Muslims are already denouncing terrorism, why aren't we hearing them?

Living in New York City in the 1990s, it was easy to know what the cardinal archbishop was thinking regarding current events. A distinct memory from that pre-Internet age was that it seemed as if The New York Post and The Daily News had regular features screaming out, “Card Sez…” followed by a provocative quote from Cardinal John O’Connor in bold letters on the tabloids’ front pages. 

Over the past few years, I’ve been reminded of one quotation in particular. In response to the murder of an abortion doctor in Florida by an antiabortion extremist in 1944, Cardinal O’Connor commented: “If anyone has an urge to kill an abortionist, let him kill me instead. That’s about as clearly as I can renounce such madness.” 

Advertisement

I remember being impressed by how deft and unequivocal the reaction was. He wasted no time condemning an abominable crime committed by another self-professed, pro-life Christian. 

I’ve found myself referencing that quotation in conversations over the past year with Muslims and others about acts of terror by Islamic extremists. Where are those unequivocal voices in the Muslim world condemning these attacks? I’ve confessed frustration and confusion that the first reports of a Muslim response after the Paris attacks dealt with a protest against xenophobia instead of a call to communal mourning among Parisians of all ethnic and religious backgrounds.

In many of these discussions, I’ve heard numerous thoughtful and well-educated Catholics, Christians and Jews quietly express a similar dismay. “The enlightenment has yet to reach Islam” some have said. “It needs to go through its own Reformation moment akin to Christianity.” Others fear that Islam is incompatible with religious freedom and pluralistic democracy. 

With these concerns as a backdrop, the Syrian refugee crisis can become a source of great anxiety for people of good will who are trying to reconcile their desire to welcome the stranger with their fear that this stranger might only want to destroy them. 

“You can’t have a conversation without context,” Anthony Cernera, president of the Center for Interreligious Understanding, told me regarding our encounter with Islam. But the sad truth is that we have desperately little context for understanding Islam in the West. Even the most superficial Google search yields an overwhelming amount of evidence showing how vocal countless Muslim individuals and institutions have in fact been and continue to be in denouncing terrorism. Why aren’t we hearing it, then?

John Esposito, founding director of Georgetown’s Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, cites astonishing research on the media that helps explain “why people of good faith don’t know” the reality about Islam. One study of nearly a million stories from U.S. and European media outlets between 2001 and 2011 found that in 2001, 2 percent of all those stories presented images of Muslim militants, while just over 0.5 percent presented stories of ordinary Muslims. By 2011, 25 percent of the stories dealt with militancy, while images of ordinary Muslims remained at 0.5 percent. The negative coverage has only increased since then. 

If Muslim terrorists represent only a fraction of a fraction of 1 percent of the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims, this lopsided coverage looks like a type of hysterical fixation on the part of the media that ultimately does not serve our Muslim neighbors, or us, well at all. 

Dr. Hussein Rashid, a Muslim American who teaches religious studies and consults on religious literacy, has also experienced a form of selective inattention even when the message is constructive. After the bombing attempt in Times Square in 2010, Dr. Rashid—who was born and raised in New York—and two Muslim colleagues were on every major network and cable TV outlet all day condemning the action. That night he gave a talk to 200 people and asked how many had seen the coverage. “Of the 190 people who claimed to be watching TV that day, how many of them remembered seeing us? Zero,” he said. “The narrative had already been set.”

The narrative in general regarding Islam in the United States and Europe has been set for quite a while. For all of our sakes, it is time to begin writing a more nuanced story.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
John Walton
2 years 5 months ago
If you think it's bad here, stateside, the attitude in England is poisonous. In a recent issue of "The Spectator" a statistic cited was that 70% of London Muslims would refuse to "grass" on a friend. I would suggest, however, that the author view the Pew Organization polling data of the attitudes of citizens toward suicide bombing. As an example, for the society nearest Europe, Turkey, 54% of the polled cohort consider suicide bombing to be "never acceptable", yet 16% consider it to be "often", or "sometimes" acceptable. http://www.pewglobal.org/2013/09/10/muslim-publics-share-concerns-about-extremist-groups/
Bill McGarvey
2 years 5 months ago

Thanks for your comment, John. I'd be interested in seeing that statistic from The Spectator. Do you have a URL you can paste in here? Thanks for sending the Pew link, those are interesting statistics. I will have to look deeper but my guess is the polling on suicide bombing would be closely linked to feelings about Palestinians and their treatment by Israel. Certainly a complex issue. 

The Pew stats also refer to Muslim countries. The reality is certainly different in the US where Muslims are the second best educated religious group behind Jews. I don't have much information for the UK.

This is not to say that there aren't issues that need to be addressed in terms of the West's relationship with Islam. There are but looking at Islam in its totality and making statements about that is like making statements on Christianity as if it's monolithic. If we were to put a Russian Orthodox Patriarch in the same room as a member of the Pentecostal Church of God Holiness in Appalachia that practices snake handling labeling them both as "Christian"--which they both profess to be--is about as descriptive and predictive as saying they are both "human."

John Esposito, from Georgetown’s Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, has a wonderful book "The Future of Islam" (Oxford University Press) that really gets into great detail about the tremendous diversity in Islam as well as the presence of reformers within Islam today.

 

John Gates
2 years 2 months ago
Noorani Travel joys the opportunity to provide our Muslim brothers and sisters in the UK to visit Mecca and Medina for Hajj and Umrah. Our all inclusive packages Umrah and Hajj offer direct flights from London, confirmed Visa and luxury accommodation of 5 stars. TEL :0208-819-3505 Visit us for more Details : www.nooranitravel.co.uk
Lisa Weber
2 years 5 months ago
Thank you for calling for more nuanced reporting. My concern with Islam is less about terrorism than it is about its treatment of women. If Islam becomes a significant factor in religion and politics in this country, what will that mean for women? I would appreciate seeing some factual reporting on that aspect of Islam. People will always condemn terrorism, but poor treatment of women is too often considered acceptable.
John Walton
2 years 5 months ago
The statistic is discussed by Rod Liddle in an April 23, 2016 opinion column, citing a film and results from a poll: "For a start, there was the fallout from Trevor Phillips’s excellent film about Islam in Britain, in which he reported, via an ICM poll, that two thirds of British Muslims would refuse to grass on a fellow Muslim, no matter how much ricin he was storing in his lock-up. And the added worry that virtually none share our outlook on life, don’t want to integrate and possess views about Jewish people which Ernst Röhm would have thought a bit gamey."

Advertisement

The latest from america

 10.17.2018 Pope Francis greets Cardinal Blase J. Cupich of Chicago before a session of the Synod of Bishops on young people, the faith and vocational discernment at the Vatican Oct. 16. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
“We take people where they are, walking with them, moving forward,” Cardinal Blase Cupich said.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 20, 2018
Catherine Pakaluk, who currently teaches at the Catholic University of America and holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, describes her tweet to Mr. Macron as “spirited” and “playful.”
Emma Winters October 19, 2018
A new proposal from the Department of Homeland Security could make it much more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards in the United States. But even before its implementation, the proposal has led immigrants to avoid receiving public benefits.
J.D. Long-GarcíaOctober 19, 2018
 Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, then nuncio to the United States, and then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, are seen in a combination photo during the beatification Mass of Blessed Miriam Teresa Demjanovich at the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart in Newark, N.J., Oct. 4, 2014. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
In this third letter Archbishop Viganò no longer insists, as he did so forcefully in his first letter, that the restrictions that he claimed Benedict XVI had imposed on Archbishop McCarrick—one he alleges that Pope Francis later lifted—can be understood as “sanctions.”
Gerard O’ConnellOctober 19, 2018