Readings: Do Unto Others

Barack Obama has changed. About six years ago I stood two feet away from him in the St. Peter’s College, Jersey City Gym, which he had rented for a campaign rally, and watched him deal one by one with the crowd that squeezed around him and told myself that maybe this was the one we had been waiting for who might restore to America the character that George W. Bush had drained away.

In his major speeches — Inaugural Addresses, State of the Union, etc. and in his heart-felt campaign for gun control— he has come across as a Christian humanist, a man of compassion, deep feeling, high democratic ideals. But recently as the “war” president he has morphed into an indifferent, pragmatic utilitarian. The man who once taught Constitutional law seems to have forgotten the relationship between law and morality. He seems to have shelved the basic Christian principle of “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” which in philosophy resembles a rule from Immanuel Kant’s ethics, known as the categorical imperative: a valid moral principle is an unconditional law which applies to all human beings.

Advertisement

A number of articles, as well as two recent books, have called attention to this phenomenon. In The New Republic (May 13, reviewing Mark Mazzetti’s The Way of the Knife: The CIA, a Secret Army, and a War at the Ends of the Earth (Penguin), Jack Goldsmith describes the transformation of the CIA since 9/11, especially during the Obama administration, into “a killing machine, an organization consumed with man-hunting.” The CIA, says, Goldsmith, started using drones to kill the enemy because the Department of Defense was too slow, and the weapon they found was the Hellfire missile. Combined they could kill a target within seconds of spotting him. In Pakistan and Yemen the Obama administration has conducted almost 9 times more drone strikes since 9/11 than its predecessor.

But doubts are growing about both the tactics and the wisdom of this kind of war. General Stanley McCrystal recently told Foreign Affairs that this kind of covert operation-war seems “satisfying, clean, low risk.” But history provides no example of “a covert fix that solved a complex problem.” Pew Research studies show that “nearly all countries” oppose Obama’s drone policy. Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan and Pakistan now have a lower opinion of the United States than at the end of the Bush administration.

To an almost odd degree, President Obama has assumed responsibility for every drone assassination. I was personally appalled as it became clear that no attempt was made to arrest Osama bin Laden and bring him to trial. Even the Navy Seal who personally shot the unarmed Osama again and again told Esquire magazine this was either the greatest or worst moment of his life. In the aftermath the fact that Obama had killed bin Laden was touted as proof that Obama was a strong leader.

Combine this with the publication in The Nation (May 13) of an excerpt from Jeremy Scahill’s new book, The Dirty Wars, The World is a Battlefield, about how the United States killed three U.S. citizens in Yemen within one month in 2011.

Following the killing of Osama bin Laden, the White House proceeded down its list of “High Value Targets” to Anmar al-Awlaki, a New Mexico born American, Al Queda propagandist living in Yemen, sentenced to death without trial by President Obama. The president was so anxious to kill— not arrest— him that he would not let “collateral damage” interfere. So on the morning of September 30, as Awlaki and American Pakistani journalist Samir Khan, and cohorts piled into cars and drove out, drones with Hellfire missiles, with other aircraft and helicopters standing by, fired one into Awlaki’s car and a fireball burned their bodies beyond recognition.

Two weeks later, his American-born 16-year-old son Abulrahman, who had left his grandparents’ home without permission because he wanted to see his father, was, with a group of teen-agers having a barbeque, blasted to bits by drones. The U.S. offered no evidence to justify killing them.

Perhaps a year from now Al Queda will have drones that can zero in on prominent or just ordinary Americans. Operated from secret command posts abroad, they will hover over baseball fields, universities, shopping malls, and churches with Hellfire missiles of their own. The moral authority we think we once had as a democratic “City on the Hill” will have been compromised perhaps beyond recall. After all, when we kill the enemy’s innocent children, we have invited the enemy to do the same.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
ed gleason
5 years ago
Every time I hear about the evil drone policy, I mention that 15,000 French citizens died in the bombing and shelling in the Normandy invasion in 1944. No need to mention Dresden. If one wants to condemn drone weapons one must then condemn all offensive weapons that have a tendency to have collateral damage/killings..
PJ Johnston
5 years ago
As a matter of fact the just war tradition does condemn collateral damage as an example of violation of jus in bello criteria which are necessary for a military engagement to be just. Normandy isn't a good example for why drones satisfy just war criteria because Normandy is actually an example of the violation of just war criteria.
Vincent Gaitley
5 years ago
Drones hovering over baseball fields? Oh, dear. I always knew being a Phillies fan would kill me.
Stanley Kopacz
5 years ago
The french were killed in the process of liberating France. Are the Yemenis being killed for the liberation of Yemen? Even the mafia has the decency to have a hitman walk into a restaurant and use a handgun. Perhaps they should start using hellfire missiles. After the bombing in Boston, all I could think of is all the innocent bystanders we have killed with this blunt instrument and wanting it to stop. Enough.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

A woman religious casts her ballot May 25 in Dublin as Ireland holds a referendum on its law on abortion. Voters went to the polls May 25 to decide whether to liberalize the country's abortion laws. (CNS photo/Alex Fraser, Reuters)
The repeal of Ireland's Eighth Amendment, which guarantees the right to life of the unborn, is passing by a 2-1 margin with most of the votes counted.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies at a House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Tuesday, May 22, 2018, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
The Secretary of Education stirred up controversy when she said it was up to schools to decide if an undocumented student should be reported to authorities.
J.D. Long-GarcíaMay 25, 2018
Thousands gathered in Dublin May 12 to say "Love Both" and "Vote No" to abortion on demand. They were protesting abortion on demand in the forthcoming referendum May 25. (CNS photo/John McElroy)
“Priests and bishops get verbal abuse by being told, ‘How can you speak for women? You don’t know what it’s like!’”
America StaffMay 25, 2018
The coffin containing the body of St. John XXIII is seen during a ceremony in Vittorio Veneto Square after its arrival in Bergamo, Italy, May 24. The body of the late pope left the Vatican on May 24 to be displayed in his home region until June 10. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)

BERGAMO, Italy (CNS) — Accompanied by Bishop Francesco Beschi of Bergamo and escorted by both Italian and Vatican police officers, the glass coffin containing the body of St. John XXIII left the Vatican early on May 24 for a 370-mile drive to Bergamo.