A vigorous debate took place this morning among the cable news
squawkers about whether the results of yesterday’s election signal a sea-change in America’s attitudes toward race. Tucker Carlson claimed on MSNBC that it was "insulting" to suggest that America passed a moral test by voting for Obama, it being implied, he thought, that we would have failed that test if McCain had won.
Tucker’s logic is flawed. If America had voted for McCain, it may not have been because of Obama’s race, but it would have been hard to know. What we know with certainty this morning is that Obama’s race did not stand in the way and in that sense America did pass an important moral test. Racism is the besetting sin of American history. Perversely enshrined in our founding documents, it bedeviiied the early progress of the nation and brought about a bloody civil war, which spawned a legacy of hate that reached its climax just forty years ago. One could argue that Obama was the wrong choice for any number of reasons. But in making that choice Americans revealed themselves to be a people who have come to terms with their distinctly original sin and made possible a new moment of reconciliation.
Race & Yesterday
Show Comments ()
2
Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
16 years 6 months ago
Matt, We do not know what was in the hearts of the voters. The speculation from exit polls and other flawed information only leads to an uninformed analysis. The question of racism is inexplicable. It cuts both ways. Do we vote for competence and skill or the sense of affirmation for the historically challenged? It is too easy to suggest that we know why people made thier decisions. Mike
16 years 6 months ago
It strikes me that by continuing to employ Tucker Carlson, MSNBC is insulting the intelligence of the American electorate.
The latest from america
Working for the protection of people by safeguarding against the crime abuse is an integral expression of Christian faith. The successor of Pope Francis has the task of picking up where he left off and continuing resolutely. How can that be done?
Francis always encouraged me in our attempt to move forward as an ecumenical community and in welcoming young people from different churches who come to Taizé from all over the world. He was the pope, but also a father and a brother to me.
Pope Francis welcomed criticism—as long as it was not made behind his back.
The cardinals have asked Catholics to pray for them and the conclave. What exactly should we be praying for? And should we be scandalized by the intermingling of politics and spirituality?