Ravitch, Louis C.K., and the Common Core State Standards: thanks to Twitter and social media, somehow this all connects. This is what happened. 

The comedian Louis C.K. recently criticized the Common Core State Standards, based (in part) on his observations of how the new curriculum was affecting his children at their New York schools. This prompted a response by Newsweek writer Alexander Nazaryan, who thought C.K., was wrong, and who defended the Common Core: "introducing a set of national standards is a first step toward widespread accountability, toward the clearly worthy goal of having a teacher in Alaska teach more or less the same thing as a teacher in Alabama. And for those teachers to have to account for what their charges learned. Or didn’t, as it were." Nazaryan then asked for the response of professor and education historian -- and prolific author -- Diane Ravitch. Ravitch responded, awesomely, at her blog. 

Advertisement

In her post titled “My Reply to Alexander Nazaryan of Newsweek,” Ravitch eviscerated the Common Core State Standards and offered a defense of teachers and their passions that should earn a standing ovation: 

Unlike you, Alexander, I see no advantage in "having a teacher in Alaska teach more or less the same thing as a teacher in Alabama." What’s the point of that? If the teacher in Alabama is passionate about the work of Flannery O’Connor, let him or her teach it with passion. If the teacher in Alaska is fascinated with the arctic tundra, teach it. I assume you have not read the study by Tom Loveless of Brookings, who pointed out that the Common Core standards were likely to make little or no difference in achievement. After all, states with high standards have wide variations in achievement, as do states with low standards.

I see no value in the arbitrary division between literature and informational text prescribed in the Common Core. I know where the numbers come from. They were instructions to assessment developers of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (I served on its governing board for seven years). The ratios were not intended as instructions to teachers. This is balderdash. English teachers should teach what they know and love. If they love fiction, teach it. If they love nonfiction, teach it. Why should a committee with no classroom teachers on it in 2009 tell reading teachers how to apportion their reading time? I doubt that teachers of math and science will spend any time on fiction anyway.

I couldn't agree more. Flattening regional variations and imposing sameness will drive away excellent teachers. To be sure, schools must balance curriculum standards and a teacher's interests; the classroom cannot become an open mic night. And I believe that curriculum should provide some kind of shared understanding and vocabulary. For example, everybody should know some Shakespeare. Everybody (in our country, at least) should understand the history of the United States. 

But when it comes to the weighing of professional autonomy against national or state standards, the tie goes to the teacher. Someone might say, "What if the teachers are bad?" Well, yes, that's a risk. This means the hiring process is crucial. Schools must scrutinize candidates carefully. But a school is far more likely to attract talented, motivated teachers if those teachers know they have freedom and flexibility. Enthusiasm derives from personal involvement, from feeling that one has a personal stake in the material. To borrow from writer and teacher Parker Palmer, teachers teach best when they teach from their own identity, from their own soul. Teachers teach best when their subject is an extension of the self. As Palmer writes, "in every class I teach, my ability to connect with my students, and to connect them with the subject, depends less on the methods I use than on the degree to which I know and trust my selfhood--and am willing to make it available and vulnerable in the service of learning." 

This is why, as Ravitch indicates, a teacher from Alaska should be able to teach a different text than a teacher from Alabama. Teachers inspire; exams and standards do not. 

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Bob Baker
3 years 10 months ago
How about this in teaching high school Algebra I in a Catholic school: 1 Show a short video, hopefully related 2 Introduce the problem 3 Work 3 problems 4 Together work 3 problems 5 Students work 3 problems 6 Assign homework (not more than 10 questions & provide all answers) 7 Next day, give quiz: 3 questions, increasing difficulty of concept. Students only pick one (1) to answer. A 40% is given if the student doesn’t try at all; 50% if only one step was Attempted; 60% if beginning steps were Attempted; 70% if all steps were completed but had multiple errors; 85% if only one calculation error; and 95% if everything done correctly. Hard to fail, isn’t it? Welcome to Common Core. (“Because we spent so much money on this program…” was the given response to my inquiry. You should get your money back, was mine.) And for the kicker, there was no plagiarism checking system in place for English, Religion, Science and other subjects and the school deliberately didn’t want to impose it (I’m sure because they feared the results). These students are destined to enter college/community college and end up taking remedial classes, though the graduated from high school. Is this what we really want?
Darel Watson
3 years 8 months ago
Getting in touch with readymade business 4 u is a good way to start your own career.
Ash Edwards
2 years 4 months ago
I do think that in addition to teaching American history, the history of other cultures/countries should also be a key part of American education.Business opportunities
Joel Bissitt
1 year 1 month ago

Getting in touch with Franchise UK is a good way to start your own career as well

Advertisement

The latest from america

Bishop Lawrence T. Persico of Erie, Pa., speaks during a meeting in late January at the headquarters of U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in Washington. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)
“I think we need complete transparency if we’re going to get the trust of the people back,” said Erie Bishop Lawrence T. Persico.
Mélanie Thierry as Marguerite Duras in “Memoir of War.” © Music Box Films
The film tells the story of a woman who worked for the German-controlled Vichy government but secretly joined the Resistance movement.
A. W. Richard Sipe (photo: Facebook)
Sipe's research into celibacy and priestly sexual behavior helped guide the work of church leaders and others responding to the clergy sexual abuse crisis.
Catholic News ServiceAugust 17, 2018
Did Pope Francis depart from Scripture and tradition in declaring the death penalty "inadmissible"? Or was his declaration rooted deeply in both?
Tobias WinrightAugust 17, 2018