Election Day Tea Leaves

Tonight’s election results may not contain any tea leaves for the future. Off-year elections tend to favor the party that is out of power so it should be a good not for Republicans. But, it might also be the night the GOP, drawing the wrong lessons, heads over the cliff.

Only two governorships are up for grabs, Virginia and New Jersey, and the GOP should pick up both of them. In Virginia, in each of the last eight elections, the party that won the White House the previous year has lost the Governor’s race. Democrats have controlled the Governor’s Mansion in Richmond for the past eight years and have largely failed to bend a GOP-controlled legislature to the common effort. On top of that, the Democratic candidate Creigh Deeds, is by all accounts a decent man who has run a terrible campaign. His opponent Bob McDonnell, a Notre Dame graduate who criticized his alma mater for inviting President Obama, should win in double digits. The key thing to look for? Do the Democrats continue to control one of the houses of the state legislature because that body, along with the new Republican Governor, will be charged with redistricting after next year’s census.


In New Jersey, I am shocked that incumbent Gov. Jon Corzine is still making a race of it. When the economy is bad, it is never a good idea to be an incumbent. The only thing worse in the current political climate would be, I don’t know, being a former Wall Street banker. Corzine is both. New Jersey is a blue state, of course, so if the Democrats nominate the Tin Man he would start at 45 percent. A third party candidate makes the race competitive but look for Corzine to lose narrowly.

The most interesting race is in New York twenty-third congressional district. There, the candidate for the Conservative Party garnered so much money and attention that the GOP’s moderate candidate had to drop out last weekend: The New York Republican party, the party of Jacob Javits and Nelson Rockefeller, could not be more dead. This is a Republican district: Although it voted for Obama last year with 52 percent of the vote, it has been represented in Congress by a Republican for more than one hundred years. The internal fighting within the GOP is the only reason the Democrat has a shot. The Conservative candidate, Doug Hoffman, should win handily.

The key will be what lesson the GOP takes from its victory in NY-23. If they conclude that the way to win is to nominate only candidates who meet the standards of party orthodoxy set by their increasingly rabid base, watch for them next to go after Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, who is facing a primary challenge from a more conservative Marco Rubio. Republicans that back President Obama’s anticipated effort to enact immigration reform will be targeted. Any candidate who is concerned enough about the deficit to contemplate raising taxes can kiss their GOP future good-bye. &c.

Currently, 20 percent of the American electorate identifies itself as Republican. The populist rage against the bailouts and the health care bill is coming partly from conservative Republicans and also partly from Independent voters who backed Ross Perot. (How easy it is to forget that he garnered 19 percent of the vote in the 1992 presidential election.) These Independent voters are those most likely to be swayed by an economic turnaround that appears to be gaining steam. Combined, conservative Republicans and Independent Perotites may be able to dictate the outcome in an upstate New York, off-year congressional race, but it is difficult to see how they can bring back centrist voters nationwide who have been tilting left anyway. If Republicans think Doug Hoffman is their future, they are on a path towards further marginalization.


Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
9 years 2 months ago
     I grew up in a big city Catholic family.  We were Democrats and I was taught that Carter was one of the greatest presidents and Reagan was evil.
     I am no longer a Democrat.  I have voted for more Republicans than Democrats over the last 10 years BUT I am not a Republican.  I am Catholic.  I could care less about the Republican Party.
     The big shame is all of those Catholics who still care about the Democratic party more than their Catholic faith.
     The fact that Hoffman can beat a liberal Democrat and a Liberal Republican in a GENERAL election says less about the Republican party and more about the outrage in this nation.  The Democrats might want to spin this as the Republican Party becoming narrow but that would only apply if this was a primary election.
     I will not vote for a pro-abortion Republican any more than I would vote for a pro-abortion Democrat.  Unlike Mr. Winters, I won't back down.  Mr. Winters draws his line in the sand and lets the winds blow it away.  I desire to etch my line in stone.
Brian Thompson
9 years 2 months ago
I am not old enough to share Joe's experiences, but I do share his sentiments to a degree.
Evil is evil no matter who is for it. I am unapologetically Catholic, and when or if I find myself deviating from that self-conception, I seek to correct it.
Oh, what I would give for a politician who wanted to promote social justice, and political subsidiarity, and doesn't like to kill babies and the sick. I could even swallow differences on how we think societal goals might be accomplished, if only I didn't have to choose Judas since "at least he isn't Satan!"
Am I making any sense?
Gabriel Marcella
9 years 2 months ago
Joe and Brian:
Your messages resonate powerfully with many Catholics. I grew up in a family that worshiped FDR and fully supported the Democratic party. That party is long gone. The Democratic party no longer represents Catholics who defend life. No, I do not automatically vote Republican. Mr. Winters misses the point that there is vast middle ground in American politics that yearns for leaders who "promote social justice, and political subsidiarity, and doesn't like to kill babies and the sick." Until we get leaders of such moral fortitude you will have people who will draw "the line in the sand and let the wind blow it away." No, I will not vote for candidates who support abortion.
James Lindsay
9 years 2 months ago
Michael, looks like you got two out of three. The defeat of Mr. Hoffman in NY-23 shows that the public more and more considers any politicians views on Roe v. Wade to be irrelevant. Until a reasoned and viable bill in the US Congress is introduced to change the status of the unborn, the pro-life movement as currently constituted will become more an more irrelevant (as will be the Bishop's support of it at election time).


The latest from america

An extraordinary minister of the holy Eucharist distributes Communion during Mass at Transfiguration Church in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn, N.Y. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
According to a report released by the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate at Georgetown University on Jan. 22, just 33 percent of bishops in the United States think the church “should” ordain women as deacons.
Michael J. O’LoughlinJanuary 22, 2019

When the poet Mary Oliver died last week at the age of 83, my social media feeds blossomed into a field of tributes.

Lisa AmplemanJanuary 22, 2019
Most of the undocumented immigrants who are in the United States have overstayed a visa and did not cross the border illegally, according to a new analysis from the Center of Migration Studies.
J.D. Long-GarcíaJanuary 22, 2019
The church is my home because my home was a domestic church.
Katie Prejean McGradyJanuary 22, 2019