The Pope and Martin Rhonheimer, Part II

This morning I e-mailed some questions to Father Matin Rhonheimer in Rome and received his kind reply a few minutes ago.

I asked him if Pope Benedict were aware of his controversial position on church teaching and the use of condoms in 2004's Tablet. He responds: "I published my article in The Tablet in Summer 2004 when Cardinal Ratzinger was still the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith. As such, he has certainly come to know about my article. Subsequently, I have published several articles on this issue in specialized journals. I suppose that in Rome my publications and the connected discussions have been followed."

Advertisement

Why has the pope decided now to address this issue: "About how the Holy Father came to address this topic and why he did it only now, I do not know. But as has been plausibly argued, the reactions to his remarks on AIDS and condoms during his last Africa trip might have convinced him that things must be clarified, that is, that the Church’s teaching on contraception does not imply a 'prohibition' of condom use by people engaged in immoral and high-risk life styles—as e.g. prostitutes—but that such a use might be at least a sign of some responsibility."

Does this repositioning on the use of condoms suggest any new thinking on contraception: "I think what the Pope said is clear and nothing can deduced from it which goes in the direction of weakening Paul VI.’s teaching, in 'Humanae vitae,' concerning contraception, or in the direction of advocating the systematic use of condoms as a means for fighting against the AIDS epidemic."

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Michael Barberi
7 years 6 months ago
Rhonheimer fails to consider the paradox that as the Church says that condom use is licit for male prostitues to prevent the spead of infection, it is illicit for a spouse who has AIDS to use a condom to prevent the spread of infection to the other spouse. The boundaries of prudent responsibility are contradictory. The moral species or specification of this external action (use of condom) in both cases is to prevent the spead of a disease to another person....which is a good and higher common good.  I will not go into detail about other philosophical arguments that point to the narrowness of thought in Humane Vitae, but the pope has opened a wide door for once again challenging this doctrine.
Joseph O'Leary
7 years 6 months ago
John Paul II's speech-writer, who is now the Cardinal Archbishop of Bologna, did say that the wife of a HIV+ man should continue to have sexual relations with him (fulfilling her marital duty) but should not use condoms; rather she should trust in Providence. Benedict seems to have put an end to this nonsense (40 years too late, of course).

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Chilean clerical sex abuse survivors Juan Carlos Cruz, James Hamilton and Jose Andres Murillo in Rome, May 2. The three met Pope Francis individually at the Vatican April 27-29. The Vatican announced on May 22 that a second group of abuse victims will visit the pope in June (CNS photo/Paul Haring).
The encounters will take place from June 1-3 at Santa Marta, the Vatican guesthouse where Francis lives.
Gerard O’ConnellMay 22, 2018
Pope Francis talks with Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley of Boston, president of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, as they arrive for a meeting in the synod hall at the Vatican in this Feb. 13, 2015, file photo. (CNS photo/Paul Haring) 
Righteous call-outs should be patterned after Cardinal O’Malley’s rebuke of Pope Francis on sex abuse.
Simcha FisherMay 22, 2018
In May, my cousin Christina and her husband Tyler were murdered in their home.
John J. ConleyMay 22, 2018
Follow Father Arturo Sosa's first visit to the Jesuits in Canada!
America StaffMay 22, 2018