We're not Anti-Catholic, but...

Michelle Bachmann's former church, the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS) has officially weighed in on the recent controversy surrounding their teaching that the pope is the Antichrist. The church's president, Rev. Mark Schroeder, writes:

WELS holds to the historic Lutheran position that the Roman Catholic papacy fits the biblical characteristics of the Antichrist. We do this without reservation and without apology. We believe that our doctrines cannot be tempered by political correctness or modified to align with changing culture or public opinion.


Schroeder then goes on to give a theological justification for the view, maintaining that labeling the pope the Antichrist is really an act of "love." To wit: "Testifying to the errors that still exist in Catholic doctrine is itself an expression of love; remaining silent or glossing over doctrinal differences would express the opposite."

Despite these rather, well, emphatic views, Schroeder maintains that neither Bachmann nor WELS can be taken as anti-Catholic. Hmmm. 

Somehow I don't think this is going to resolve the issue.

Timothy O'Brien, SJ

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
ed gleason
6 years 10 months ago
Don't we ALL have problems with 'mouthy' hierarchs?  )-:
Kathryn Anderson
6 years 10 months ago
''Testifying to the errors that still exist in Catholic doctrine is itself an expression of love; remaining silent or glossing over doctrinal differences would express the opposite.''

In fairness, this reminds me of the best explanation I've heard for why we don't offer non-Catholic Christians communion:  because to do so would be to pretend our churches are in communion and to ignore the legitimate differences that exist between our communities; i.e. to act as if the concerns, qualms, and consciences of BOTH sides aren't valid.

Still, I don't go around calling Thomas Monson, the president of the LDS church, or Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori the Antichrist.
Adam Rasmussen
6 years 10 months ago
I don't really expect the general public and media to get the difference (sorry), but I think there is a difference between theological anti-Catholicism (as exemplified in an extreme way by Jack Chick, for example) and political or social anti-Catholicism (as exemplified by Nativism and such). The WELS is anti-Catholic only in the former sense. It doesn't follow that they are bigoted toward Catholics or hate them or anything like that. To me, from a political standpoint, it should be a non-issue. It doesn't matter whether political candidates believe that the papacy is the Anti-Christ, let alone that their church, but not they themselves, believes it.
6 years 10 months ago

This is an interesting topic and one that should be explored more.  I was really commenting, tongue in cheek,  and that the only reason we are discussing this is so we can associate Michelle Bachmann with anti Catholicism.  
Kang Dole
6 years 10 months ago
The actual statement from the WELS president is interesting. His point is that his church's views on the pope as antichrist are rooted in their foundational uses of the Bible and the Lutheran Confessions

He says:

''WELS holds to the historic Lutheran position that the Roman Catholic papacy fits the biblical characteristics of the Antichrist. [...] WELS draws all of its teachings from the Bible. ''By Scripture alone'' was one of the major themes of the Lutheran Reformation, and WELS has not retreated from that core belief.''
He then goes on to reference the Lutheran Confessions as lending support to the labeling of the pope as antichrist.
It seems pretty clear to me that it's the latter (the Confessions) that are really what's at play here. It's interesting that Schroeder doesn't cite either the biblical or the Reformation texts (how often is it that a Sola Scriptura type doesn't litter his text with biblical citations?). Schroeder's failure to cite the actual Bible is striking, since I would argue that there is a huge disconnect between what the Bible actually has to say about the antichrist (really, antichrists) and the three points he makes in his statement.
The Bible says that antichrists deny the father and son, deny that Jesus is messiah, and deny that the messiah came in the flesh (1 Jn. 2:18-22, 1 Jn 4:3, 2 Jn 1:7).
Now, I suppose that the authors of the Confessions extracted from these passages some reading that fit their need to denigrate the pope, and I suppose that the WELS also has this in mind. The thing is, it seems as though there is no small amount of room available for them to revisit this reading and, looking to justification from their claims about the role of the Bible as primary, ditch their statements on the pope. 
I doubt that the WELS will do this, but this situation just draws out for me the shakiness of Sola Scriptura claims, and reminds me how much traveling a concept like ''antichrits'' can do between the 1st and 21st centuries.
Brendan McGrath
6 years 10 months ago
I'll copy and paste below what I posted the last time this issue came up; perhaps it'll get more of a response this time:

I have to say, I personally get much more annoyed/offended/disheartened by the "new" anti-Catholicism that comes from liberal/secular sources than the old anti-Catholicism that which comes from Protestant/"conservative" sources - perhaps because I tend to be more liberal (but not of course secular) myself, so when the anti-Catholicism comes from liberals, it's sort of "my own people" who are "betraying" me.  Even more importantly, most of my fellow Northeast U.S. Catholics tend to be more liberal/Democratic too, and the liberal anti-Catholicism is more likely to influence them away from the Church.  (I.e., Catholicism and the Democratic party used to be more aligned, with Catholics attached to both, at least in the Northeast - now with the Democratic party is moving away from Catholicism the past several decades, Catholics are being tugged in two directions, and unfortunately, what snaps is often the attachment to the Church.) 
To put it another way - I was raised Democrat (I'm 29).  And growing up in grade school and high school, most of the Democrats I knew were also Catholic, or at least not hostile to Catholicism.  Now that's changing - and I guess I feel betrayed, though that's too strong a word.  (A similar experience - in high school, I was very much against homophobia, etc.  I still am, of course, but in college at Georgetown, when I observed many gay and lesbian people being hostile to the Church (though understandably), I felt... well, "betrayed" is too strong a word, but I felt very defensive.)
Anyway, the point of these ramblings is that I'm not really bothered by anti-Catholicism that comes from a Protestant/conservative source - if anything, it makes me wish that that was what we were still dealing with, rather than liberal/secular anti-Catholicism, since the former is less of a threat, and its presence reinforces rather than erodes the loyalty of Catholics to the Church.
I have to say it also annoys me to see more liberal/secular sources point to anti-Catholicism on the right, as if we're now supposed to get dutifully outraged by that, while said liberal/secular sources don't seem to think there's anything objectionable about their anti-Catholicism, and indeed, we're made to feel like we don't really have the "right" to be upset.
In short, I'd rather have the pope be called the anti-Christ than be called homophobic, misogynist, etc.
Brendan McGrath
6 years 10 months ago
Darn; it lumped together all the paragraphs - sorry about that.
6 years 10 months ago
For about 100 years, the Democratic party was mainly Catholics from the north and fundamentalist anti Catholics from the South.  Somehow they got along but now that Michelle Bachmann can be associated with a Lutheran Church that lists a proviso that had its origins from the 1500's we are ''shocked, shocked.''

Why has there been three threads on this?  Especially since as I pointed out that Southern Baptists have been far worse on the anti Catholic front for a long time.  Wait till Rick Perry gets into the race and it will be interesting to see what the authors do here with his very outward Evangelical identification. 


When I prepare something in a text editor, I use an extra paragraph return when I remember for the reasons you cited. 
Barry Moorhead
6 years 10 months ago
Sounds much like the verbal gymnastics of the church on LGBT issues.  We love you even though you are "objectively disordered".  And when it comes to basic human rights we will do everything to stand in your way because, deep down, we don't really consider you to be fully human.
Vince Killoran
6 years 10 months ago
Brendan hit the nail on the head when he wrote "[I]n college at Georgetown, when I observed many gay and lesbian people being hostile to the Church (though understandably), I felt... well, "betrayed" is too strong a word, but I felt very defensive.)."

"Understandably" indeed-I still can't figure out how you would feel "betrayed" when a group condemn as "disordered" took offense at Church teaching.  The Church can certainly be criticized;that's not being anti-Catholic.  The criticism I hear coming from the left side of the political spectrum goes to specific teachings on reproductive rights and sexuality.

Let's not distract from Bachmann's church's totalizing anti-Catholicism
6 years 10 months ago
Is the Catholic Church, anti Protestant or anti Muslim.   What if the official position of the Church towards these religions?   I realize that each emcompasses many variants.  Somewhere in the not so distant pass these were classified as heresies and if so is that just another way of calling them anti Christ?

Is this post a political one or a religioius one?  I am not a major proponent of Michelle Bachmann but Lutherans seem mild compared to what the Southern Baptist say or have said about Catholics and did we not have some Southern Baptists as presidents?
Inigo Hicks
6 years 10 months ago
Aren't all Protestants anti-Catholic?  Otherwise, Protestantism wouldn't exist.
Kathryn Anderson
6 years 10 months ago
@JR_Cosgrove, the Church's thinking on this has evolved.  First, heresies and schisms aren't the same as the singular Antichrist with a capital A.  Heretics and schismatics aren't in full communion with the Catholic Church, and can be seen as in opposition to (anti-) the Body of Christ (as has long been the case), but aren't THE Antichrist.

  It's worth noting that there's a difference between a Catholic leaving the Church, and removing him or herself from full communion, and people of faith who simply belong to other traditions.  The church doesn't teach that followers of other religions are outside of God's salvation. Non-Christians of goodwill who seek God and non-Catholic Christians can also be saved, though all are saved by the work of Christ through the Catholic Church. In other words, the official Church teaching is that the Catholic Church is the fullest, truest expression of God's love, salvation, and revelation for God's people, but other traditions are also blessed with many of God's graces.  I won't quote it all, but the Catechism #s 813-822 really say it well, and check out the Cathechism #776 for some beautiful words on the Church's role in salvation.


Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

A woman religious casts her ballot May 25 in Dublin as Ireland holds a referendum on its law on abortion. Voters went to the polls May 25 to decide whether to liberalize the country's abortion laws. (CNS photo/Alex Fraser, Reuters)
The repeal of Ireland's Eighth Amendment, which guarantees the right to life of the unborn, is passing by a 2-1 margin with most of the votes counted.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies at a House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Tuesday, May 22, 2018, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
The Secretary of Education stirred up controversy when she said it was up to schools to decide if an undocumented student should be reported to authorities.
J.D. Long-GarcíaMay 25, 2018
Thousands gathered in Dublin May 12 to say "Love Both" and "Vote No" to abortion on demand. They were protesting abortion on demand in the forthcoming referendum May 25. (CNS photo/John McElroy)
“Priests and bishops get verbal abuse by being told, ‘How can you speak for women? You don’t know what it’s like!’”
America StaffMay 25, 2018
The coffin containing the body of St. John XXIII is seen during a ceremony in Vittorio Veneto Square after its arrival in Bergamo, Italy, May 24. The body of the late pope left the Vatican on May 24 to be displayed in his home region until June 10. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)

BERGAMO, Italy (CNS) — Accompanied by Bishop Francesco Beschi of Bergamo and escorted by both Italian and Vatican police officers, the glass coffin containing the body of St. John XXIII left the Vatican early on May 24 for a 370-mile drive to Bergamo.