National Labor Relations Board seeks to reconcile religious freedom and labor rights

Adjunct instructors at St. Michael's

In a much-anticipated decision last week the National Labor Relations Board ruled on adjuncts’ right to organize at religious colleges and universities. Over the past few years adjunct instructors at several Catholic colleges and universities have filed for union representation elections. Georgetown, St. Michael’s, St. Mary’s and the University of St. Thomas have seen the elections proceed without incident. Others – such as Duquesne, Manhattan, St. Xavier, and Seattle – objected to the whole process, arguing that as religious institutions the First Amendment exempted them from the National Labor Relations Act. Regional NLRB offices retorted that the schools, which served students of all faiths and didn’t require religious instruction, were not sufficiently religious for the purpose of the law – creating an unfortunate echo of the Affordable Care Act contretemps over contraception at Catholic hospitals.

Religious schools (Catholic and otherwise) appealed the decision to the head NLRB office in Washington DC. In Pacific Lutheran the Board gave its answer, an attempt to reconcile the religious freedom of denominational universities without unjustly abridging the rights of their employees. The Board deliberately renounced authority to determine if a college or university had a “substantial religious character” and generally expressed considerable deference to any institution that “holds itself out” as a religious institution. But workers, including faculty, do not automatically forfeit all their rights when they accept employment at a religious institution: only if the University “holds out” publicly that the faculty perform a religious function in furtherance of the religious mission will they be ineligible for these protections. The Board stated:


We rely on the institution’s own statements about whether its teachers are obligated to perform a religious function, without questioning the institution’s good faith or otherwise second-guessing those statements. If the evidence shows that faculty members are required to serve a religious function, such as integrating the institution’s religious teachings into coursework, serving as religious advisors to students, propagating religious tenets, or engaging in religious indoctrination or religious training, we will decline jurisdiction. [Pacific Lutheran University and Service Employees International Union, Local 925, Petitioner. Case 19–RC–102521]

The long march of this litigation may not be over; either party may appeal the decision to the courts. However, the Board has made a considerable effort here to vindicate the just demands of both the universities and their adjunct faculty. Let us pray that the two sides use the opportunity to build employment relations premised on collaboration and mutual respect.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Ernest Martinson
3 years 9 months ago
I would go further than arguing the First Amendment exempts religious institutions from the National Labor Relations Act. I would offer that the constitutionality of the NLRA should be revisited. In attempting to equalize the bargaining power between employer and employee, the freedom of both employer and individual employees has been compromised. There are means to balance the bargaining power that empowers the worker rather than collectives such as unions and government. The role of government in the economy, environment, and equity needs to be radically debated.
David Smith
3 years 9 months ago
Indeed. That government should always have the final word in every dispute is not healthy in a culture that values - that proclaims - the freedom of the individual to stand apart from the crowd. This is especially true in a majoritarian democracy like ours, in which one crowd is effectively given the power to rule every four years.


The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018