Fathers, Put Down Your Phones!

I write as a dad to other dads: Put down your phones when you're with your children!

I know how hard it can be to resist the lure of the latest update emanating from your device, but is it just me, or are fathers given (or taking) much more cultural permission for ignoring their kids in favor of their phones than mothers?

Advertisement

Dads, you know who you are.

We are part of that cohort of fathers who are actively involved in our childrens' lives, who go to work late or leave early for kids' events, for whom sharing home duties and caring for our kids 50-50 with our wives, partners, or significant others is not only a no-brainer, it is a priority. We are the generation pushing for paternity leaves from work, who get up early from meetings (or simply miss them) because we need to take our children to play practice or soccer, we host playdates, accompany our kids to birthday parties, we talk parenting with other dads, we say we don't want work to define our lives and we talk with each other about what it feels like to go through different stages in our relationships with children and partners as we age.

There are by now a fair number of studies that confirm this deepening shift in (middle class) fathers' self-perceptions and practices. And perhaps the most memorable talk to faculty I have ever heard from an administrator was by our Provost at Fordham, Dr. Stephen Freedman, a few years ago, when at a faculty convocation he told a moving story about a parenting memory from when his children were younger as a way of talking about the relationship between our work and our larger lives. Let's celebrate all this -- and celebrate too our spouses and partners who take an equally active role in parenting, and with whom so many of us talk, negotiate, haggle, and fumble through from day to day in making family life sane and loving.

But dads, with all this being true, why is it that we seem to be the worst offenders about our mobile devices!

In middle class USA, go to any playground, playdate, kids' party, living room, restaurant, patio, automobile, subway, sporting event, kids' play, musical performance, or classroom event, and on and on, and we men are far more likely than women to be glued to our phones while the kids fend for themselves nearby. Am I moralizing if I say that I think we are lingering longer on these devices than we realize or admit? Am I judging harshly if I ask us to imagine what it's like for our children to so often look at their dads and see them staring into screens, especially when they think the kids aren't looking? Do we imagine what this generation of children will be saying about us twenty years from now?

I readily admit that the seduction of adult contact through the device can sometimes, in the moment, seem more of what we want than whatever is happening with the kids in front of us, but time that is "down," "open," "empty," or "blank" with children is not only an important part of the rhythm of parenting, it is the very experience we will likely have wanted more fully to inhabit when we slow down to review what is really important.

I, too, love my work and find the world of instant mobile connection somewhat intoxicating, and feel a great delight in staying in touch with friends so regularly in a way never before possible. But yesterday, I was sitting in a cafe and a boy about ten years old was eating his lunch while his father, across from him, was glued to his phone for a good 20 minutes with the occasional half-attempt at conversation with his son without eye contact. "Dad, come on," the boy asked, but the father had to get through a few more emails or check one more website. The pleading went on for many more minutes before the phone grudgingly went down. From what I have observed, far fewer mothers would think this is okay.

If you're a father and this does not apply to you, cheers for being present. If this does apply to you, I am just saying from one dad to another, take it or leave it: life is too short. Of course kids need their own healthy space and differentiation from us, and of course we need to use our devices sometimes to get something pressing done, but our children need us to be "around" even when we are not directly engaged with them. Because I have not been able to say this on the playground yet, I'm putting it on this blog.

Tom Beaudoin

New York City, USA

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Fran Rossi Szpylczyn
7 years 4 months ago
This is a really important post and for more than simply fathers. Thank you!
7 years 4 months ago
Great post.   Thank you for being a caring Dad, and for reminding other Dads to drop their phones and be reallly good fathers, especially to their daughters!  Happy, contented and emotionally stable wives and mothers had great caring, good listening, Dads!
Michael Curren
7 years 4 months ago
Guilty. I had an eye opener when having dinner at an informal dinner party this weekend of people most of whom do not own cell phones.....I received an instant message from a relative and was responding when the women next to me said " you realize that sort of thing is pretty dismissive of those of us at the table?". Of course it is....I guess I need to wake up and hang up! thanks.

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018