Is Donald Trump bent on world conquest?

Love him or loathe him, people can’t stop talking about Donald J. Trump, almost always in hyperbolic terms.

As I write this, Mitt Romney has just uttered his very unlike-Mitt Romney cri de coeur about the intolerable impending fate the Republican Party is about to meet if Mr. Trump becomes its presidential candidate. Now that the unlikely may become the inevitable, Republican leaders are in full-throated cry that the end of the Republican Party as we know it is upon us.


This does not seem the worst thing in the world, given how much the Republican Party has become the Party of No. And the Republican angst on display does have its diverting side. Mr. Trump’s deviation from party orthodoxy—on trade, taxes, entitlements and other issues—has party leaders between a rock and a hard place. Do they embrace the outsider who has wriggled into the fold, bringing new voters with him, or turn to the much-disliked but more ideologically reliable Ted Cruz?

Mr. Trump has scrambled the Republican Party into a frenzy. Listening to his rivals on the debate stage assail him as a liar, a fraud, a phony and con man, you might think that if he wins the nomination Republicans will have to forgo partisanship this fall and vote Democratic. But no. Apparently the good of the country extends only so far.

The Democrats are hardly to be outdone in their loud repudiations of Mr. Trump. Last weekend I went to a party where my hostess compared him to Hitler and the U.S. economy to that of post-World War I Germany. These are big statements, almost Trumplike in their overreach. Certainly, we have problems in this country, and both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump are tapping into Americans’ anxieties: about their own economic prospects, about the growing divide between rich and poor, about the capture of our democracy by special interest groups and oligarchs.

Still, to compare the economy of the United States, which is actually doing pretty well, with that of post-World War I Germany is a considerable stretch. So is the comparison of Trump with Hitler. The man is a populist egomaniac playing to people’s xenophobia, but is he bent on world conquest? I don’t think so. He wants to wall off the United States from the rest of the world, not plant the flag in non-American soil.

The pendulum always swings. Whatever criticisms you have of Barack Obama, he is a sophisticated man possessed of elegance and grace. Perhaps it’s surprising, then, that the Republican front-runner to succeed him is a loud-mouthed vulgarian. If by chance Mr. Trump becomes president, the American public will soon be remembering fondly Obama’s fine qualities: his intelligence, his discretion, his scandal-free administration. He has not always provided answers, but few people suggest that he does not have a good grasp of the problems.

Enter Donald Trump, the blow-hard and braggart, the thrice-married man with several bankruptcies in his past and a string of lawsuits in his present, the man for whom everything is very simple. ISIS? Syria? Not to worry. He is very, very smart and will quickly sort out those pesky problems in the Middle East.

Mr. Trump is not Hitler so much as our own Silvio Berlusconi, the billionaire businessman and former prime minister of Italy whose time in office was marked by corruption charges, sex scandals and verbal gaffes. Like Berlusconi, Trump is a rich man with the common touch. Authenticity is what he has going for him. His candor, even more than his nationalism, is what supporters like. What detractors see as abusiveness his admirers see as courage and evidence of integrity.

A contest between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton will pit polar opposites. One is well-qualified and experienced; the other is very much not. She is controlled and disciplined; he is dynamic and loose-lipped. He seems unscripted and unfiltered. Her every word seems carefully crafted and run through a political calculus.

And yet there’s a curiosity factor with both. What does each really believe? Mr. Trump seems so entirely pragmatic one wonders if he has any principles. Clinton seems like she does, but she’s so much the politician you’re never going to find out what they are.

It will be an interesting match, and you can count on the rhetoric escalating. Even now it’s as over the top as Mr. Trump’s hairstyle.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
William Rydberg
2 years 9 months ago
In my opinion, its disappointing to read in a Catholic Jesuit publication not one word about working to change the political system. Not even a whiff about GC35. Everywhere one turns, advocacy for political bloques with entrenched positions that don't square with Catholic moral teaching is taken for granted by the American Catholic Intelligencia-to a man, simply no exceptions... Nobody really listens to Pope Francis, so sad... Instead, choosing government has been reduced to personalities. so many Vendus entrenched in American Catholic Intelligencia making politics out to be a type of Catholic Hollywood Squares. I had hoped Roman Catholic America Magazine wouldn't succomb to the Vendus and their bottomless hunger for strings-attached federal monies. The Catholic Intelligencia seems to treat the USCCB as though they were donkeys should they mention Catholic moral teaching. "Sophistication?" appears to be the most important quality, political checks and balances, not discussed. Are American Catholics wrong to demand their own full-throated voice, I hope and pray that they do not hold back, speaking the Truth in Love, for Catholics are the conscience of post-modern America. And America's True Hope. God bless the United States of America... Just my opinion in The Risen Christ
Mike Evans
2 years 9 months ago
It is pure ignorance, stubborn suspension of rational thinking, and out right hate for Obama and Hillary that is fueling this Trump phenomena. After the conventions when the dust settles, Mr. Trump will be rejected as well as his chicken-hearted supporters responding to his crude, rude and misogynist statements. Or else, we are destined to a very dismal and terrifying time in America.
Gabriel Marcella
2 years 9 months ago
The comparison to Hitler and Mussolini may not be appropriate, but it is a sad commentary on our politics that the comparison has to be made. Trump may not be exactly like them, but he can still be a menace. His strident, ill-informed and crude language, appeal to victimization, hyper-nationalism, incitement to violence, lightweight and counterproductive policy positions (especially on national security) are not the qualities of a statesman and presidential timber. They are the qualities of an amoral demagogue who will disappoint his followers because the United States is not a kingdom. The checks and balances in our system will defeat his preposterous proposals if he's elected president, a very unlikely prospect due to high unfavorability ratings. If Trump is "authentic" we should keep in mind that many demagogues and authoritarians in history have been "authentic," including Hitler and Mussolini.


The latest from america

Protestors march to support a U.N. anti-corruption commission in Guatemala City on Jan. 6. Photo by Jackie McVicar.
“What they are doing not only puts Guatemala at risk but the entire region. Bit by bit, for more than a year, they have been trying to divide us. The elections are at risk. We are six months away.”
Jackie McVicarJanuary 18, 2019
“We will just do what we need to do to help people in need,” said Antonio Fernandez, C.E.O. of Catholic Charities for the Archdiocese of San Antonio.
Emma Winters January 18, 2019
The study found Latina immigrant women in Arizona who were pregnant during the contentious S.B. 1070 passage had babies with lower birthweight compared with those in prior years. Average birth weights did not decrease among U.S.-born white, black or Latina women during the same time.
J.D. Long-GarcíaJanuary 18, 2019
This week's guest is Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa, founder of New Wave Feminists, a pro-life feminist organization dedicated to changing the divisive language surrounding the abortion debate.
Olga SeguraJanuary 18, 2019