St. (That is, Stamp) Mother Teresa

David Gibson over at Politics Daily has a great piece on the "uproar" over the newly announced "Mother Teresa stamp."  Seems that some are objecting to her smiling visage gracing our letters and postcards.  And they're objecting for good reason.  The U.S. Postal Service's list of requirements for those who should appear on stamps includes this rather clear-cut restriction: "Stamps or stationery items shall not be issued to honor religious institutions or individuals whose principal achievements are associated with religious undertakings or beliefs."  The risibly named Freedom from Religion Foundation (named, I suppose, after one of the Four Non-Freedoms that Norman Rockwell famously commemorated in World War II) has used that restriction as an airtight argument opposing her.  Joe Carter at First Things takes a different tack, though: "Mother Teresa should certainly appear on a stamp -- but only after we change the law. We shouldn't look for loopholes that require denying the importance of her faith in order for her to qualify. Mother Teresa should be honored for who she really was -- a Catholic nun motivated by the love of Christ -- and not as a faux, secular saint."  

That makes sense, especially since, as Gibson notes, the Postal Service has honored The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who was, um, a religious leader, and Fr. Edward J. Flanagan of Boys Town fame.  According to the USPS, they're acceptable because they were not known primarily as religious leaders, which would have surprised Rev. King and Fr. Flanagan (not to mention their congregations).  And as Gibson notes, the Blessed Virgin Mary somehow slips through those religious restrictions every Christmas.  That pesky BVM!  His article says, tongue-in-cheekly, that perhaps she's seen primarily as a mom.  Or maybe just a painting.

But let's use an even simpler argument.  US stamps rightly honor deserving people, events, inventions, achievements and even landmarks.  And so the question: Does Mother Teresa live up to these high standards?  Can she, for example, be counted in the august company as the two estimable figures, public servants and international humanitarians already honored by the Postal Service who are pictured at right?

Advertisement

Give me a break.  Put her on the damn stamp already.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Murali Karamchedu
8 years 8 months ago
Based on the USPS guidelines, I wonder how one would interpret St. Francis of Assisi. This was a 20c stamp issued in 1982. Curiously, this stamp simply says Francis of Assisi, (in contrast, a similar stamp issued by the Govt. of India, in 1982 as well, says *St.* Francis of Assisi).
Webster Bull
8 years 8 months ago
Quoth the Wicked Witch of the West: What a world, what a world.

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018