Third Sunday of Lent Time: Year B

The first reading provides the ten commandments, still familiar to many who will hear the passage.  Unless the shorter Lectionary option is chosen (please not!) it is evident at once how uneven is the attention or space given to the various commandments.  The “firstborn” gets the lion’s share of biblical attention, prompting us, perhaps, to give it special preaching focus.  How is God one?  What does God’s oneness mean? This is a great mystery always, and here let’s think of three moments where that reality is particularly challenging.

It was, scholars are concluding, difficult and counter-intuitive for Israel to maintain the one-ness and alone-ness of Yahweh, given that in the ancient Near East, virtually no other deity was understood in that way.  How was Israel to approach God when God was non embodied and not related with other deities?  We might get some sense of what would be involved if we contrast the most sensuous and lavish liturgy we have attended with a Quaker meeting. 

Advertisement

As Christianity gradually differentiated itself from Judaism, similar questions were surely raised.  How was it possible to maintain the oneness of God, given some of the statements by and about Jesus by those who came to know him?  We know that philosophy and language as well as other human experience struggled with this challenge.  We may also know that in some Jewish circles, Christians are not considered monotheists as a result of some of those formulations.

And in our own era, at the turn of another millennium, postmodern science and cosmology offer fresh ways to understand how the Creator exists in relation to creatures, how divinity is to be understood in relation to other life.  How does the God of biblical Revelation correlate with these new ways of imaging the divine?  Not an easy conversation, nor a simple one.

We may have learned the first commandment when we were young, but to continue to probe it fruitfully and receive insight is still an absorbing challenge for us.

Barbara Green, O.P.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
9 years 7 months ago
This commentary is brief but offers deep reflection. So applicable in our contemporary perspective offering us so many distracting options to claim our attention and even our 'worship''. I appreciate Barbara Green OP's contributions.(e.g. her November one on All Souls/All Saints was excellent. Thank you and keep them coming.

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018