Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Matt EmersonJune 18, 2014
Veronica Royal teaches iconography at her parish and home, promoting an ancient craft and infusing students with a sense of sacred art. (CNS photo/Nancy Phelan Wiechec)

Outside of theology teachers, I think few of my colleagues have more difficulty getting students to appreciate the value of their subject than those who teach art. A core group of students tend to love art, but many (if not most) find art too subjective, too abstract, and not sufficiently practical. 

I hope, then, that this news from the Wall Street Journal will be of some encouragement to art educators as they evangelize their craft:

Viewing paintings engages a number of different regions of the brain, suggesting art appreciation is a natural biological process, according to the report in the June issue of the journal Brain and Cognition. The study found that paintings activated areas of the brain involved in vision, pleasure, memory, recognition and emotions, in addition to systems that underlie the conscious processing of new information to give it meaning.
 

In the words of WSJ, the "human brain is built for art appreciation . . ."

The way this report describes it, it seems that the brain exists, in part, for art; for the appreciation of the beautiful. I am speculating here, but I wonder if the structures of the brain themselves evolved in response to the existence of the beautiful in nature.

Putting aside that question, I wonder: If our brains are built for art appreciation, why do so many find the subject so uninteresting? And how would the culture be different if we emphasized art as much as we do math?

And as I think about those questions, I think of others: Do all paintings activate the brain similarly? For example, does a piece from Salvador Dali elicit something different in the brain than something from Norman Rockwell?

Can any readers provide insight?

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Marie Rehbein
11 years ago
Art appreciation is not exactly the same thing as art class. It seems that students might not like sitting a classroom memorizing things about someone else's art in order to be tested on that knowledge. Furthermore, unless they are skilled, they might not appreciate someone evaluating their art for a grade. Art instruction is poorly done in a lot of places where the "art teacher" is not actually able to do any art, but fills a gap in the faculty by teaching this "easy" subject in order to earn more pay.

The latest from america

What is happening to migrants in courtrooms across the country is a complete embarrassment to the justice system and an affront to human dignity.
Being a kid in the summer is all about existing in an eternal present moment, a feeling of freedom and potential that it will never go away.
John DoughertyJuly 11, 2025
Father Thomas Hennen, vicar general of the Diocese of Davenport, Iowa, has been appointed Bishop of Baker, Oregon.
OSV NewsJuly 11, 2025
My writing during these past five years is filled with memories of my long journey with God over a lifetime; but very significantly, it is the expression of my prayer at this later time of my life.