The Encyclical and the Supreme Court Opinion

In the wake of the publication of "Laudato Si’" and the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on same-sex marriage, I’ve been ruminating not only on the substantive issues addressed in each document but also on the documents' nature and form, and how those latter qualities are received and perceived within the ad-heavy, character-restricted, emojified milieu of modern communication.

Pope Francis' encyclical spans about 38,000 words, runs near 110 pages in Microsoft Word (12-sized, double-spaced), and contains 172 footnotes. The majority opinion in Obergefell, as published on the U.S. Supreme Court website, is 28 pages single-spaced, and like many groundbreaking Supreme Court decisions, draws upon federal and state case law, statutory law, journal articles, works of history, amicus curiae briefs and more.

Advertisement

I wonder: How many people, regardless of their viewpoints on the contested issues, have read Pope Francis’ encyclical in its entirety? How many have read the majority opinion and the dissents in Obergefell?

How many, instead, are relying upon others' interpretations or fragments of arguments from Facebook? How does a mind formed by "scrolling," "browsing" and "surfing"—the lingua franca of online citizenship—wrestle with the nuances of constitutional law or the layeredness of the Catholic theological tradition?

I'm not suggesting that pre-Internet and pre-social media, typical Americans were digesting Supreme Court opinions and papal encyclicals, thumbing through Funk & Wagnalls to look up allusions and check footnotes. But I'm fascinated by the growing contrast between the fare we often encounter online—quick, flashy, brief, heavily framed by advertising—and the length and complexity of a Supreme Court opinion and papal encyclical. I'm also concerned that people are so quick to deliver an opinion they never encounter the document on its own terms, letting it challenge, provoke and enlighten, even in the face of disagreement.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
L J
2 years 4 months ago
I am reading the encyclical, Laudato Si, in Spanish, as written by the Holy Father in my native tongue. I am 1/3 of the way through it, taking the time to highlight and underline key sentences that resonate with me as a medical scientist. I find myself defending Laudato Si and Pope Francis to friends both on the Right and on the Left. None of them have read the document, depending instead on a skewed analysis by their favorite ideological commentators. In as such these friends balk when I challenge them. The latter would entail they do some introspection and work. Reading Laudato Si is a joy compared to the years of reading arduous encyclicals by Pope John Paul II. Deo Gratias for Pope Francis! Our first world inhabitants have shown themselves to personify Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy in his "Inferno" with the cardinal sins of Lust, Gluttony, Greed, Sloth, Wrath and now Pride. "Whatever Became of Sin", Dr Karl Menninger, MD, once asked in the early 70s. No surprises here. Thus I pray my rosary daily with more fervor asking God to melt our harden hearts in America.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Participants at the recent plenary assembly approved a petition requesting the pope to waive the “monitum” issued by the Holy Office in 1962.
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 21, 2017
If the tragic revelations of the Catholic Church’s sex abuse crisis are any guide, the process of reckoning with problems that have been avoided for decades will itself take decades.
The EditorsNovember 21, 2017
“Coco” is—despite its otherworldly elements—a realistic look into love, family and tradition.
Olga SeguraNovember 21, 2017
Since becoming pope, Francis has given special attention to the Holy See’s diplomatic staff. 
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 21, 2017