Two Campuses, Two Decisions

At the University of Notre Dame, gay and lesbian students will soon have a campus-wide organization responding to their needs, while the Catholic University of America announced yesterday it would not accept student-driven drive for such a group.

Notre Dame, following a months-long review process, announced that it would form a student organization supporting LGBTQ students and allies.

Fr. John Jenkins, CSC, the president of ND, told the school’s newspaper that the organization, “grows out of our mission as a Catholic university, it’s directed by that fundamental mission in a profound way.”

The program, Beloved Friends and Allies: A Pastoral Plan for the Support and Holistic Development of GLBTQ and Heterosexual Students at the University of Notre Dame, will include “training of appropriate student leaders, staff and faculty, and the education of all students, so as to create and sustain a safe and supportive environment for all members of the Notre Dame community,” according to its website.

Alex Coccia, a junior Africana and Peace Studies major at Notre Dame, told me that he and 7 other students submitted an application to the university for an LGBT-focused student club in February and were then involved in talks with student activities administrators during the review process that culminated with this announcement. He said that “the student body is generally very welcoming” but noted that some gay students on campus feel threatened by comments that stem mostly from ignorance, not malice, “like when someone says ‘that’s so gay’ and things like that.”

The University will hire a full-time administrator to oversee the organization and serve as a liaison between students and administration. The school stresses that the organization “adheres to the Church’s teaching concerning homosexual actions.” Coccia said this caveat was not a surprise, adding, “all Notre Dame students are called to live chastely.” He said that the group would not be engaged in any political advocacy, but instead serve as a “peer to peer support group” for students, hosting events such as academic panels, sensitivity training, and opportunities for socializing.

At The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., junior politics major Ryan Fecteau organized a group of LGBT students and allies last year into an unofficial student group called CUAllies. They had requested official club status from the school earlier this year, and after months of waiting, he was informed in a private meeting with the school’s president, John Garvey, and other student leaders that the school would not recognize the group.

A press release from CUAllies says that administrators rejected the proposal, in part, because they feared the group could become an advocacy organization at odds with church teaching. Fecteau told me today that the group had spent the past several months demonstrating through its programming that this was not the goal of the organization.

He said he was disappointed in the school’s decision, but was hopeful that the conversation would continue on campus.

“I think it was disappointing because Notre Dame had just made their announcement the day before,” he said. “They took a big, bold step forward, and I thought that was a good sign for us at CUA. Unfortunately we were wrong.”

He’s hopefully that the situation will improve for LGBT students on campus. “We need something more than a statement saying students are welcome. Anything is better than nothing at this point. We got some dialogue out of the process,” he said. President Garvey’s “comments and his words made me feel that he was going to make an honest attempt to figure out something, though I don’t know what that will be.”

“We’re not giving up hope on this organization,” he said. “We’ll continue doing everything we’ve been doing before this decision” including hosting service days, faith reflection, support, and social activities.

 

PAUL SCHMID MR/MRS
4 years 7 months ago

 Thank you for bringing a balanced article on the topic.  I found it quite hopeful - in both decisions. Respect was shown by both parties.  Serious listening appeared to have occurred.  Reasoned missions were shared. Decisions were made.  The relationships continue on.  Remove the hype, and progress can be made - which I believe occurred at Notre Dame and Catholic University.  Different places with different journeys.  We have a lot to learn and look forward to, as these organizations and the issue evolve. The Church and its institutions need to address the needs of those who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and questioning in a loving and clear way.  This is not always easy for either individuals or organizations.  It does not require a yes to be "compassionate" or a no to be proper.  It may be in the nuance, the action in the discussion, the reponse to outcomes, and the doing of what is right and true, in time and place.  But with growth and partnership of institutions and student organizations, as a body of Christ with many parts, the difficult balance can and must be struck. Onward goes the dialogue.

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

An explosive device was detonated outside the offices of the Mexican bishops' conference, directly across the street from the country's most visited religious site, the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. walks from the Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 25, 2017, as he steers the Senate toward a crucial vote on the Republican health care bill. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Republican proposals “exclude too many people, including immigrants,” Bishop Frank J. Dewane said in a statement.
Without quite knowing it, I had begun to rely on the tradition of the Roman Catholic Church.
Elizabeth BruenigJuly 25, 2017
A demonstration for affordable health care in New York City on July 13. Bishop Frank J. Dewane of Venice, Fla., chairman of the U.S. bishops' Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, called on the Senate July 21 to fix problems with the Affordable Care Act in a more narrow way, rather than repeal it without an adequate replacement. (CNS photo/Andrew Gombert, EPA)
The sisters say that they are “most troubled by the cuts it would make to Medicaid by ending the Medicaid expansion and instituting a per capita cap [on spending].”