Holocaust denial bishop fined as Vatican opens talks with SSPX

How's that for timing? On the day that the Vatican begins talks with the ultra-traditionalist Society of St Pius X, which split from Rome in 1988, a German court has fined one of the SSPX's bishops, Richard Williamson, for denying the Holocaust.

Bishop Williamson must pay 12,000 euros for asserting on Swedish television that fewer than 300,000 Jews died in Nazi death camps. Holocaust denial is classed as a hate crime in Germany. Because the interview took place in Regensburg, German prosecutors were allowed to investigate.


When, in January this year, Pope Benedict XVI revoked the 21-year excommunication of four bishops in the Swiss-based SSPX, scenes from the interview revealed Bishop Williamson to be a Holocaust denier. There was international uproar, leading to an unusual papal apology. 

The talks which began today are on a huge range of topics -- tradition, Paul VI Missal, ecumenism, religious freedom and so on -- and are expected to last a long time.The SSPX denies almost everything said by the Second Vatican Council.

But the process could be cut short by Pope Benedict offering the Society a personal prelature or similar, on the lines of what he has just held out to Anglican traditionalists.

Bishop Bernard Fellay, SSPX head, confirmed that this was what the Pope was thinking in an interview (in Spanish) with the Santiago de Chile daily El Mercurio. Asked to confirm that Rome was thinking of offering the SSPX a personal prelature, Fellay tells the newspaper that there is a "lot of truth" in the speculation, and that he believes "the Vatican is moving towards that canonical solution".

Even more worrying, Fellay thinks the Williamson interview furore was "a very well planned attack ... on the person of the Pope" and at no point in the interview actually distances himself from Willliamson's remarks, recorded on tape.

Which only makes me wonder why the Pope regards Fellay and his brother bishops as dialogue partners -- let alone worth bending backwards to accommodate.


Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
8 years 12 months ago
I am not sure what is more absurd;  Williamson's crazy opinion about the holocaust or Germany's crazy law against crazy opinions.
Joseph Farrell
8 years 12 months ago
We are engaging them because there are thousands of souls to be saved in that movement and that is the mission of the Church.  That is more important than the political expediency of distancing ourselves from dialogue with the group in order to avoid negative press.
It's the same reason we are engaging the Episcopal Church.
Christ did pray that all might be one. 
Ryan Haber
8 years 11 months ago
Actually, Joe, it's funny.  I am taking a cue from G. K. Chesteron's "What I Saw in America."
While a law against crazy opinions would be crazy in America, there is some sanity to such a thing in Germany, precisely because they have a history of insanity.  In the United States, we have a long tradition of rival opinions holding each other in check, and a government of checks and balances.  This tradition generally keeps us from going too far over the deep end for too long.  There have been exceptions, but they prove the rule.
Germany, a country I have visited twice and love very much, has a history of striving for national unity and of wrecklessly plunging into war over the quest to fulfill a national ideology of national unity - it fought three wars of increasing intensity against increasing numbers of opponents and caused increasing harm in the mere seventy years from 1870.  In such a context, laws aimed at defusing overblown nationalism are the best way to preserve the nation.  And in a land occasionally swept by overpowering ideological lies, the best remedy might be laws against speaking lies.
It is possible that given different national temperaments, different responses to national lunacies are perfectly in order.  There are some things that should not be outlawed in America, but perhaps should be elsewhere, and vice versa.  Anyhow, I do not think Germans crazy for attempting to stop crazies from spreading craziness.


The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018