Readings: Do Unto Others

Barack Obama has changed. About six years ago I stood two feet away from him in the St. Peter’s College, Jersey City Gym, which he had rented for a campaign rally, and watched him deal one by one with the crowd that squeezed around him and told myself that maybe this was the one we had been waiting for who might restore to America the character that George W. Bush had drained away.

In his major speeches — Inaugural Addresses, State of the Union, etc. and in his heart-felt campaign for gun control— he has come across as a Christian humanist, a man of compassion, deep feeling, high democratic ideals. But recently as the “war” president he has morphed into an indifferent, pragmatic utilitarian. The man who once taught Constitutional law seems to have forgotten the relationship between law and morality. He seems to have shelved the basic Christian principle of “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” which in philosophy resembles a rule from Immanuel Kant’s ethics, known as the categorical imperative: a valid moral principle is an unconditional law which applies to all human beings.


A number of articles, as well as two recent books, have called attention to this phenomenon. In The New Republic (May 13, reviewing Mark Mazzetti’s The Way of the Knife: The CIA, a Secret Army, and a War at the Ends of the Earth (Penguin), Jack Goldsmith describes the transformation of the CIA since 9/11, especially during the Obama administration, into “a killing machine, an organization consumed with man-hunting.” The CIA, says, Goldsmith, started using drones to kill the enemy because the Department of Defense was too slow, and the weapon they found was the Hellfire missile. Combined they could kill a target within seconds of spotting him. In Pakistan and Yemen the Obama administration has conducted almost 9 times more drone strikes since 9/11 than its predecessor.

But doubts are growing about both the tactics and the wisdom of this kind of war. General Stanley McCrystal recently told Foreign Affairs that this kind of covert operation-war seems “satisfying, clean, low risk.” But history provides no example of “a covert fix that solved a complex problem.” Pew Research studies show that “nearly all countries” oppose Obama’s drone policy. Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan and Pakistan now have a lower opinion of the United States than at the end of the Bush administration.

To an almost odd degree, President Obama has assumed responsibility for every drone assassination. I was personally appalled as it became clear that no attempt was made to arrest Osama bin Laden and bring him to trial. Even the Navy Seal who personally shot the unarmed Osama again and again told Esquire magazine this was either the greatest or worst moment of his life. In the aftermath the fact that Obama had killed bin Laden was touted as proof that Obama was a strong leader.

Combine this with the publication in The Nation (May 13) of an excerpt from Jeremy Scahill’s new book, The Dirty Wars, The World is a Battlefield, about how the United States killed three U.S. citizens in Yemen within one month in 2011.

Following the killing of Osama bin Laden, the White House proceeded down its list of “High Value Targets” to Anmar al-Awlaki, a New Mexico born American, Al Queda propagandist living in Yemen, sentenced to death without trial by President Obama. The president was so anxious to kill— not arrest— him that he would not let “collateral damage” interfere. So on the morning of September 30, as Awlaki and American Pakistani journalist Samir Khan, and cohorts piled into cars and drove out, drones with Hellfire missiles, with other aircraft and helicopters standing by, fired one into Awlaki’s car and a fireball burned their bodies beyond recognition.

Two weeks later, his American-born 16-year-old son Abulrahman, who had left his grandparents’ home without permission because he wanted to see his father, was, with a group of teen-agers having a barbeque, blasted to bits by drones. The U.S. offered no evidence to justify killing them.

Perhaps a year from now Al Queda will have drones that can zero in on prominent or just ordinary Americans. Operated from secret command posts abroad, they will hover over baseball fields, universities, shopping malls, and churches with Hellfire missiles of their own. The moral authority we think we once had as a democratic “City on the Hill” will have been compromised perhaps beyond recall. After all, when we kill the enemy’s innocent children, we have invited the enemy to do the same.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
ed gleason
5 years 8 months ago
Every time I hear about the evil drone policy, I mention that 15,000 French citizens died in the bombing and shelling in the Normandy invasion in 1944. No need to mention Dresden. If one wants to condemn drone weapons one must then condemn all offensive weapons that have a tendency to have collateral damage/killings..
PJ Johnston
5 years 8 months ago
As a matter of fact the just war tradition does condemn collateral damage as an example of violation of jus in bello criteria which are necessary for a military engagement to be just. Normandy isn't a good example for why drones satisfy just war criteria because Normandy is actually an example of the violation of just war criteria.
Vincent Gaitley
5 years 8 months ago
Drones hovering over baseball fields? Oh, dear. I always knew being a Phillies fan would kill me.
Stanley Kopacz
5 years 8 months ago
The french were killed in the process of liberating France. Are the Yemenis being killed for the liberation of Yemen? Even the mafia has the decency to have a hitman walk into a restaurant and use a handgun. Perhaps they should start using hellfire missiles. After the bombing in Boston, all I could think of is all the innocent bystanders we have killed with this blunt instrument and wanting it to stop. Enough.


The latest from america

An extraordinary minister of the holy Eucharist distributes Communion during Mass at Transfiguration Church in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn, N.Y. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
According to a report released by the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate at Georgetown University on Jan. 22, just 33 percent of bishops in the United States think the church “should” ordain women as deacons.
Michael J. O’LoughlinJanuary 22, 2019

When the poet Mary Oliver died last week at the age of 83, my social media feeds blossomed into a field of tributes.

Lisa AmplemanJanuary 22, 2019
Most of the undocumented immigrants who are in the United States have overstayed a visa and did not cross the border illegally, according to a new analysis from the Center of Migration Studies.
J.D. Long-GarcíaJanuary 22, 2019
The church is my home because my home was a domestic church.
Katie Prejean McGradyJanuary 22, 2019