Rush finds 'God' in Lord's Resistance Army

Here's more for my "reality once again outpacing satire" folder (h/t to David Gibson at dotcommonweal and The Lede). The president's recent decision to commit 100 U.S. military advisors to train Ugandan, Central African Republic and Congolese troops so they can, God willing, finally put an end to the reign of terror orchestrated over more than two decades by the psychotic Lord's Resistance Army has drawn critcism from the usual suspects. Now you can, I guess, make the case that this minor deployment is ill-advised or that there are better ways to track down the murderers, rapists and child molestors of the L.R.A., but rare is the man who could argue that it would be offensive to go after this "Christian" militia, since Lord=God and they purport to be resisting the Islamic hordes in Central Africa. Rare indeed. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you Rush Limbaugh:

In a segment of his radio show headlined, “Obama Invades Uganda, Targets Christians," he, natch, rebukes Obama for this vast overextension of the U.S. military, and then goes a little further down the road toward self-parody, helpfully explaining that the “Lord” referred to in their name is not someone named Lord, but “God."

Advertisement

Here's Rush, quoted The Lede from the N.Y. Times

"Now, up until today, most Americans have never heard of the combat Lord’s Resistance Army. And here we are at war with them. Have you ever heard of Lord’s Resistance Army, Dawn? How about you, Brian? Snerdley, have you? You never heard of Lord’s Resistance Army? Well, proves my contention, most Americans have never heard of it, and here we are at war with them. Lord’s Resistance Army are Christians. It means God.

"It means God." Yeah. No, not so much. Rush adds, “They are fighting the Muslims in Sudan. And Obama has sent troops, United States troops, to remove them from the battlefield, which means kill them. So that’s a new war, a hundred troops to wipe out Christians in Sudan, Uganda.”

If, like Rush, you have never heard of the L.R.A. before, here's a sample of their fine work (I used my extensive research skills to extract this from their Wikipedia entry): "On December 25, 2008, the LRA massacred 189 people and abducted 120 children during a concert celebration sponsored by the Catholic church in Faradje, Democratic Republic of the Congo, continuing the attack on December 26. Shortly afterwards, the LRA struck three additional communities: 75 people killed in a church north of Dungu, and the church burned; 48 people killed in Bangadi, and 213 people in Gurba. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimated the death toll as 189 in Faradje, Doruma and Gurba. However, Caritas International estimated the number of victims to be about 500."

You just can't make this stuff up anymore. I think Rush's grotesque attempt to spin this decision against Obama says less about how poorly informed even professional commentators on current events can be than it does about how craven and dysfunctional U.S. political culture has become. Anything to smear Obama as 2012 draws nigh. I've heard of politics making strange bedfellows but Rush L. and the L.R.A.? He needs to fire his researchers. Or hire some. Or something.

What should be of note here is that the decision to use U.S. military advisors in East Africa marks a second step, after the U.S. role in the multilateral air campaign over Libya, to practically engage the Responsibility to Protect, which U.S. and other Western powers accepted in 2005. That doctrine calls for coordinated international response (not necessarily a military one) to humanitarian or human rights catastrophies when the sovereign authority is incapable of responding itself or when that authority is itself the culpable force behind clear crimes against humanity. (See also "Libyan Freedom")

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Andrew Russell
6 years 1 month ago
Maybe Rash Lame-oh should have checked to see if Lord's Resistance Army meant resisting the Lord!
John Barbieri
6 years 1 month ago
Who cares about Rush Limbaugh?
Who denies the crimes of Lord's Resistance Army?
But, however well intentioned, using the armed forces of the United States to intervene in the internal affairs of a foreign country that posses no threat to our country is both foolish and dangerous.
Remember the ''advisors and trainers'' in Vietnam? Only too soon our forces were growing larger and doing more than ''advising and training.'' Did we learn anything? Obviously, our ''leaders'' didn't! What has the use of our forces in Iraq and Afghanistan accomplished?
New adventures abroad - other than to neutralize the enemies of the United States - are only invitations to more bloodshed and disaster.
 
Stanley Kopacz
6 years 1 month ago
Where's the oil?  There has to be oil or coltan or something.  The last ten years have left me justifiably paranoid.
Chris Vogel
6 years 1 month ago
Now, now, I wouldn't be too hard on poor old Rush.  Of course, he's a dingbat, but that's very Christian.  (Religion is evidence to the fact that some people are capable of believing anything at all.)  And, while it's true that the Lord's Resistance Army, among other things, engages child soldiers in committing breathtakingly brutal acts, is that so un-Christian?  It is only modern. secular governments that prevent their traditional response to difference:  torture and mass murder.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Father James Martin, S.J. and Ross Douthat at the Civility in America Part 1: Religion event held at The Sheen Center on Dec. 13th. (America/Antonio DeLoera-Brust).
Is there a duty for Christians to represent a certain kind of voice in the public discourse?
Angelo Jesus CantaDecember 14, 2017
A spokesman for the archdiocese described the meeting as “personal” in nature and aimed at “renewing a friendship that goes back 15 years or so.”
Michael J. O’LoughlinDecember 14, 2017
Black women cannot be expected to continue to save white people from the poor choices they make.
Anthea ButlerDecember 14, 2017
After a visit to Christ in the Desert, I knew it was not the monks whose lifestyle I should question.
Michael DauschDecember 14, 2017