What makes reading a social justice issue?

(iStock photo)

A recent study reported in The New York Times (8/3) determined that people who read books live an average of almost two years longer than nonreaders. Indeed, the lives of readers are likely to be not only longer but deeper. Reading can help develop empathy and build the capacity for more compassion, joy and love. As the United States observes September as National Literacy Month and students return to school, that is all the more reason to be concerned about access to reading and interest in it.

Americans’ current engagement in reading is somewhat difficult to assess. More than a decade ago, the National Endowment for the Arts issued a report called “Reading at Risk” (2004), concluding that the percentage of adult Americans reading literature had dropped dramatically. But a nearly contemporaneous Gallup survey in 2005 found that almost half of all Americans were reading a book at the time, an increase over the 1990 rate and more than double the 1957 rate. More recently, a Pew Research Center report in 2015 found that 80 percent of Americans between the ages of 16 and 29 had read a book in the past year and even showed that people in that age range were more likely than those over 30 to be book readers. The Pew data also show a marked increase in the variety of ways people read books, not only on e-readers but also on smartphones or tablets.


As encouraging as some of that data may be, however, there are also clear causes for concern. Literacy survey data collected in 2012 and 2014, the most recent available, show that 17 percent of Americans between the ages of 16 and 65 read at or below the lowest of the four levels of literacy competency assessed. Further, the share of those lacking reading skills is higher among the population that is unemployed or simply not in the labor force.

There are also indications that struggles with literacy can be generationally entrenched. The Foundation for Child Development found that children whose mothers had not graduated from high school, when compared with those whose mothers had a bachelor’s degree, were less than one third as likely to be reading proficiently in eighth grade. According to their report, “Mother’s Education and Children’s Outcomes” (2014), one in every eight children in the United States lives with a mother who has not graduated from high school. And “Children, Teens, and Reading” (Common Sense Media, 2014) documents a significant reading achievement gap between white and black or Hispanic students.

The correlations between socioeconomic status and reading ability are complicated. Inequitable distribution of resources and underfunding in school systems surely contribute, as does the fact that better-off families enjoy more time and flexibility for parents to act on their desire to read with children. No matter what is ultimately at the bottom of the link between poverty and literacy challenges, these statistics serve as a reminder that reading must not be treated as a luxury but as a basic and necessary human need that calls for a community response.

The reading process starts within the family, ideally with parents reading to their children at as early an age as possible. Schools, libraries and church communities should help prepare parents and provide them not only with books but also encouragement to read with their children, as a demonstration that they are important and loved.

Commitment to reading in schools should also be strengthened, to inculcate not only proficiency in reading skills but also a love of the worlds and insights that books open to readers. Both the traditional Great Books and more recent works from a wider variety of authors are important to help foster empathy and curiosity about the lives of others. In the recent best seller Lit Up (reviewed in Am., 8/29), David Denby reports on a year spent monitoring English classes in three different New York and Connecticut public high schools. He found teachers determined to motivate their students to read not only classics like Hemingway, Orwell and Hawthorne, but also authors such as Alice Walker and Amy Tan.

These students became passionately involved through creative assignments and fiery classroom debates. Books, one of our oldest technologies, helped connect them to different experiences, cultures and ideas with greater depth than even the most modern social media networks can offer.

Reading skills are necessary for any participation in the modern economy. But even more important, reading—especially of fiction—inspires readers, helping them grow in empathy, civility, spirituality and political responsibility. Lack of interest in reading is a social ill, leaving people less able to enter the marketplace of ideas or rescue their fellow citizens from injustice. Encouraging a love for reading is likely not only to improve the economic quality of life but also to deepen and enrich life shared together in society.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Ernie Sherretta
2 years 4 months ago
While I, a 68 year old, with several graduate degrees, can't argue the point, that reading is crucial to the formation and character of every individual, the age we live in is depending more on technological voices, sound bites and video snapshots. One's ability to read is being replaced by objects speaking to us, re: TV, iphones, cars, and the like. For the young, time is of the essence and it takes too long to read a book, an article, etc. Face it, magazines, books, newspapers are going to be the fossils of this age. We better find a way to communicate that incorporates the ability to absorb the huge amount of information required to educate the members of society. Maybe we humans need to learn from experience and human interaction as humanity did before writing and print became the normal means. Example and behavior is what is needed not just intellectual information. We have the most educated world population ever in human history and yet we commit such violence, ignore societal values, and disrespect each other within and outside our own cultures. The human tribe of old would never accept such behavior. We make "stars" out of killers, and the like because we can make money from that and because it is a form of "entertainment" Think about what was written years ago: “As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” ― H.L. Mencken
Richard Booth
2 years 4 months ago
I have no disagreement with the editors with respect to the importance of reading as a growth experience. However, it is very important what people are reading, not merely that they read. We are, as the editors indicated, a nation filled with too many functionally illiterate individuals, and this for myriad reasons. Priorities in the socialization process of children into and through early adulthood needs reviewing. What is the culture putting in the way of personal development? I taught college and university students for many decades and, at first, it amazed me how many first-year students tested into remedial reading and writing. K-12 had done them a great disservice by graduating them without proper literary tools. Some entered college without knowing what a sentence was. The editors mention parental education as a variable related to reading; I would also emphasize teacher literacy as a vital catalyst for the same. Teacher education desperately requires more demanding standards. Hence, the issue is one that concerns the entire society and its institutions. I appreciate this editorial's attention to reading.


The latest from america

In cities across the country, local activists marched in support of a progressive agenda centered on economic justice, racial justice and immigrant rights.
Brandon SanchezJanuary 20, 2019
Pope Francis has suppressed the Ecclesia Dei Commission, a significant decision with consequences for the Holy See’s relations with the priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X.
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 19, 2019
Photo: IMDB
A new Netflix miniseries brings out the story’s aspects of adventure and conflict, with occasionally pulse-pounding results.
Rob Weinert-KendtJanuary 19, 2019
Protestors march to support a U.N. anti-corruption commission in Guatemala City on Jan. 6. Photo by Jackie McVicar.
“What they are doing not only puts Guatemala at risk but the entire region. Bit by bit, for more than a year, they have been trying to divide us. The elections are at risk. We are six months away.”
Jackie McVicarJanuary 18, 2019