Editors: Panama Papers demonstrate need revisit U.S. tax policies

On tax evasion and hidden wealth, we are awash in a “sea of criminality,” said Jeffrey Sachs, an economist at Columbia University, on April 5. Mr. Sachs offered the opening lecture at the conference “For the Planet and the Poor,” sponsored by the Keough School of Global Affairs at the University of Notre Dame. Surveying the revelations emerging from the so-called Panama Papers, a vast, unauthorized dump of financial documents, he reiterated a point he has frequently made: The world is not bereft of the resources to end global poverty; it merely lacks the will—and in this instance the force of law—to do so.

Indeed, the Panama investigation, an unprecedented global collaboration among journalists wading through terabytes of financial chicanery, has provided a small glimpse behind the doors of law offices and financial institutions that specialize in laundering large sums of money, hiding it away from the global public and tax authorities. The ongoing investigation has demonstrated how just one firm has helped obscure the wealth of well-known figures from business and politics around the world. Scores of political figures, including members of the Chinese Politburo and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s inner circle, as well as faded celebrities and sports idols, have been exposed by the leak. Only a handful of American addresses have appeared so far. This is not cause for relief or complacency, however. “U.S. citizens have no reason to contact a law firm in Panama” to hide their money, a German newspaper wrote. “That’s because offshore companies can easily be created in U.S. states such as Wyoming, Delaware or Nevada.”


“The United States is smart,” Sachs wryly notes. “We’ve legalized it all.” If so, it is time to revisit U.S. policies that have been overly kind to an already enriched few and cruelly parsimonious before a world of crying need.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
William Rydberg
2 years 9 months ago
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, Item #2409 - presented without comment: 2409 Even if it does not contradict the provisions of civil law, any form of unjustly taking and keeping the property of others is against the seventh commandment: thus, deliberate retention of goods lent or of objects lost; business fraud; paying unjust wages; forcing up prices by taking advantage of the ignorance or hardship of another. The following are also morally illicit: speculation in which one contrives to manipulate the price of goods artificially in order to gain an advantage to the detriment of others; corruption in which one influences the judgment of those who must make decisions according to law; appropriation and use for private purposes of the common goods of an enterprise; work poorly done; tax evasion; forgery of checks and invoices; excessive expenses and waste. Willfully damaging private or public property is contrary to the moral law and requires reparation. in Christ,
Lisa Weber
2 years 9 months ago
Thank you for this editorial. The USA is long overdue for tax reform that closes loopholes and taxes the wealthy more than it taxes the middle class and poor.


The latest from america

In cities across the country, local activists marched in support of a progressive agenda centered on economic justice, racial justice and immigrant rights.
Brandon SanchezJanuary 20, 2019
Pope Francis has suppressed the Ecclesia Dei Commission, a significant decision with consequences for the Holy See’s relations with the priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X.
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 19, 2019
Photo: IMDB
A new Netflix miniseries brings out the story’s aspects of adventure and conflict, with occasionally pulse-pounding results.
Rob Weinert-KendtJanuary 19, 2019
Protestors march to support a U.N. anti-corruption commission in Guatemala City on Jan. 6. Photo by Jackie McVicar.
“What they are doing not only puts Guatemala at risk but the entire region. Bit by bit, for more than a year, they have been trying to divide us. The elections are at risk. We are six months away.”
Jackie McVicarJanuary 18, 2019