Current Comment

Unreasonable Seizures

Many Americans may be surprised to learn their car, house, cash and jewelry can be sued by the government (e.g., United States v. One Pearl Necklace and United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins). And, unlike people, personal property is not presumed innocent until proven guilty. A little-known practice called civil forfeiture enables law enforcement officials to confiscate assets that they suspect were obtained illegally, without charging, much less convicting, the owner with a crime.

The Justice Department created the nationwide civil asset forfeiture program in the 1980s as a way to go after criminal enterprises. Under the department’s Equitable Sharing program, state and local police can keep up to 80 percent of the assets seized. The initiative was well intentioned: use the ill-gotten gains of lawbreakers to compensate victims and fund crime-fighting efforts. But, unsurprisingly, the practice is prone to widespread abuse. An investigation by The Washington Post documented many cases in which innocent Americans, often drivers pulled over for minor traffic infractions, had large sums of cash taken by the police on unfounded suspicions of drug trafficking. Those who can afford it pay an attorney and endure long legal battles to get their money back. But most cannot. Confiscation of cash and property has become a “routine source of funding for law enforcement” in the face of ever tightening budgets.

Advertisement

John Yoder and Brad Cates, former directors of the Justice Department’s forfeiture office, called for the abolishment of the program, writing in The Washington Post (9/18) that it is “at odds with our judicial system” and “unreformable.” Law enforcement officers provide a vital public service. Their efforts should be adequately funded with public money, not the police’s own ill-gotten gains.

A Proper Vietnam History

History never dies. It lives in those who experience it, study it and try to reshape its future telling. If we celebrate it carelessly, its lessons will be lost. Therefore, the Pentagon’s plan to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Vietnam War with a $15 million multimedia celebration—including a website, exhibits, symposiums and oral history projects—needs an overhaul.

Its stated purpose, to “honor and respect Vietnam veterans and their families,” is worthy. The war’s context is much broader. That is why more than 500 scholars, veterans and activists have signed a petition demanding the right to correct the Pentagon’s version of history. The portions of the program now online are already riddled with errors and omissions. The 1968 My Lai massacre is described as an “incident,” as if it were an exception rather than one of many bloody scandals. The plan neglects the details of the great protests: the tear gas and beatings at the Chicago Democratic Convention in 1968 and the march on Nov. 15, 1969, of 250,000 anti-war protesters on the nation’s capital.

The next step is clear: turn the project over to a non-profit organization, independent of the Pentagon, led by a committee of prominent, publicly identified historians, representing all viewpoints, to advise and direct the creators. Otherwise, the end result will likely be a selective narrative of the war that can be used by the government as propaganda to support similar conduct around the world.

A Treacherous Task

Gold remains a resource curse for the Mayan people of Guatemala even as mining the precious metal continues to create fortunes for others. In this century, it is Canadian mining interests that seek access to Guatemala’s mineral wealth. Too often when powerful conglomerates secure access to a promising site, the wealth is extracted—and exported—but the ecological damage and poverty are left behind. For years, indigenous communities in Guatemala have resisted large-scale mining operations, and the resulting clash has sometimes turned violent.

An Amnesty International report released on Sept. 19 found that government policy, plowing ahead with mining agreements without consulting local communities, was exacerbating tensions in Guatemala’s mining region. In what surely comes under the heading of thankless tasks, the Catholic Church in Guatemala has been asked by President Otto Pérez Molina to mediate disputes between mine operators and indigenous communities in order to head off the potential for more bloodshed. Local bishops have in the past vigorously defended Mayan communities, particularly the bishop of Huehuetenango, Álvaro Ramazzini Imeri, who has called for a moratorium on new licenses, complaining that mining interests only “leave crumbs” behind. He has been rewarded for his outspokenness with death threats.

While it is worthwhile to intervene to keep the peace, would-be deal brokers or breakers from the church will surely be challenged to balance conflicting interests. This could be an opportunity to bring Catholic social ethics into practical civic play or for the government and mining conglomerates to co-opt local church leadership. Church officials must take care that they are not being mined for mercy by corporate or government interests with hidden agendas.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
Robert O'Connell
2 years 11 months ago
Frankly, why not just cancel the appropriation? This is not an essential expense. It is, however, supposed to "honor and respect Vietnam veterans and their families" not serve as a history of the era. Neither Mai Lai nor the protests serve that purpose. Please remember, the veterans served, either as draftees or enlisted -- and not in a volunteer army: they did stuff, too many died. Why not honor them and their families?
Richard Borowski
2 years 11 months ago
It has been interesting to watch the concern about middle eastern Christians being persecuted for their religion and to recall that Vietnamese fled the North and fought the Viet Cong, in part, for the freedom to practice their Catholic faith. We've seen theological contortions to support military action in one case and reflex anti-war reactions in the other.

Advertisement

Don't miss the best from America

Sign up for our Newsletter to get the Jesuit perspective on news, faith and culture.

The latest from america

Hong Kong residents hold a banner that reads: “Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake.” The Occupy Central movement was initiated as an effort to force the Hong Kong and Chinese governments to allow true democracy in the city. (CNS photo/Francis Wong)
“I believe it’s essential for some people to go to jail for the sake of democracy. It will in the end strengthen the movement.”
Verna YuOctober 17, 2017
In a zombie world, the good Samaritan would be toast.
Patrick GallagherOctober 17, 2017
Pope Francis answers questions from journalists aboard his flight from Malmo, Sweden, to Rome Nov. 1. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)
Pope Francis confessed that while he has “chutzpah,” “I am also timid.”
Gerard O'ConnellOctober 17, 2017
Callista Gingrich, wife of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, has been nominated by President Donald Trump to be the new U.S. ambassador to the Holy See. She is pictured as her husband speaks at Peachtree Academy in Covington, Georgia, in this Feb. 29, 2012, file photo. (CNS photo/Erik S. Lesser, EPA)
23 senators voted against Ms. Gingrich’s confirmation, a departure from previous nominations that faced little opposition.
Michael J. O’LoughlinOctober 16, 2017