Not a Maverick Pope

Pope Francis will stand on American soil for the first time at 4 p.m. local time on Sept. 22, when he steps off an Alitalia plane at Andrews Air Force Base near Washington, D.C. Sources close to him say he has been looking forward to this moment, when at last he can make direct contact with the American people and open his heart to them.

His visit is arousing phenomenal interest and has given rise to attempts by commentators to reduce the man and his message to the political, ideological and cultural categories that characterize public discourse among Americans in general and among Catholics as well:  Is he a liberal or a conservative?  Do his social teachings validate more the Republican or the Democratic political agenda?  Is he more  aligned with the thinking of John XXIII and Paul VI or that of John Paul II and Benedict XVI?  Does he embrace or reject American culture, society and economic life and, for that matter, the American people themselves?

Advertisement

I believe that those who seek validation from the pope’s visit of any particular viewpoint framed by such categories will be deeply disappointed.  Hence, I think it’s important to understand that the centerpieces of Francis’ message and witness, like those of the Gospel itself, escape all such classifications in essential ways.

To begin with, Pope Francis embraces wholeheartedly the clear doctrinal tradition of the church, while emphasizing that at the heart of that doctrine is the affirmation of the God of mercy, whose first act toward each of us is a loving embrace precisely in the face of our own failings.  While such emphasis has been warmly welcomed by believers worldwide, it has caused self-declared custodians of orthodoxy to subtly query his commitment to church doctrine, while overlooking the fundamental fact that it is he—as successor of Peter—not they, who is the guarantor of faith and unity in the church.

Like his Polish and German predecessors, Francis proclaims a social doctrine that bisects the current political divide in American society and affirms respect for the life and dignity of the human person at every stage of existence, an affirmation that is neither liberal nor conservative in the contemporary political lexicon and is not a selective morality.

This first Jesuit pope is a man of extraordinary inner peace but also a shaker and mover in the church and the world. He is a truly free man, not bound to any particular interests except those of Jesus. He continues to remind the whole church that “the poor” are at the heart of the Gospel and underscores the preferential option for the poor, solidarity and inclusion. He calls for an economy that puts the human person, not profit, at the center and highlights the urgent need to care for “our common home.”

Francis is a man of dialogue, committed to the culture of encounter, who looks for the best in people and is not judgmental. He is a peacemaker and strategist who contributed significantly to the rapprochement between the United States and Cuba, tried to break the Israeli-Palestinian impasse and pushes hard for peace in Syria, Iraq, Ukraine and other lands.

Some portray him as a maverick, but this misleading depiction fails to understand that Francis is a pope who is ever listening to what the Spirit is saying to the church, and this results in an element of what some call unpredictability or surprise. The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, grasped this well during their first meeting and afterwards described Francis as “a man of extraordinary humanity, on fire with the Spirit of Jesus.”

This is the pope who is about to visit the United States. He comes as a pastor, a humble pastor, who never puts himself above anybody. He comes to reach out and embrace not just Catholics but all Americans, whatever the color of their skin, ethnic origin, religious creed, political allegiance or economic condition. He sees each one as first and foremost a child of God, loved by Jesus, a brother or sister whom he loves too. That is his starting point.

His personal decisions to speak to Congress and at Ground Zero are the clearest testimony to the fact that Francis wants to encounter and embrace all the people of the United States in their pain and their ideals, their aspirations and their failures, their greatness and their love.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
L J
3 years 1 month ago
Thank you for the well thought out article, concise and on target. Westerners are obsessed with Left/Right, Progressive/Traditional, Conservative/Liberal paradigms. Land on any "catholic" website and you can see the same patterns. You can deduce whether the site is worth your time in a manner of seconds: is there an angry rhetoric blasting the Pope for not doing "x, y and/or z?" We know where they are going. Noise. Is there a bent of the Pope not doing "enough"? Yet more cacophony not worth the pixels that take up the computer screen. We see in other parts of civilizations (Latin America, Africa, Asia, Oceana, Caribbean, et al) that people have thankfully not adopted such darkness. They literally have little as it is and yet they still have a culture of encounter. They break bread with each other, with what little they have, they greet each other on the streets, raise their families as best they can and go forward. In the West we no longer break bread with each other: Catholics barely say a word to each other at Mass, opting instead to be consumed with their "smart" phones and hide behind computer screens. We are not a culture of the encounter but about fighting, attacking, denigrating, aborting each other. The Pro-Life movement needs to evolve into how we treat each other postpartum. Put down your hammer, bullhorn and keyboard. Encounter your neighbor. Your golden calf has lost its luster and obstructs the view of your landscape "Come there is much work to do. Let us begin" - Mother Teresa of Calcutta
E.Patrick Mosman
3 years 1 month ago
"I believe that those who seek validation from the pope’s visit of any particular viewpoint framed by such categories will be deeply disappointed." The more Pope Francis speaks "off the cuff" before crowds or especially reporters, the more he reminds me of Chance the gardener, better known as Chauncey Gardiner, from the movie 'Being There' who spoke simple words, spoken often due to confusion or to a stating of the obvious, which are repeatedly misunderstood as profound and often, in the Pope's case, of a possible/potential change in long held Catholic doctrine which is walked back or explained later by a Vatican spokesperson. Is it any wonder that different people hear different signals when the Pope speaks?

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018