Editors: Panama Papers demonstrate need revisit U.S. tax policies

On tax evasion and hidden wealth, we are awash in a “sea of criminality,” said Jeffrey Sachs, an economist at Columbia University, on April 5. Mr. Sachs offered the opening lecture at the conference “For the Planet and the Poor,” sponsored by the Keough School of Global Affairs at the University of Notre Dame. Surveying the revelations emerging from the so-called Panama Papers, a vast, unauthorized dump of financial documents, he reiterated a point he has frequently made: The world is not bereft of the resources to end global poverty; it merely lacks the will—and in this instance the force of law—to do so.

Indeed, the Panama investigation, an unprecedented global collaboration among journalists wading through terabytes of financial chicanery, has provided a small glimpse behind the doors of law offices and financial institutions that specialize in laundering large sums of money, hiding it away from the global public and tax authorities. The ongoing investigation has demonstrated how just one firm has helped obscure the wealth of well-known figures from business and politics around the world. Scores of political figures, including members of the Chinese Politburo and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s inner circle, as well as faded celebrities and sports idols, have been exposed by the leak. Only a handful of American addresses have appeared so far. This is not cause for relief or complacency, however. “U.S. citizens have no reason to contact a law firm in Panama” to hide their money, a German newspaper wrote. “That’s because offshore companies can easily be created in U.S. states such as Wyoming, Delaware or Nevada.”


“The United States is smart,” Sachs wryly notes. “We’ve legalized it all.” If so, it is time to revisit U.S. policies that have been overly kind to an already enriched few and cruelly parsimonious before a world of crying need.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
William Rydberg
2 years 1 month ago
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, Item #2409 - presented without comment: 2409 Even if it does not contradict the provisions of civil law, any form of unjustly taking and keeping the property of others is against the seventh commandment: thus, deliberate retention of goods lent or of objects lost; business fraud; paying unjust wages; forcing up prices by taking advantage of the ignorance or hardship of another. The following are also morally illicit: speculation in which one contrives to manipulate the price of goods artificially in order to gain an advantage to the detriment of others; corruption in which one influences the judgment of those who must make decisions according to law; appropriation and use for private purposes of the common goods of an enterprise; work poorly done; tax evasion; forgery of checks and invoices; excessive expenses and waste. Willfully damaging private or public property is contrary to the moral law and requires reparation. in Christ,
Lisa Weber
2 years 1 month ago
Thank you for this editorial. The USA is long overdue for tax reform that closes loopholes and taxes the wealthy more than it taxes the middle class and poor.


Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

The news from Ireland and the United States remind us of Herod, of Pharaoh. What culture betrays its children?
The EditorsMay 26, 2018
A woman religious casts her ballot May 25 in Dublin as Ireland holds a referendum on its law on abortion. Voters went to the polls May 25 to decide whether to liberalize the country's abortion laws. (CNS photo/Alex Fraser, Reuters)
The repeal of Ireland's Eighth Amendment, which guarantees the right to life of the unborn, is passing by a 2-1 margin with most of the votes counted.
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies at a House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Tuesday, May 22, 2018, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
The Secretary of Education stirred up controversy when she said it was up to schools to decide if an undocumented student should be reported to authorities.
J.D. Long-GarcíaMay 25, 2018
Thousands gathered in Dublin May 12 to say "Love Both" and "Vote No" to abortion on demand. They were protesting abortion on demand in the forthcoming referendum May 25. (CNS photo/John McElroy)
“Priests and bishops get verbal abuse by being told, ‘How can you speak for women? You don’t know what it’s like!’”
America StaffMay 25, 2018