Click here if you don’t see subscription options
The EditorsJanuary 28, 2015

The words poor and poverty seldom appeared in the State of the Union address delivered by President Obama on Jan. 20, but the policies the president proposed would benefit many working and lower income families. The president spoke in favor of expanding child care, instituting paid leave policies for workers and subsidizing community college costs. The speech was met with measured approval from Catholic advocates of social justice, including the Rev. Larry Snyder, outgoing president of Catholic Charities USA, who commended the president’s “bold ideas,” which could “break up the status quo that leaves so many on the sidelines.”

The speech was greeted with less enthusiasm by Republican leaders, who, in light of the Democrats’ lackluster performance in the November elections, marveled at the president’s confident approach. Indeed, as much as we may support President Obama’s desire to help working families, it is difficult, at least at first, to see how he will be able to reach consensus on these divisive issues. There is only so much the president can achieve by executive action.

Yet the State of the Union address may have been the opening salvo in an extended negotiation with Congress. On contentious issues like immigration, a grand bargain that includes concessions to both parties may still be possible. We hope so. Legislative success is needed both to help struggling families and to restore the nation’s faith in the political process. If no progress is made, public esteem for both Democrats and Republicans could fall still farther and pose grave problems for the next administration. 

The president was right to focus on working families, which both Democrats and Republicans claim to represent. Whether the two parties work together to bring about much-needed relief for these Americans, who still struggle even as the economy grows, will be a major test. Both sides, for example, recognize the importance of higher education for the long-term financial stability of families. Workers with college degrees fare much better in our economy than those with only a high school diploma. The president hopes to shrink that gap by making community colleges free. Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, meanwhile, has proposed an income-based repayment system for student loans, so graduates would not be overly burdened by the costs of their education. Both sides agree a problem exists. We hope there is room for negotiation and solutions that approach the problem from multiple angles.

Compromise may also be possible on the issue of child care and paid medical leave. Traditionally these have been Democratic issues. Last year Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and Representative Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, both Democrats, proposed the Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act, which would establish a national paid leave insurance program funded by worker salaries. The bill did not progress far, but as more women take seats in Congress and in the upper echelons of business, there may be more sympathy for the argument that families with two working parents need additional support. This should not be a Democratic or Republican issue. In fact, one could call it a pro-life issue, since it makes our community more welcoming and supportive of families with children.

In a statement commenting on the State of the Union, Father Snyder pointed out that the percentage of individuals and families living at or below the federal poverty line remains roughly where it was at the beginning of the War on Poverty. This is a discouraging fact that should prompt soul-searching on the part of both parties. “People of good will can have disagreements about the strategies to achieve a future without poverty,” Father Snyder said, “but what we cannot do is let divided government or differences of opinion prevent us from working together to strengthen pathways out of poverty for those in need.”

This year the Catholic Church has dedicated itself to reflecting on the challenges facing the family. Issues of divorce and remarriage have drawn much attention, but as our fellow Catholics in developing countries remind us, economic conditions also pull at the seams of the family unit. This is no less true in the United States than abroad. As Clayton Sinyai reported recently on our blog In All Things, marriage rates are higher for men who have stable, family-supporting jobs. “If the new normal is an economy employing large numbers of men at poverty wages,” Mr. Sinyai writes, “we are putting a dreadful burden on the institution of marriage in the interest of economic efficiency.”

To his credit, President Obama understands the vital connections between economic security and the flourishing of the family. His argument for working parents was invigorating to hear. But as any parent knows, supporting a family is the work of daily sacrifice and patient compromise. Creating family-friendly policies will require no less.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Rosemary McHugh
9 years 5 months ago
Thankyou for this very relevant article. I believe that since the Church claims to be pro-life, then it must support families by supporting the love between husband and wife, and supporting whatever method of birth control works to nourish the love between husband and wife. The ban on contraception and sterilization do not nourish the bond between the couple who have so much to cope with already. The bans on contraception and sterilization need to end, if the Roman Catholic Church is to be relevant in 2015 and beyond. NFP works for some couples and not for others. One size does not fit all, and it is unjust for the pope to act as if one size fits all, in regard to such a private issue between a couple. Sincerely, Dr Rosemary Eileen McHugh, M.D., M.Spir.
Lois Kerschen
9 years 5 months ago
For those of us who promote a "whole-life" policy, the need to support parents and their children is part of being pro-life. Organizations like Democrats for Life, Feminists for Life, and Consistent Life especially work on programs that fulfill the needs of the mothers and children after birth. Poverty is a pro-life issue because it endangers lives. At DFLA, we encourage those who favor the Democratic party because of its traditional championing of social justice to be active in the party to make it pro-life across the board and to run pro-life Democrats for office so that we can present our case with the strength of numbers.
P.M. Uram
9 years 5 months ago
Common sense, very refreshing.

The latest from america

Andrii Denysenko, CEO of design and production bureau "UkrPrototyp," stands by Odyssey, a 1,750-pound ground drone prototype, at a corn field in northern Ukraine, on June 28, 2024. Facing manpower shortages and uneven international assistance, Ukraine is struggling to halt Russia’s incremental but pounding advance in the east and is counting heavily on innovation at home. (AP Photo/Anton Shtuka)
Reports are already surfacing of drones launched into Russia that are relying on artificial, not human, intelligence in decisions to evade defensive countermeasures, pick targets and finally conclude a strike.
Kevin ClarkeJuly 18, 2024
I cannot tell you exactly why I am getting emotional, except to say that maybe I am sorely in the mood for something simple and nonaffected and happy and endearing and guileless. (Maybe everyone is?)
Joe Hoover, S.J.July 18, 2024
In an interview with America’s Gerard O’Connell, Cardinal José Tolentino de Mendonça discusses his love for cinema and poetry, what it’s like working in the Roman Curia and Pope Francis’ “Gospel simplicity.”
Gerard O’ConnellJuly 18, 2024
A movement known as Catholic integralism has been enjoying something of a revival in contemporary American political thought, especially among Catholic critics of liberalism and modernity. But history tells us that integralism can be more harmful than helpful.