Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Matt EmersonJune 18, 2014
Veronica Royal teaches iconography at her parish and home, promoting an ancient craft and infusing students with a sense of sacred art. (CNS photo/Nancy Phelan Wiechec)

Outside of theology teachers, I think few of my colleagues have more difficulty getting students to appreciate the value of their subject than those who teach art. A core group of students tend to love art, but many (if not most) find art too subjective, too abstract, and not sufficiently practical. 

I hope, then, that this news from the Wall Street Journal will be of some encouragement to art educators as they evangelize their craft:

Viewing paintings engages a number of different regions of the brain, suggesting art appreciation is a natural biological process, according to the report in the June issue of the journal Brain and Cognition. The study found that paintings activated areas of the brain involved in vision, pleasure, memory, recognition and emotions, in addition to systems that underlie the conscious processing of new information to give it meaning.
 

In the words of WSJ, the "human brain is built for art appreciation . . ."

The way this report describes it, it seems that the brain exists, in part, for art; for the appreciation of the beautiful. I am speculating here, but I wonder if the structures of the brain themselves evolved in response to the existence of the beautiful in nature.

Putting aside that question, I wonder: If our brains are built for art appreciation, why do so many find the subject so uninteresting? And how would the culture be different if we emphasized art as much as we do math?

And as I think about those questions, I think of others: Do all paintings activate the brain similarly? For example, does a piece from Salvador Dali elicit something different in the brain than something from Norman Rockwell?

Can any readers provide insight?

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Marie Rehbein
9 years 9 months ago
Art appreciation is not exactly the same thing as art class. It seems that students might not like sitting a classroom memorizing things about someone else's art in order to be tested on that knowledge. Furthermore, unless they are skilled, they might not appreciate someone evaluating their art for a grade. Art instruction is poorly done in a lot of places where the "art teacher" is not actually able to do any art, but fills a gap in the faculty by teaching this "easy" subject in order to earn more pay.

The latest from america

The 12 women whose feet were washed by Pope Francis included women from Italy, Bulgaria, Nigeria, Ukraine, Russia, Peru, Venezuela and Bosnia-Herzegovina.
"We, the members of the Society of Jesus, continue to be lifted up in prayer, in lament, in protest at the death and destruction that continue to reign in Gaza and other territories in Israel/Palestine, spilling over into the surrounding countries of the Middle East."
The Society of JesusMarch 28, 2024
A child wounded in an I.D.F. bombardment is brought to Al Aqsa hospital in Deir al Balah, Gaza Strip, on March 25. (AP Photo/Ismael abu dayyah)
While some children have been evacuated from conflict, more than 1.1 million children in Gaza and 3.7 million in Haiti have been left behind to face the rampaging adult world around them.
Kevin ClarkeMarch 28, 2024
Easter will not be postponed this year. It will not wait until the war is over. It is precisely now, in our darkest hour, that resurrection finds us.
Stephanie SaldañaMarch 28, 2024