Loading...
Loading...
Click here if you don’t see subscription options
Kevin ClarkeMarch 11, 2013

Kristen Day, the executive director of Democrats for Life of America, offers some unsolicited advice in the Daily News to N.Y. Governor Andrew Cuomo as he seeks to extend some of the most permissive abortion laws in the nation:

In his second State of the State address, in 2012, Gov. Cuomo said that one of the most important things he had learned in his first year as governor is that every interest group has a lobbyist. But it wasn’t until last Wednesday that he heard from the lobbyists for preemies.

That’s when a group of New York physicians went to Albany to tell the governor, who is weighing legislation that would expand abortion rights, that preemies are often viable after just 24 weeks of pregnancy. Therefore, they said, at 24 weeks, if a mother’s health is at risk, doctors can and should deliver her baby instead of aborting it.

For abortion rights activists, the doctors’ message is an inconvenient truth, badly timed. New York already has nearly double the national per capita abortion rate, not to mention the highest teen abortion rate in the nation. Not coincidentally, New York also has fewer abortion restrictions than most every other state.

But that’s not permissive enough for abortion rights activists. They want to change the fact that, under current state law, abortion after 24 weeks is only allowed for women whose lives are in danger. Cuomo has proposed legislative changes that are expected to officially green-light abortions past 24 weeks — potentially through a woman’s due date — if her physical, emotional or psychological health are threatened.

Read the rest here.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Marie Rehbein
12 years 1 month ago
Most women who have abortions after 24 weeks are having them because they have learned that their fetus has some defect that would prevent its survival either for the duration of the pregnancy or after birth. In a very indirect way, the health of the mother is affected by this, but not enough to likely be justification by itself for an abortion. Many women who terminate these pregnancies do so in order to try again sooner. The few women who might terminate a healthy baby are not part of the abortion rights viewpoint, and most would argue that no physician is likely to participate in such an abortion. As we know, though, there have been a few abortion providers who do not recognize a healthy fetus as reason to refuse to do an abortion. So, in the big picture, the typical woman and the typical doctor are given prominence, and the exceptional case of the amoral woman and doctor is ignored.

The latest from america

That is the question ghosts really should be made to answer: Why remain where you have been most miserable?
Terrance KleinMay 07, 2025
black smoke emerges from the sistine chapel on the first day of the conclave, the sky is a dark blue at 9 pm Rome time
As expected, the 133 cardinals who entered the Sistine Chapel May 7 failed to elect the next pope on their first ballot.
Now that the 133 cardinal electors are ensconced in the Sistine Chapel to elect a successor to Pope Francis, some potential candidates have come to the fore.
Gerard O’ConnellMay 07, 2025
When else do we get an opportunity like this, to take someone at this level of leadership at face value?
Molly CahillMay 07, 2025