Obama's Task: Find His Moral Voice

In his speech to Congress tonight, President Obama has to juggle many objectives, some of them seemingly contradictory. For example, he must continue to reach out to Republicans, cite one or two of the ideas they brought to the table that he is endorsing himself, and hold out the hope that the eventual reform will be bipartisan. But, at the same time, he must rally the Democratic Party, the liberals in safe districts as well as the Blue Dogs from conservative, swing districts.

The primary way – no, the only way – to achieve this rallying of the Democratic Party’s different ideological components is to state the moral argument for health care reform and, specifically, for government involvement in that reform. This argument is only partly about insuring those who currently lack health insurance, although the moral argument for the reform’s universality is the most accessible. The problem politically is that plenty of Americans who have insurance and are happy with it think they are going to end up paying to insure those currently uninsured through higher taxes. He must state again that those with insurance pay for those without it today, they just pay for it in an irrational manner, through the hidden costs and rising premiums of unnecessary visits to the emergency room by the uninsured. This fiscal dynamic points to a deeper moral reality: We are Americans and we are all in this together, whether the issue is fixing health care, prosecuting the war in Afghanistan, or coping with the out-year budget deficits. During the campaign, when candidate Obama gave voice to such sentiments, he received the loudest and most sustained applause of any applause lines.


The rationale for government intervention in the health care insurance market has many moral attributes. It is immoral, albeit profitable, to deny people coverage because of pre-existing conditions. It is immoral, albeit profitable, for insurance companies to hire teams of lawyers to help them avoid paying benefits because of some loophole in the fine print. But, at a deeper level, the mistrust of government, while healthy in some regards is also immoral. These latter-day patriots who worry about the Second Amendment and show up with guns at events where the President is scheduled to speak have nothing in common with the Minutemen who assembled on the Green at Lexington on a chill April morning. Government is not some alien force and our government is not a foreign monarchy, unanswerable to the will of the people. Medicare may or may not be "socialized medicine" but it has lengthened the life expectancy of the citizenry and immeasurably improved the final years of millions of Americans. Medicare is government-run health care.

If anything, the problem with Congress is that it is too malleable in the face of popular opinion and instead of shaping it, they allow themselves to be terrified by it. August was not, as some have said, an exercise in democracy. Town hall meetings were disrupted by organized conservative groups who had every right to disrupt those meetings. But, say every member of Congress had five town hall meetings and each meeting had 300 people. (I think those estimates are generous.) And, let us stipulate that every single person who attended those meetings was opposed to any further government involvement in health care. That would mean that 1,337,500 people showed up in August to tell their congressman to vote against health care reform. Last autumn, 69,498,952 citizens voted for Barack Obama.

The President tonight must connect the health care reform provisions he will be advocating in the days and weeks ahead with the call for change the voters endorsed last year. And, he must especially re-assure the centrist swing voters that while change is often scary, nothing is scarier than maintaining the status quo in health care. He must also re-assure Catholic swing voters that he is committed to keeping health care reform neutral on the issue of access to abortion. The President faces a tall order tonight, but the only way to hit a homerun in his address is to return to the great moral themes of his campaign. That is why he won last year and it is how he can win this year.





Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
9 years 4 months ago
Re: "he is committed to keeping health care reform neutral on the issue of access to abortion"
Being neutral to an evil e.g. access to abortion is not a good thing.  Is our moral compass so warped that we cannot strive after something benefittig our human dignity, not to mention our heritage as adopted children of God?  In matters as atrocious as killing an innocent human being, we have to be more than neutral.
9 years 4 months ago
In 1966 graduating from Medical School we said the Hippocratic oath-so since about 350 BCE physicians have abhored abortion.  Certainly it is also abhorent, as a physician now in 2009 ACE to weekly see and know of people who die because of lack of health insurance in the richest country in the world. Health care reform at least can save those thousands.  A society is judged by how it helps the orphas and widows.  Our democracy is dying of a ''supra capitalism'' with trans national coporations whose bottem lIne is only profit, not human flourishing.  Yet our constittion now say coporations have the same constitutional rights as persons.  Actually God creates each person, goverments create corpoations through laws.  The money end of the practice of medicine must be regulated for human good, not corpoate profits or even hundreds of thousands more real person suffer. Please join Obama in diminishing this suffering here IN The City of Man.  Then when we are in The City of God, there will be no suffering. 
9 years 4 months ago
The two are not mutually exclusive.  We can have a national health care plan that is not neutral to abortion.


The latest from america

In cities across the country, local activists marched in support of a progressive agenda centered on economic justice, racial justice and immigrant rights.
Brandon SanchezJanuary 20, 2019
Screengrab from a viral video showcasing a confrontation between a Native American drummer and a group of Catholic high school students in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 18, 2019. Screenshot via YouTube.
Several clips of the encounter circulating on social media show a small group of Native American drummers, who were in Washington for the Indigenous People’s March, being surrounded by a much larger band of teenagers.
Pope Francis has suppressed the Ecclesia Dei Commission, a significant decision with consequences for the Holy See’s relations with the priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X.
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 19, 2019
Photo: IMDB
A new Netflix miniseries brings out the story’s aspects of adventure and conflict, with occasionally pulse-pounding results.
Rob Weinert-KendtJanuary 19, 2019