Father James Martin: Why I Am Pro-Life

  A woman holds a child in 2016 at a maternity home in Riverside, N.J., one of six pro-life maternity homes in the Good Counsel network. The Riverside facility houses about a dozen expectant mothers, provides a safe environment for the women to continue their pregnancy, and offers continuing education, job training and material support. (CNS photo/Jeffrey Bruno)

Whenever I say that I am pro-life, it always surprises some people—which always surprises me.

Last summer I attended a conference on polarization in the Catholic Church, held at Georgetown University. One evening, when I mentioned my pro-life convictions to a participant, her face registered shock. “I’m so relieved to hear that,” she said.


Maybe because I also advocate for refugees and migrants, L.G.B.T. people and the environment—causes usually championed by those who identify as politically progressive—some people tell me that they wonder about the sincerity of my public comments in support of unborn children. By the same token, others with whom I share common ground on a variety of social justice issues often express discomfort, disappointment and even anger when I use the phrase “pro-life.”

So perhaps it would be helpful to explain what I mean when I say that I am pro-life. And I would invite you to consider this more as a profession of faith than as a political argument.

The best way of explaining my belief is this: The longer I live, the more I grow in awe of God’s creative activity and in reverence for God’s creation.

I see God’s creative activity in countless ways, but mainly in the ways that God is active in the spiritual lives of people with whom I minister. Over the last 25 years, I have accompanied perhaps hundreds of people in my ministry as a spiritual director—that is, someone who helps people notice God in their daily lives and in their prayer.

In the process I have seen first-hand how God encounters individuals in breathtakingly, sometimes nearly miraculously personal ways. With one person, God encounters him or her through a powerful experience in private prayer, with another during an almost mystical experience amid nature, with another in a conversation that suddenly heals an old emotional wound. The expression “God meets people where they are” captures some of this reality—but only a little. God’s ability to enter a person’s life in ways that are perfectly tailored to that life always amazes me.

The more I see this, the more my awe of God’s creative activity naturally grows.

But I notice God’s creative activity in other ways, too. The birth of my two nephews, who are now 20 and 13 years old, profoundly deepened my appreciation for the mystery of life. When I first saw my oldest nephew in the hospital a few hours after his birth, I was tremendously moved. After returning home, I wept for joy, completely overwhelmed by the gift and vulnerability of God’s new creation. Over the years I’ve watched them learn how to eat, sit up, talk, crawl, laugh, walk, read, run, ride bikes, make jokes, throw a ball, drive a car and take joy in the world.

The longer I live, the more I grow in awe of God’s creative activity and in reverence for God’s creation.

Recently I had dinner with my older nephew and thought, “I can’t believe that he didn’t exist 20 years ago” and felt a surge of gratitude for God’s grace. (I knew enough not to tell him this, since he’d probably say, “Uncle Jim, give me a break!” Or more likely, “Uh huh.”)

The more I reflect on this the more my reverence for God’s creation grows. All of this naturally increases my reverence for the life of the child in the womb.

Now, as a man and a priest, and therefore someone who will never experience the joys and challenges of being a mother, someone who will never have to make a decision about an abortion and someone in a position of some power in the church, I recognize the limitations of my experience. And I recognize that many women consider it offensive to hear this from a man—because they have told me.

Many women whom I love, respect and admire support abortion rights and see these rights as a constitutive part of their authority over their own bodies. And who can doubt that over the centuries, women have been dominated and abused by men—even men responsible for providing them with legal, pastoral and medical care?

I cannot deny that I see the child in the womb, from the moment of his or her conception, as a creation of God, deserving of our respect, protection and love.

But acknowledging that women’s bodies are their own does not diminish my own reverence for the living body in a woman’s womb. Thus, I cannot deny that I see the child in the womb, from the moment of his or her conception, as a creation of God, deserving of our respect, protection and love. Mysterious, precious, unique, infinite, made in the image and likeness of God. Holy.

And my respect for life extends to life at every stage, a feeling that has only grown though my experiences in various ministries during my 30 years as a Jesuit—for example, with refugees.

For two years, as a young Jesuit in the early 1990s, I worked in Kenya with refugees from around East Africa, who, in search of a safe life for their families, had fled war-torn countries like Sudan, Ethiopia, Uganda, Somalia and Rwanda, and settled in the slums of Nairobi. There, along with colleagues from the Jesuit Refugee Service, I helped them start small businesses to support themselves.

Many of them had suffered the severest losses in their home countries, tragedies that might seem unbelievable to some—seeing spouses hacked to death with machetes before them; watching their children have their throats slit; and being brutalized, kidnapped and tortured themselves. Sometimes people think I am concocting these stories. I’m not. I have met these people, and in many cases have seen the proof: medical records, newspaper clippings, gruesome scars.

When I think of “life issues” I often think of the 68 million refugees, migrants and internally displaced people whose most important “pro-life activity” is to flee.

Their lives were devalued, threatened and imperiled. It’s no wonder that refugees and migrants flee their home countries. Nearly all of them flee to save their lives and protect the lives of their children. So when I think of “life issues” I often think of the 68 million refugees, migrants and internally displaced people whose most important “pro-life activity” is to flee. Their lives are often at risk not just in their home countries, but also in transit through the deserts and on the seas, and later in teeming refugee camps, where, despite many noble efforts, they and their children die due to lack of food, sanitation and medicine.

Every life is precious to God—including the lives of refugees, migrants and internally displaced persons. In other words, the life of a child at a border is precious, just as the life of a child in the womb is precious.

To take another non-traditional “life issue,” think about L.G.B.T. people. In the past few years I have learned a great deal about how these precious lives are also in grave danger. Consider this: lesbian, gay and bisexual youth in the United States are almost five times as likely to commit suicide than their straight counterparts. In many countries around the world, a gay person is at serious risk of being beaten or killed if his or her sexuality is discovered, and in eight countries homosexual acts are punishable with the death penalty. And in the last 10 years, over 3,000 transgender people have been murdered worldwide, and the most common causes of their deaths are shootings, stabbings and beatings.

In some places, then, L.G.B.T. issues are truly life issues. The life of an L.G.B.T. teenager in a family that rejects them is precious, just as the life of a child in the womb is precious.

The life of an L.G.B.T. teenager in a family that rejects them is precious, just as the life of a child in the womb is precious.

I could also tell you about many other vulnerable lives that I have encountered as a Jesuit, which are equally valuable in the eyes of God: the lives of patients with traumatic brain injuries confined for years in a hospital in Cambridge, Mass.; the lives of the poor, sick and dying men and women in their final days at Mother Teresa’s hospice in Kingston, Jamaica; the lives of street-gang members in the violent, deadly and now-demolished housing projects in Chicago; the lives of men who have attempted suicide and who now sit in solitary confinement in a prison in Boston. All these people are God’s beloved children, made in God’s own image.

So my respect for life extends to all people, but most especially those whose lives are at risk: the unborn child, to be sure, but also the refugee whose life is threatened by war, the L.G.B.T. young person tempted to commit suicide, the homeless person whose life is endangered by malnutrition, the uninsured sick person with no health care, the elderly person in danger of being euthanized. I have come to value all life, from conception to natural death, and believe that our laws should reflect this important principle.

Sometimes this is referred to as the “consistent ethic of life” or the “seamless garment” approach, a reference to the robe stripped from Jesus before his crucifixion and for which soldiers cast lots (Jn 19:23-24). It has been criticized unfairly by some people as “watering down” pro-life activities. One strong advocate of that approach, Cardinal Joseph Bernardin, the late archbishop of Chicago, lamented it was wrongly used in that way. But the misuse of a principle does not invalidate it.

The misuse of a principle does not invalidate it.

In fact, the point of the consistent ethic of life is not that we should focus on other issues instead of abortion, but that our witness for social justice and in defense of all life is strengthened when we base it clearly and consistently on the recognition of the dignity of every human life at every stage.

No less a person than St. John Paul II, in his encyclical “The Gospel of Life” (“Evangelium Vitae”), pointed to several “life issues” beyond abortion, invoking the Didache, one of the most ancient Christian texts outside the Bible, which dates to the first century. The Didache (which means “teaching” in Greek) not only inveighed against abortion but also condemned those who “show no compassion for the poor” and who “do not suffer with the suffering.”

In his encyclical, John Paul highlighted not only “the ancient threats of scourges of poverty, hunger, endemic disease, violence and war but also “new threats.” “Evangelium Vitae” joined with the Second Vatican Council in “forcefully condemning” practices that are “opposed to life itself.”

The long list often surprises people, but it is a reminder of the breadth of human life and the many threats to it.

…any type of murder, genocide, abortion, euthanasia, or willful self-destruction, whatever violates the integrity of the human person, such as mutilation, torments inflicted on body or mind, attempts to coerce the will itself; whatever insults human dignity, such as subhuman living conditions, arbitrary imprisonment, deportation, slavery, prostitution, the selling of women and children; as well as disgraceful working conditions, where people are treated as mere instruments of gain rather than as free and responsible persons; all these things and others like them are infamies indeed.

Today we could add even more to St. John Paul’s list. The threats to human life in all its diversity grow with each passing year.

The threats to human life in all its diversity grow with each passing year.

Perhaps it is time to expand our understanding of what it means to be pro-life. During the Georgetown University conference, I met many thoughtful people who proposed other ways of framing the discussion: “Whole Life,” “One Life,” “Every Life.” These may be some helpful ways forward.

What would help even more than a new label is for all of us to care for every life. For the refugee advocate to care passionately about the unborn. And for the pro-life marcher to care passionately about the migrant. We should care for all life.

Because, as our faith teaches, as I have learned, and as I believe, every life is sacred.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Chris Floersch
10 months 3 weeks ago

Sure – acknowledged – all life has merit – including those who’ve chosen the LGBT lifestyle! As we welcome this obligation from Fr. Martin - let’s also inform him of his – that he needs to inform Adam he got it all wrong where according to Moses he said “This one, at last, is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh… for out of man this one has been taken.” (you see an inherent givetake - or – issuereceive in the word ‘taken’). That does not exist in LGBT …

In case of man/woman marriage, JP II says there is a “mutual enrichment”, or “special reciprocity” – ref. Theology of the Body. This n a t u r a l l y leads to participation in God’s greatest gift of progeneration, and one of the deepest joys one can know.

God’s Word to man is pro-scriptive – but too often that’s seen as an overwhelming burden and excessive limitation. In truth it’s liberating! Because God’s left the rest up to man… meaning – the ‘rest’ is an overabundant opportunity at life… “Choose life, then, that you and your descendants may live…” (Dt 30:19) (‘descendants’… fascinating word in context of this discussion… something there to ponder…)


James Carney
10 months 3 weeks ago

None of this discussion addresses the terrible issue of the rape victim, especially a child rape victim, not to mention the added horror of incest. Why should this innocent victim be required to bear a child conceived totally without consent on her part, especially if the abortion is performed at an early stage, preferably within the first two weeks? A human life may be precious but unborn lives are not so precious that all other vital interests must be sacrificed to them.

Further, miscarriages occur in 10-15% or more of all pregnancies so it is clear that God has not structured human beings in a way to preserve every unborn life. This does not mean that abortion is not an evil but it is also sometimes a remedy for other evils (rape). Balancing of these interests is not wrong, in my opinion.

Finally, the Church's prohibition on artificial birth control is the biggest villain here. The Church, in fact, refuses even to formally declare that abortion is a worse sin than artificial birth control even though effective birth control prevents countless abortions. And despite Christ's direct guidance that sin occurs in the heart (so that adultery or even murder does not require the actual act), the Church tolerates natural family planning despite the fact that it is birth control of intention. This policy elevates the act of sex to a level above the love and joyful union that God intended for this act. Allowing artificial birth control with the proviso that all are called to bear as many children (and thereby share God's providence) as their circumstances reasonably permit would be a far more sensible and spiritually appropriate policy.

Barry Sullivan
10 months 3 weeks ago

Beautifully stated! If only we all could remember the importance of maintaining the "consistent ethic of life," as you have shared with us. I confess that I sometimes will put much greater emphasis on one or a few aspects that you have noted, but your remarks inspire me to become truly more consistent! Thank you and may God bless you in your important ministry!

Rockhurst Jesuits
10 months 3 weeks ago

I suggest that Fr. Martin is right in drawing our attention to the need to show respect for life at all sages of development, no less than our bishops of the USCCB have emphasized for us. Or to put it in the words of James 2:10: "For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become accountable for all of it." John Zupez, SJ

Bev Ceccanti
10 months 3 weeks ago

Rockhurst Jesuits: Fr. Martin expressed admiration and respect for women who are 'pro choice' advocates in this so called 'pro-life' article. Try inserting this expression of admiration into the' Holocaust' analogy Pope Francis used to describe this popular birth control method.'

Crystal Watson
10 months 3 weeks ago

If anyone's interested in a Christian pro-choice view, here's an article in the NYT about Dr. Willie Parker ... Meet Dr. Willie Parker, a Southern Christian Abortion Provider by Nicholas Kristof

Bev Ceccanti
10 months 3 weeks ago

What isn't Catholic is not Christian, No serious Catholic would give credence to a heretical 'opinion',

James Carney
10 months 3 weeks ago

This is an astonishingly ignorant assertion. Anyone who believes Jesus Christ is the Son of God and otherwise tries to follow his teachings is entitled to be called "Christian." For a more restrictive definition, but still not as broad as your assertion, anyone who accepts the Nicene Creed is a Christian. I know many Catholics who know very little about their faith and its teachings and I know several Protestants who understand the teachings of Christ extremely well. Your comment throws out the entire body of work of C.S. Lewis, one of the most insightful of Christian commentators.

Bev Ceccanti
10 months 3 weeks ago

All persons who are baptized are Christian. There is no 'innovation' in Revelation, which has been preserved and handed down throughout the ages by the Successors of the Apostles. Any practice or belief inconsistent with that Body of Revelation (Divine Revelation), as expressed through those given that Authority by Jesus Christ, ie those successors (bishops) and the Pope, under limited and special circumstances , can't be rightfully called 'Christian. Additionally, the four descriptors in the Nicene Creed can,t be applied to any other . ONE-we are joined as one in the Eucharist throughout the entire world. HOLY-because Jesus started the Catholic Church. CATHOLIC-The Church is 'universal' , (the Greek meaning of the word Catholic) It is the same throughout the world and is under one Pope. APOSTOLIC- The first pope was Peter and all written history supports the declaration the Bishops are Apostolic Successors,........... This is true regardless of the lack of knowledge on the part of many of the Baptized, including Catholics. Knowledge is not a requirement of being Christian. Infants become Christian at Baptism. Those baptized in other Christian 'Communities' are actually baptized in the Catholic Church. There is only one Church and the Sacrament of Baptism isn't done more than once. A baptized Protestant won't be re-baptized if he 'formally' joins the Catholic Church.

Bev Ceccanti
10 months 3 weeks ago

CS Lewis was a 'commentator' all the same. He was not and never claimed to be a Successor of the Apostles., however revered as a 'commentator he may have been.....and still is.

James Haraldson
10 months 2 weeks ago

"The longer I live, the more I grow in awe of God’s creative activity and in reverence for God’s creation." Which is precisely what you fail to do every time you get involved in promoting illicit sex.

James Haraldson
10 months 2 weeks ago

"The longer I live, the more I grow in awe of God’s creative activity and in reverence for God’s creation." Which is precisely what you fail to do whenever you promote illicit sex.


The latest from america

Theater critic Jose Solís surveys several productions of the holiday classic
Jose SolísDecember 06, 2019
Adrienne Warren and the cast of “Tina” (photo: Manuel Harlan)
The fall season has given us three wildly different case studies in Broadway’s pop/rock hybrids.
Rob Weinert-KendtDecember 06, 2019
The story of Catholics and the AIDS epidemic in the United States is often told as one of “gays versus the church.” But the reality was much more complicated.
JesuiticalDecember 06, 2019
Join us as we offer daily scripture reflections for the entire Advent season.
Elizabeth Kirkland CahillDecember 06, 2019