Does serenity have a prayer?

Mulling over the Senate’s health care reform vote this morning and wondering if I would truly be forced to reject a social reform I have spent my entire adult life supporting, I found some consolation and common good sense this morning e-thumbing via iPhone through the New York Times opinion section. In it this morning you’ll find a measured and rational defense of his House amendment extending the existing social contract of the Hyde Amendment from Bart Stupak (“What my amendment won’t do”) and another exercise in rational over wishful thinking from Thomas Friedman in a good-humored call for the application of the precautionary principle to climate change. Friedman so succinctly captures the virtues of that argument for intervention in the face of purloined-email-enhanced climate change skepticism his piece should be laminated and attached to foreheads throughout Denmark, or at least turned into a talking points memo somewhere (“Going Cheney on Climate”). I also found a column I’d missed a few days ago: Cardinal Mahony neatly capturing all the common goods that pertain to a generous and wise extension of health care reform to include undocumented immigrants and their access to unsubsidized coverage for preventive care (“Coverage without borders”). Sadly this compelling argument is apparently not even part of the discussion in the reform debate this week.

Amidst the wise opinioning, I found something else, too. A while back the Times had covered the story of the confirmation of the authorship of the so-called serenity prayer, put to work most often these days among folks battling addiction. Most now accept that the prayer was actually authored or at least codified by Reinhold Niebuhr and today’s Times included a letter from Niebuhr biographer Richard Fox, who wrote:

Advertisement

Putting the spotlight on Niebuhr’s authorship (whether he was the sole “originator” of the prayer or the major “codifier” of fragments already floating in the homiletic air) may help redirect attention toward the social Gospel meaning the prayer conveyed to Niebuhr and his many liberal disciples — even after their radical hopes of the early 1930s had dimmed.

They were still seeking, in an era of lowered expectations for new political departures, the “courage to change” unjust social conditions as well as individual hearts.

It’s an interesting notion to return what has become something of a cliche of the era of personal affirmation, the serenity prayer—“God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; courage to change the things I can; and wisdom to know the difference”—to its apparent original purpose as a small consoling mantra for people engaged in the frustrating task of social change, particularly in the face of the terrible paradox of the health-care reform hijacking happening before our eyes this week. It’s not a bad reminder for many of us who are tempted to surrender to despair in the face of such contradictions and the wearing difficulties of other struggles to protect or extend human dignity and affirm the spiritual and practical worth of the common good. I don’t see it as a white-flag muttering before forces larger than ourselves, but a daily opening to a step back, a restorative breath, and a small reminder that we are in this for the long haul. Defeat or victory will not be measured out by weekly congressional tallies.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Rick Malloy
8 years 10 months ago
Somewhere, can't remember where, I came across an extended version of the Serenity prayer.  Regardless of authorship, it's a great way to pray.  I keep a copy next to the evening "Magnificat" in my breviary.
**************************************************
Oh, God, grant me the Courage to change the things I can,
The Serenity to accept the things I cannot,
and the Wisdom to know the difference.
Living one day at a time, enjoying one moment at a time.
Accepting hardship as the way to peace.
Taking, as He did, this sinful world as it is, not as I would have it.
Trusting that He will make all things right, if I surrender to his will.
That I may be reasonably happy in this life and
Supremely happy with Him forever in the next.  Amen
                                                  Reinhold Niebuhr
8 years 10 months ago
I am also seriously distraught by the events in the senate; however, federal funding and subsidizing of abortion is NOT something we Catholics and other people of good will can accept.
 
I am not sure that this is what you are implying - but we can never accept evil as something we cannot challange or change.
 
This is no time for compliance - it will soon be a time for civil disobedience.

Advertisement

The latest from america

Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018
Kevin Clarke tells us about his reporting from Iraq.
Olga SeguraOctober 19, 2018