Northern Ireland may be a small part of the U.K., but it will suffer the severe consequences

In the months leading up to the Brexit referendum, few people in Ireland truly believed that Britain would vote to leave the European Union. That’s not to say there was complacency; possible scenarios played out on our national media for months, while the Irish government treaded a fine line between persuasion and meddling in an attempt to sway the 500,000 Irish people residing in the United Kingdom to vote Remain.

Now that the full weight of reality has fallen, a low-level anxiety has once again taken hold over the future of Northern Ireland, which, like Scotland, voted to remain in Europe but was outvoted by England and Wales. Seizing the moment, Sinn Féin’s Martin McGuinness, deputy first minister for Northern Ireland, called for a poll on Irish reunification, saying the North was being dragged from Europe on the tails of England.

Advertisement

Theresa Villiers, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, who has the ability to call the poll, was quick to dismiss the idea. The Good Friday agreement, which created peace in Northern Ireland, only allows for a border poll when there’s widespread public support for a united Ireland. In the post-Brexit uncertainty, few are looking to prod the already delicate peace process.

Perhaps the most worrying prospect for Northern Ireland, aside from the post-Brexit economic hit, is the reintroduction of border controls with the Republic. In a recent policy paper, academics at Durham and Newcastle Universities said there was “virtually no possibility” that the border could remain without controls. In the lead-up to the vote, bishops in Northern Ireland warned that border controls would be psychologically dangerous, undermining relationships and creating a visual division not seen since the height of The Troubles.

Those in the Leave campaign sought to ease fears by insisting that a border would not be introduced and the common travel area would remain. But this assurance is undermined by the central driving force of their campaign: controlling immigration. If their aims are sincere, a heavily policed border between the Republic and the North will be necessary. For a new generation that doesn’t remember militarized borders, it is an alien and frightening concept. For those who lived through it, it is a visual reminder of a fear and oppression that Ireland has worked very hard to leave behind.

One of the main failures of the Remain campaign was to center its argument on the economy, which did little to address the emotional, deep-rooted and ideological motivations to leave. Many people outside the economic centers in the United Kingdom feel left behind by the system, alienated from the bureaucratic elites in Brussels and threatened by slow growth and inward migration. In the days since Brexit, disturbing images of racism towards immigrants in the United Kingdom have appeared on social media, demonstrating the deep tensions that Brexit has dug up. Brexit could further stir the existing tensions in Northern Ireland once the country begins the process of separating further from the Republic.

It’s unfair to write about Northern Ireland in purely negative terms, given that it has thrived and grown despite the darkest of times. But in the political drama and market turmoil, Northern Ireland must not be an afterthought in the Brexit negotiations. It may be a small part of the United Kingdom, but it will suffer the most severe consequences. It is everyone’s responsibility, including the Republic of Ireland and Europe, to ensure that any border fits the more-hopeful present and doesn’t bring us back to a painful past.

Rhona Tarrantis America's Dublin correspondent.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
William Rydberg
1 year 4 months ago
Equating Brexit with the historically loaded term "Partition"? Orchestration of Irish public opinion against political decisions made democratically who knows? Take a look at the European Constitution, it doesn't even recognize God in spite of the Pope's many Interventions. Such an omission is hardly an oversight, something in my opinion that Ireland's Founders of a few short generations ago would never... How about an article from America explaining what the impact of excluding the mention of God from the European Constitution has on post-modernistic Bureacracy is warranted? It's big and affects Catholicism Major... It's been said thatIreland's current Depression was forced on its Government because of mismanagement at continental banks. Perhaps an article is warranted here in America Magazine that looks at all perspectives?
Steven Reynolds
1 year 4 months ago
It is a good idea to not forget NI in the Brexit discussion and quite appropriate to bring up its particular sensitivities. NI voted 56% remain, but the mix by district was perhaps predictably sectarian based on a look at more detail level voting (see bbc.com). Foyle (Derry) was 4th highest in all of UK with 78% remain. The border areas were in 60s and West Belfast came in at 74%. With an identity that looks to the Republic of Ireland, they favor the EU with both UK and Ireland as members. Compare West and East Belfast, the latter voting 51% leave, or more obviously North Antrim at 62% leave. Here we see an English identity and so the liberation from Europe vision was more appealing. Obviously the tensions remain and the post-June 23 referendum play out occur in that environment.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

A 14-year-old boy receives medical treatment at Suez Canal University hospital in Ismailia, Egypt, Friday, Nov. 24, 2017, after he was in injured during an attack on a mosque (AP Photo/Amr Nabil).
The pope described the attack as a “wanton act of brutality directed at innocent civilians gathered in prayer.”
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 24, 2017
“The Senate proposal is fundamentally flawed as written and requires amendment,” said Bishop Frank J. Dewane in a Nov. 22 letter to senators.
Pope Francis greets people at the “Regional Hub,” a government-run processing center for migrants, refugees and asylum seekers, in Bologna, Italy, Oct. 1. (CNS photo/L’Osservatore Romano)
Although he named no countries, Vatican observers believe he is referring especially to political leaders in several western and eastern European countries.
Gerard O’ConnellNovember 24, 2017
For Thanksgiving, we give you an inside look into what Jesuit basketball teams to watch out for this season.
Olga SeguraNovember 24, 2017