Nuclear disarmament conference ends with a whimper

A woman waves a flag during a nuclear weapons protest April 13 outside Faslane Naval Base in Helensburgh, Scotland ( CNS photo/Joey Kelly, EPA).

The conference on nuclear disarmament at the United Nations ended on May 22 not with a bang but a whimper. After weeks of wrangling, the review conference on the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which convenes every five years, had at its tepid close little to show in the way of accomplishment—again. It did not succeed in establishing new goals for weapons reduction or new strategies for curtailing the proliferation of nuclear weapons-grade materials. In fact, participants were unable even to agree on a joint final statement, bogged down as they were in renewed discord over a proposed regional conference to negotiate a nuclear weapons-free zone in the Middle East.

This discouraging outcome suggests five more years of geopolitical drift instead of progress on the reduction of nuclear weapons, five years during which 59 nations with access to fissile materials—highly enriched uranium and plutonium that can be used in the production of nuclear weapons—may be tempted to take steps toward joining the nine declared nuclear-armed states. To describe this as a “missed opportunity” deeply diminishes the nature of the threat the treaty signatories have neglected for another half decade. Drew Christiansen, S.J., distinguished professor of ethics and global development at Georgetown University and former editor in chief of America, warns that after two review failures in a row, the treaty’s “binding power is weakening.”

Advertisement

That is a prospect that should be setting off alarms but seems to have inspired only pro forma notes of regret. The world has made welcome progress in recent decades in reducing stockpiles of nuclear weapons and fissile materials, but that progress has been stalled for years even as new tensions between nuclear-armed powers have emerged.

Those escalating tensions, while they make negotiations more difficult, are dramatic evidence of the pressing need for progress toward disarmament. Some 16,000 nuclear warheads are still in service in potential theaters of conflict around the world; 1,800 of them are on high alert status, ready to be launched within 15 minutes.

Meanwhile, the continued production and maintenance of nuclear weapons pose an inestimable threat to workers, host communities, military staff and the environment; and fissile material remains vulnerable to terrorist acquisition. The United States and Russia, instead of working together to reboot the joint progress on disarmament made in the near past, are preparing what may turn out to be a new arms race. Modernization programs on both sides will divert billions of dollars from the needs of vulnerable people around the world to the service of “improving” and reproducing weapons whose potential use and upkeep are already a moral scandal and a budgetary drain.

It is essential, of course, to restore credibility and effectiveness to the N.P.T. process, but the rest of the world should not sit idly by as leaders of nuclear-armed states sideline themselves from the discussion. A growing civic-society effort to outlaw nuclear weapons, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, promises to shame nuclear powers into action.

The Vatican and the U.S. bishops have in recent months given reinvigorated attention to this existential global threat. Statements by the Holy See have challenged the moral legitimacy of the policy of deterrence, and the bishops in April urged renewed U.S. attention to disarmament. The church has reiterated its longstanding belief that complete nuclear disarmament is the world’s only moral option. The Vatican should keep this matter before the eyes of the international public even as it ratchets up the pressure on geopolitical leaders. The church can be a powerful ally to anti-nuke campaigners, providing spiritual sustenance to the movement as well as a credible and comprehensive analysis of the practical ethics of disarmament.

Meanwhile, the United States should reconsider its recurring role as protector of Israel’s nuclear ambiguity and urge this undeclared nuclear power to come clean on its capacity and the potential hazards created by its nuclear weapons program. That could provide a welcome boost to the legitimacy and credibility of the treaty enterprise itself.

Geopolitical leaders need to take responsibility for recent N.P.T. failures and seek new ways to prevent nuclear harm. If the N.P.T. process is indeed hopelessly stalled, progress must be sought by other avenues. Cooperative threat reduction has been a victim of the recent deterioration in relations between the United States and the Russian Federation. That essential effort secures and neutralizes nuclear materials scattered around the former Soviet Union. Reviving it, despite tensions over the crisis in Ukraine, could help restore the cooperative ethos now draining from the N.P.T. process. That may be enough to get it back on track toward its long-term goal of a nuclear weapons-free world.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Leonard Villa
2 years 11 months ago
"Statements by the Holy See have challenged the moral legitimacy of the policy of deterrence, and the bishops in April urged renewed U.S. attention to disarmament." Really? Well it has kept the peace in a world of totalitarian and thug dictatorships with nukes, eg Soviet Union-Russia, Korea, Pakistan,China etc. It is fool's gold to trust the UN in such a matter because that institution is opposed to Realpolitik. Do you really trust Iran to keep a nuclear agreement? Or Putin? This type of anti-nuke policy only emboldens the thug regimes who could care less about the UN and the US bishops or Vatican anti-nuke sentiment. It is to look at nukes, deterrence, etc. in terms of the moral circumstances of 2015 and not in an idealistic vacuum.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh and his disciples at Rajneeshpuram (Credit: Netflix)
Sometimes the best way to understand a phenomenon is to look at its parody.
José DueñoMay 24, 2018
Chris Rock (photo: Netflix)
“Tambourine” should be mandatory viewing in all diocesan Pre-Cana programs.
Jake MartinMay 24, 2018
Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. with The University of Notre Dame President Rev. Theodore M. Hesburgh, C.S.C., Rev. Edgar Chandler (far left), and Msgr. Robert J. Hagarty of Chicago (far right) at the Illinois Rally for Civil Rights in Chicago's Soldier Field, 1964. (The University of Notre Dame Archives)
Every individual, organization, institution and structure in the church must do something to counter the intensification of the racial divide in our country.
Edward K. BraxtonMay 24, 2018
An official wedding photo of Britain's Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, center, in Windsor Castle, Windsor, England. Others in photo from left, back row, Jasper Dyer, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, Prince Charles, Doria Ragland, Prince William; center row, Brian Mulroney, Prince Philip, Queen Elizabeth II, Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, Princess Charlotte, Prince George, Rylan Litt, John Mulroney; front row, Ivy Mulroney, Florence van Cutsem, Zalie Warren, Remi Litt. (Alexi Lubomirski/Kensington Palace via AP)
A poll found that 66 percent of the British public declared they were not interested in the Windsor wedding.
David StewartMay 23, 2018