Pope kicks up a storm ahead of UK visit

The UK media outcry over Pope Benedict's remarks Monday to the English and Welsh bishops caught me by surprise. 'Anger as Pope slams UK equality law' is the Press Association headline, which could stand for all the others. 

The Pope told the English and Welsh bishops in Rome:

Advertisement

Your country is well known for its firm commitment to equality of opportunity for all members of society. Yet as you have rightly pointed out, the effect of some of the legislation designed to achieve this goal has been to impose unjust limitations on the freedom of religious communities to act in accordance with their beliefs. In some respects it actually violates the natural law upon which the equality of all human beings is grounded and by which it is guaranteed. 

His words have been interpreted by the BBC and The Times and almost everyone else as referring to the Equality Bill now before Parliament, which consolidates the past 40 years of equality legislation by expanding rules stopping employers from discriminating against gay employees because of their sexuality. Churches and religious organisations are currently exempt from the legislation, but last week an amendment to the Bill aimed at closing that loophole. It was defeated in the House of Lords with help from the Anglican bishops who are also exposed to any expansion of the equality legislation.

But it as more likely that Pope Benedict was referring more generally to a series of laws enacted by Parliament implementing European anti-discrimination legislation, which have already resulted in the closure of Catholic adoption agencies.

Behind the row is a conflict between legal equality and religious freedom. And behind that is a dispute over the role of the state.

The Labor Government has increasingly adopted a secularist view more typical of the French than the English, one that  assumes that the state conditions society rather than the other way round. This conflicts with with the Church's view that the state should not attempt to impose any one cultural norm but should regulate the public sphere to ensure basic standards and fair play. Because the cultural norm in this case -- the view that gay unions are equal to marriage -- violates the Church's understanding of the human person, Pope Benedict's opposition is all the stronger.

Because gay rights are regarded as one of the great achievements of the Labor Government, the fury at that opposition has not been backward in coming forward. The National Secular Society (NSS) is mounting a broad protest movement ("Protest the Pope") against Benedict XVI's visit which includes secularists, gay groups, family planning organisations, pro-abortion groups and “anyone who feels under siege from the Vatican’s current militancy”.

While the Pope objects to the state imposing cultural norms alien to the Christian conception of the human person, the secularists object to the UK state ('Make the Pope pay') footing the estimated £20m cost of the papal visit. Their view is that the taxpayer is funding the visit of a foreign potentate whose bigotry flies in the face of British tolerance.

Add to this mix bruised Anglican sensibilities over the ordinariate proposal and a dash of traditional English distrust of Rome, and the visit starts to look distinctly exciting. There are many live wires involved, and Pope Benedict seems happy to trip over all of them. No wonder Ruth Gledhill, The Times religious correspondent, says today: "Pope Benedict XVI is a religion correspondent's total dream. What fantastic news he makes."

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
MARK CANALES
7 years 10 months ago
Is it possible for the shoes of the Fisherman to be on two left feet?
David Patrick
7 years 10 months ago
I'm really looking forward to hearing and then reading the speech to the members of parliament and the lecture at Oxford. You can bet that he's going to make sure that as many people as possible read either one, if not both. Given that he'll most probably be writing his next encyclical (On Faith) during the summer shortly before he visits the UK, to be released around Christmas this year, I'm sure his thoughts on meaning/reason vis-à-vis faith will be present throughout.
 
Etienne Bernard
7 years 10 months ago
"Because the cultural norm in this case - the view that gay unions are equal to marriage - violates the Church's understanding of the human person, Pope Benedict's opposition is all the stronger."
  In France, The Government made a bill -PACS- that would give some civil rights to gay unions. That bill did not treat them as equal to marriage. In spite of this fact, the Church strongly opposed it. I felt that for Church gays had (and have still) nothing but the right to live hidden.
William Lindsey
7 years 10 months ago
MC, you ask, "Is it possible for the shoes of the Fisherman to be on two left feet?"
 
That would be no mean feat, I think.
James Lindsay
7 years 10 months ago
I can see why the Church is running scared of civil marriage for gay people, since in Europe civil and religious ceremonies are often separate events - with the civil marriage occurring first followed by the religious blessing. Since marriages are the joining of families, it will be interesting to see what will happen when two Catholic families with gay children seek to be joined in the eyes of the Church - especially if these families are active in Church and parish life (like mine).

As I have said before, it is not the pressure from the outside that has the Church running scared - it is the pressure from within.
Gerald Azike
7 years 10 months ago
I have always wondered at the paradox called man. I say this because I always feel nauseated at the contradiction that has fraught so many of his action like the current one. There is the agitation for the equality of all, yet, the equality always turn out to be inequality in disguise otherwise, how do we explain the uproar that the homosexual rights of adoption and the Catholic Adoption Agency generated in the recent past. People claim they are free to have a union that is not capable of producing an offspring, yet under the name of equality, they want to adopt offspring of those that were produced by the bisexual union. If homosexuality is ok, let them adopt children produced by their union and not of bisexuals otherwise there is inequality between the two group.
Jim McCrea
7 years 10 months ago
MC:  the shoes of the fisherman are really on two RIGHT feet.  And that's not right as the opposite of wrong, either.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Father James Martin, S.J. and Ross Douthat at the Civility in America Part 1: Religion event held at The Sheen Center on Dec. 13th. (America/Antonio DeLoera-Brust).
Is there a duty for Christians to represent a certain kind of voice in the public discourse?
Angelo Jesus CantaDecember 14, 2017
A spokesman for the archdiocese described the meeting as “personal” in nature and aimed at “renewing a friendship that goes back 15 years or so.”
Michael J. O’LoughlinDecember 14, 2017
Black women cannot be expected to continue to save white people from the poor choices they make.
Anthea ButlerDecember 14, 2017
After a visit to Christ in the Desert, I knew it was not the monks whose lifestyle I should question.
Michael DauschDecember 14, 2017