Church v Berlusconi (III): a revived Christian Democracy?

There is serious talk of forming a new centre-right Catholic party in the wake of the clash between the Church and the philandering Italian premier, Silvio Berlusconi, according to this interesting report by the Times in London.

At the centre of the attempt to create a new Christian Democrat bloc is Europe's leading Catholic politician, Rocco Buttiglione, who heads the -- currently tiny -- Christian Democratic Union (UDC). Buttiglione, who was Pope John Paul II's favourite politician, says an October conference in Sicily will discuss a "new centrist political force" aimed at reviving the alliance which dominated Italian politics for 50 years after World War II.

Advertisement

The Christian Democrats imploded in the early 1990s amidst a series of corruption scandals. Berlusconi stole the torch, portraying himself as the successor of Luigi Sturzo, the priest who founded Italy's first Christian Democrat party, the Partito Popolare, in the 1920s. 

But he never looked very convincing as a Christian Democrat. The authoritarian populist has always had more in common with Benito Mussolini -- the dictator who crushed the Partito Popolare -- than with Fr Sturzo.

Catholics seem to be waking up to this. The trigger for Buttiglione's new alliance is the fast declining support among Catholics for Berlusconi, who until recently has been successful in portraying himself as the Catholic candidate. But clashes with the Church over the mogul's lurid not-so-private life, his draconian immigration laws and the smearing of a Catholic editor by the Berlusconi press -- see previous post -- have led to the chilliest relations between Church and State in years.

Let's not overstate this. Italian politicians regularly rearrange the furniture, creating new parties and new alliances. Approval for Berlusconi among the 40 per cent of Italians who are churchgoing Catholics remains relatively strong at 50 per cent. And the UDC managed only 6 per cent at the last election.

But something new is stirring, and the significance of this embryonic realignment of Church and politics in Italy is greater than its immediate and local consequence, for it suggests that Catholic public opinion cannot be long seduced by a narrative of the right. Like conservatives everywhere -- beginning with Bush - -Berlusconi believed he could snag the Catholic vote by identifying with the Church on abortion and stem-cell research, or "family values". 

But the Church also believes in life outside the womb -- in treating migrants as human beings, for example -- and in freedom of speech and press. The Catholic vote isn't as cheaply bought as some right-wing politicians seem to think.

What makes a future Buttiglione-led revived UDC even more interesting is that the senator has publicly said he no longer supports criminalising abortion (see my previous post). He remains passionately pro-life, and is busy creating an international coalition to help make abortion rarer. But he accepts the impossibility of preventing abortion by the power of the state.

So here's the point. If no right-wing politician in the West is willing to criminalise abortion -- Bush didn't, Berlusconi hasn't -- then the pro-life "trump card" played so well by Karl Rove under Bush can no longer be deployed. That means, surely, a greater chance of the Catholic vote steering towards the political stance which most identifies with Catholic social teaching in its integrity -- by which I mean reducing abortion but not by criminalising it, as well as, obviously, an attempt to curb the excesses of the market, particularly as they impact on the vulnerable; and, overall, aiming at a politics of the common good modified by the option for the poor. 

Maybe Rome's out ahead on this? Maybe that's why it seems more open to Obama than many of the US bishops, and more opposed to Berlusconi than many Catholics in Italy. (Maybe.)

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
8 years 10 months ago
This is a horrible misreading of what is happening in Italy.Ask anybody who lives in Italy apart from an English journalist and they will tell you that nothing is really shaking.Those in the new party are to all intents and purposes Berlusconis friends.The Church also knows that its power resides with the minority and not the majority.They must play their percentage and not overdo it.This is certainly not good news for the left as any move they make will be checkered by the Church and so what we will get ,if anything ,is a new alignment with a further move to centralism in Italy .There is certainly no real change a happenin.Can you imagine if Ralph Nader said that he would be backing either of the candidates for the next election it would not carry heavy weight.Such is Italy.   
8 years 10 months ago
''But the Church also believes in life outside the womb - in treating
migrants as human beings, for example - and in freedom of speech and
press. The Catholic vote isn't as cheaply bought as some right-wing
politicians seem to think.'' - Austen, that's an excellent point in a very interesting post.
8 years 10 months ago
But neither should they be bought by cheap slogans on the left about health care, migration, etc.  Until it's possible to align both things in a way that truly respects the depth and development of teaching a "Catholic" party risks confusing politics and faith.
8 years 10 months ago
So Buttiglione is now the Vatican's man because ''he accepts the impossibility of preventing abortion by the power of the state,'' a position he shares with President Obama, Planned Parenthood, NARAL . . . and now America magazine as well? Except for Karl Rove and his band of zany right-wingers, that's just about everybody, isn't it? Time to forget abortion and move on to important issues like immigration, I suppose.

Too bad Pope Benedict didn't read this analysis before he wasted all that energy in Caritas in Veritate trying to convince us of an alleged ''link between life ethics and social ethics.''
8 years 10 months ago

Buttiglione's resistence to making abortion illegal was exagerrated in the original interview, as his subsequent interview with C-FAM makes clear.  He has argued for a greater emphasis on measures outside of the penal code, but still believes in legal protection for unborn life.  See the interview here:  http://www.c-fam.org/publications/id.1328/pub_detail.asp]http://www.c-fam.org/publications/id.1328/pub_detail.asp].  I feel like there has been a lot of spin by Catholics who dislike the right and don't want abortion to be talked about in political terms because it makes their preferred candidates (like Teddy Kennedy) look bad.  The language of "criminalizing abortion" is also taken from the left, which wants to conjur up the image of pregnant women being dragged from clinics to prisons, when, of course, legal protection for the unborn could be undertaken without criminal penalties.  Some clarification of what Mr. Buttiglione did (and didn't) say might be appropriate.

Perhaps being English, Mr Invereigh is unfamiliar with the U.S. constitution, which actually gives the President very little authority to unilaterally overturn Supreme Court decisions. Of course, the difficulty of overturning Roe and Casey is exacerbated by Democrats' nominees for the court and obstruction of justices who would overturn Roe and Casey.

Advertisement

The latest from america

A woman who told police that she and her family were from Sudan is taken into custody by a Royal Canadian Mounted Police officer after arriving in February 2017 by taxi and walking across the U.S.-Canada border into Quebec. (CNS photo/Christinne Muschi, Reuters)
Canada is not innocent when it comes to immigration policies that have the potential to hurt individuals and divide families.
Dean DettloffJuly 13, 2018
In this June 6, 2018, photo, President Donald Trump's Chief of Staff John Kelly attends a briefing on this year's hurricane season at the Federal Emergency Management Agency Headquarters in Washington. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
The private letter, sent more than a year ago, may have had changed Mr. Kelly’s mind for a time.
J.D. Long-GarcíaJuly 13, 2018
May the best team win. Actually, may Croatia win, argues Travis Timmons.
Travis Timmons July 13, 2018
Stretching voter regulation powers to the limit is contrary to the spirit of a democracy.
The EditorsJuly 13, 2018