Physician Assisted Suicide Legislation Comes to California

Brittany Maynard is pictured with husband, Dan Diaz, in this undated photo (CNS photo/Reuters).

On Monday the California State Senate’s Appropriations Committee sent The End of Life Option Act (SB 128) on for assessment of its possible fiscal impact.

Co-authored by State Assembly woman Susan Talamantes Eggman, State Senator Lois Wolk and Senate Majority Leader Bill Monning, SB 128 would allow Californians with a terminal illness and six months or less to live (as confirmed by two physicians) to request a prescription for medication that would allow them to die.  Similar bills have been proposed in California on six previous occasions, but the groundswell of support this time around is quite strong. Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz and Alameda Counties and most recently the Los Angeles City Council all have already called for the bill’s passage, as has U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein.

Advertisement

Last autumn, terminally ill California native Brittany Maynard, 29, brought new attention around the world to the question of physician-assisted suicide or death, with her YouTube videos and news interviews about her desire to be able to legally end her life in the face of a painful, inoperable brain tumor. “The way that my brain cancer would take me is terrible,” she said on one occasion. “I am not suicidal.... I do not want to die. But I am dying. And I want to die on my own terms.”

Since Maynard’s death 23 states plus the District of Columbia have proposed similar legislation. Various forms of physician-assisted death have already been made law in Oregon and Washington (by ballot) and Vermont (by legislation). Montana and one county in New Mexico also permit physician assistance in the ending of one’s life as a result of court decisions. (You can read America's recent editorial on the subject here.)

For Ned Dolejsi, Executive Director of the California Catholic Conference, a major concern is the way such legislation will end up affecting the most vulnerable in California communities. “I think it will affect health care situations over time,” he explains. “We’re in the most competitive health care market in the world. Twelve million of the state’s thirty nine million people and rising are on MediCal right now, and we’ve got millions more on subsidized health care. And yet we don’t think there’s going to be any subtle pressures [on poor people when they’re terminally ill]”?

Even for those who say they want such legislation for themselves, Dolejsi insists further consideration is required. “People should stop and think. We try to live in this delusion that this is about some objective, autonomous decision that will be made free from the pressure that occurs when we’re in this dependent position of having been given a terminal illness. But that is a fantasy.”

“We think we can control this, but the trajectory on issues of justice and life in this country are not too good.”

Since first presenting the legislation in late January, co-author Senator Bill Monning has had what he describes as a “very cordial and respectful” meeting with Monterey Bishop Richard Garcia and Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez. “We [wanted to] acknowledge that this is an issue of importance to the Catholic Church,” says Monning, “and [that] our intent was not to challenge Church doctrine.”

Monning argues that the legislation involves “a very limited universe of people” and includes many layers of protection against abuse, including requirements that two separate doctors agree that the patient has less than six months to live; a private session between the patient and a doctor to ensure that the patient is mentally competent and not feeling pressured; insistence that insurance companies cannot limit or modify their care based on the reality of this option; and the insistence that this measure cannot be exercised on a broader basis, such as age or disability.

Monning notes that the law also requires both doctors to walk the patient through all other palliative care, hospice care and pain management options. “We don’t see this as the only option,” says Monning, “but as part of a range of options.”

Speaking to that range, Doctor Joseph Rotella, chief medical officer of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, whose members include nearly 5,000 palliative and hospice care medical professionals nationwide, notes that while the AAHPM is “very much neutral on whether the practice should be legalized and whether physicians should participate”, its members find the “bigger issue [to be] that there are a great deal of people who need high quality palliative care or hospice but don’t get it.” 

Rotella notes, though hospice care has been available via Medicare for decades, half of those who could use it never get it, and half of those do use it have it for three weeks or less. Likewise, many who could benefit from palliative care do not receive it.

“We look at this,” says Rotella, “and say the real high quality health crisis is to make available quality palliative care for all, rather than focus on the small number of people who get it and it’s not enough.”

Concern about pain management has long been a major topic in conversations about the benefits of assisted suicide. Intriguingly, Oregon and Washington’s surveys of those who choose to use life-ending medication consistently indicate that pain or fear of pain is not a major factor in their decision.  According to Oregon’s 2014 report, since the law went into effect in 1998 91.5 percent have expressed a loss of autonomy as a major concern; 89 percent have pointed to their inability to do things they enjoy, 80 percent to their loss of dignity and 40 percent to the fear of being a burden to family, friends and caregivers. Only 25 percent have expressed concern about pain.

Retired Methodist minister Reverend D. Ignacio Castuera, who serves on the board of Compassion and Choices, a main national advocacy group for what they designate “Death with Dignity” legislation, argues that these laws serve to put the poorest members of the California community on an equal footing with the wealthiest. He recalls “seeing situations where families were very much drawn into all kinds of desperate moves in order to assist a person in their family,” while wealthier parishioners could travel to countries like Switzerland or get medical professionals to help in one way or another.

Castuera refuses to be swayed by the kinds of unintended consequences of which Dolejsi and others warn. “It hasn’t happened in Oregon in seventeen years,” he argues. “And there’s never going to be enough proof for those who think it’s going to be a risk.”

(In contrast, the stated position of the United Methodist Conference is that “We reject euthanasia and any pressure upon the dying to end their lives. God has continued love and purpose for all persons, regardless of health. We affirm laws and policies that protect the rights and dignity of the dying.”)

Similarly, Stockton Bishop Stephen Blaire says the real question is how to enable people to fully appreciate their death. “Dying is a religious moment,” he explains, “and we want to help people to die fully as a human being.” Pain is something that can and should be managed; “we believe very much in palliative care.” But at the same time, “To think we can be free of every suffering is also not possible. We don’t promote suffering, but we do try to help people find meaning and significance in it.”

“I think we have to show that as a church we see the meaning of death—that it has significance, that for us it’s a transition, an end to our human existence, but a transition to a new and eternal life.”

The California Senate must pass SB 128 by June 15 for it to move forward to the State Assembly. The Assembly would then have to pass it by September 11th for it to become state law.

(In the coming weeks I will post again on the issues surrounding assisted suicide and the challenges posed by the most recent legislation for the Catholic Church.)

Correction: May 13, 2015

A previous version of this article said the California Senate must pass SB 128 by June 11. The correct deadline in June 5.

The number of states that have proposed physician assisted suicide legislation since the death of Brittany Manyard was misidentified as 20. Twenty-three states plus the District of Columbia have proposed similar legislation.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
William Atkinson
3 years 5 months ago
One of my companions, who's father and mother lived in Oregon, his father was having serious bouts with liver and other diseases, yet he was still able to go camping, outdoor stuff and enjoy his grown children, their families and friends; he was only 54 when he and his wife decided to allow him to die when he had his next sever attack, Under Oregon law that was his and his wife's decision, and doctors removed all supporting aids, including oxygen, also stopped feeding him and water, providing drugs to ease the starvation pains, he lingered in the hospice for 16 days, visited by his children and then died. His children haven't to this day forgiven their mom for taking (they say forcing her husband) to take his own life. The family has been destroyed, their mom has moved on to a new husband and life. The life insurance company disputes the death and still calls it a suicide. The destruction of a life, family and estate of a dearly loved on and nuclear family wasn't worth the pain of this decision. There now is distrust, hatred, unforgiveness where there once was love of a very close family.

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018