Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Michael J. O’LoughlinJanuary 16, 2013

At an event in Washington last night reexamining the race for the White House and looking forward to the next four years hosted by NPR, Chicago Tribune columnist Clarence Page discussed the fractured cultural climate in which we find ourselves, citing the hyper-partisan programming on both Fox News and MSNBC as drivers of this new reality. He noted the truism that in the 1950s, each family had access to three networks, a couple of newspapers, and that as a result, there was a common culture that united most people and, at the very least, facts were facts.

Today, he said, we choose what we want to watch, which facts we want to believe, who we want to live around, where we want to socialize, and as a result, that we are “re-tribalizing” in a way that we haven’t faced since the height of immigration in the late 19th Century. (He contrasted this with the current efforts of Hispanics and African-Americans to assimilate into a dominant culture that is quickly segmenting itself away).

Page’s comments compelled me to think about where the Catholic Church in the US finds itself today. By nearly all accounts, we’re a divided church. We fight over our politics, the ways we worship, the dress our priests choose, the music we sing, who can serve in which roles, and various other issues that divide our communities.

As Catholics try to heal these divisions, I wonder, how will these external forces impact the efforts? That is, is the church immune to these powerful societal changes, or is it shaped by them? Or, is there another choice?

I remember as a child hearing about the Irish parish and the Italian parish and the Polish parish and so on, and while they were all Catholic, one did not cross ethnic divides. So in a way, the church in America was once incredibly divided, as our forebears brought their geographic prejudices from one shore to another. Vatican II, many hoped, would usher in an age of Christian unity. Perhaps it did, for a few decades, but today we find ourselves today again besieged by discord. Continually I wonder, why is this?

Perhaps the Trib columnist is on to something about our culture, something that applies to our church as well. The staggering amount of choice and customization we encounter in daily life allows us to construct a reality that can be quite different from the realities of our neighbors. And when that combines with the ability to surround ourselves, whether virtually or in reality, with others who think and believe just as we do, we form our own tribes that, naturally, view the others with contempt and suspicion.

Has this spilled into the church? 

I suspect it has, and, if left unabated, will continue to corrode our community. But rather than lament this reality, imagine a church that was able to come together, move past the divisiveness, and work together to help usher in even just a piece of God’s reign. Our divisions run deep, and because we are so often concerned with the ultimate things in life, they stir up powerful emotions. But imagine if the church were able to work through this together. Imagine the lessons we might offer the wider culture. We could lead by example. A key to this will be forgiveness, on both sides, but if Catholic Christians can’t achieve this, what hope is there for society as a whole?

Michael J. O'Loughlin

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Jeanne Linconnue
10 years 2 months ago
"....we form our own tribes that, naturally, view the others with contempt and suspicion. Has this spilled into the church? "Yes, of course it has".... if left unabated, will continue to corrode our community....., imagine a church that was able to come together, move past the divisiveness, and work together ...."Right now I cannot imagine this happening, especially if the next pope views the church in the same way as the current pope and his predecessor. Since the main criteria for becoming a bishop or cardinal during the last 34 years was to mirror the thoughts and beliefs of the pope, it is unlikely that the next conclave will change course and elect someone who might more think a bit more like John XXIII than Benedict and John Paul II. And so the divisiveness and corrosion will continue.
John Barbieri
10 years 2 months ago
Sadly, I think that you're correct about this unhappy state of affairs. One thing all of us could do though is to try to stay civil and even to be gentle with each other.
Jim McCrea
10 years 2 months ago
Unfortunately, Jeanne, you appear to be correct. The unelected episcopacy and electorate for the papacy are like the SCOTUS ... powers unto themselves. The only exception would be a bishop who actually thinks and speaks for himself and doesn't parrott what the Roman talking papers expect him to say and think. He'll be history before his latest meal settles in.
John Swanson
10 years 2 months ago
"imagine a church that was able to come together, move past the divisiveness, and work together to help usher in even just a piece of God’s reign." I would like to imagine this. However, your article doesn't mention at all the issue of power. When one view has all the power, and doesn't even want the other side to be able to talk about some of the important issues, then I lose my ability to imagine
Dan Hannula
10 years 2 months ago
Amen! The institutional church had an easy time when we were the Polish, French, or Irish parish. Immigrant groups needed a forum for community and the church was happy to be that for American Catholics; in some cases fortifying those divisions. Now, it is anything but a forum for community; unless, of course, your view of community is like that of Downton Abbey, another moribund fictional society. Our Bishops are much like Lord Grantham forbidding his daughter from marrying the chauffeur--how funny was that!
James Murrray
10 years 2 months ago
The trouble with tribes is that the common thinking patterns reinforce themselves into confidence and extremism. That's why Church leadership needs diversity and that alone is a reason to admit women to positions of power. Also, it is a good reason to avoid intellectual inbreeding that unfortunately is needed to advance in the hierarchy.
Mary Sweeney
10 years 2 months ago
Divisions are real. Jesus in fact did talk about them. "I came not to bring peace, but the sword." Not all things can be reconciled. Good and evil cannot be reconciled. Good must triumph over evil. The best thing that I have ever read on this subject is quite old but it has helped me many times over the past 25 years. I share it with you. It is written by someone who has walked the walk. http://www.whas11.com/news/local/Program-note-for-President-Obama-ina-187473191.html

The latest from america

a hand holds a smartphone displaying a new york times article about covid-19
In a time when we felt isolated, afraid and increasingly divided, The Times gave us a means to better understand what was happening and to stay connected with one another.
Jim McDermottMarch 27, 2023
A family sits around a table eating a meal
Imprisoned Nicaraguan Bishop Rolando Álvarez appeared unexpectedly on Nicaraguan television March 24, more than six weeks after refusing to be exiled from his country, opting instead to face his sentence of 26 years behind bars. 
Woman walks along a bridge surrounded by trees
A Reflection for Monday of the Fifth Week of Lent, by Cecilia González-Andrieu
A man and woman sit close together and share an intimate moment in a play rehearsal .
“Love,” a new play by Alexander Zeldin, is not a grim report on poverty nor a blistering call for social reform, but simply lets the poor speak their own stories.
Rhoda FengMarch 27, 2023