Another Diversity

It’s my silver anniversary. I just finished my 25th diversity workshop. Obligatory chapel has long since disappeared, but attendance at diversity training has become a command performance in faculty formation.

The workshop followed the usual grooves. PowerPoint graphs flashed the latest statistics on campus ethnic and sexual divisions. The stress on sexual orientation becomes more pronounced with each new edition. Two years ago, the president of Elmhurst College in Illinois proudly announced that his school would be the first to ask questions about sexual orientation on its admission applications.


In truth, this particular workshop was a cut above the others. The animator argued that the fundamental dynamic behind diversity differences on campus was the relationship between majority and minority. In a predominantly female student body, it is the men who feel ignored. On a predominantly Caucasian campus, people of color feel more excluded. With a majority of students nominally Catholic, non-Catholics find the campus ethos more alien. It is the power of numbers, rather than biology, that separates the insiders from the outsiders.

The omissions in our diversity sessions are striking. In the old troika of class, race and gender, class rarely makes an appearance. The gap between wealthy and poorer students has not disappeared. Clothes, cars and spending money remain sturdy tokens of status. Yet for all our attention to diversity, economic class remains submerged, as if the entire nation had suddenly become middle class. Tuition rates have consistently outrun the inflation rate, but frank discussion of the uneasy campus fusion between Neiman Marcus cardholders and Wal-Mart shoppers seems impolite.

Despite their political charge, diversity programs rarely consider political diversity. At one session, a faculty member suggested that the school should map the partisan affiliation of faculty members: Democrats, Republicans, Others, Independents. If the partisan breakdown did not match the general population’s, we might consider the factors behind this pattern of exclusion. An audible gasp broke out. The animator announced that such questions were improper and nervously launched into a discussion of diverse hobbies. (The T’ai Chi enthusiasts dominated.) Despite their penumbra of varied ethnicities and sexualities, many diversity programs seem to serve a monochrome political agenda. Robust political pluralism is unwelcome.

At the Catholic universities where I have taught, religion plays a muted role in our diversity discussions. It is crucial to understand the viewpoints of those who belong to minority religions, but the Catholic identity of the school rarely contributes to how we frame the question of diversity.

The extraordinary ethnic diversity within Catholicism itself seems to be of only modest interest in our instruction and research. The last workshop I attended was actually an exception in this regard. After discussing sexual orientation on campus, our animator remarked that negotiating the relationship between the school’s Catholic mission and questions of sexual orientation represented a challenge. The session recognized that the usual diversity concerns should be treated differently at a Catholic institution precisely because of its Catholicism.

We currently focus intensely on the question of religious identity at Catholic universities, yet when we tease out the implications of this identity for diversity and other programs, our religious mission often dissolves into the cloud of unknowing.

I just received an invitation to what will be my 26th diversity workshop in the fall. The session will certainly continue the good fight against the stubborn traces of racism, sexism and their attendant poisonous stereotypes. I hope it will transcend questions rooted in biological difference and also address questions of economic, political and religious difference through a distinctively Catholic prism. I even dream it will open out into a discussion of our diverse ideas, since the celebration and testing of such dueling ideas through rigorous debate is the very reason for the university’s existence. But I suspect that this Platonic diversity workshop is for another day.

Comments are automatically closed two weeks after an article's initial publication. See our comments policy for more.
5 years 6 months ago
Interesting situation Fr. John and very telling, your comment "We currently focus intensely on the question of religious identity at Catholic universities, yet when we tease out the implications of this identity for diversity and other programs, our religious mission often dissolves into the cloud of unknowing." It was 1983 when the Washington State Catholic Conference issued "The Prejudice Against Homosexuals and the Ministry of the Church." Among it many conclusions and recommendations it says this * "...the church is obligated to combat, as far as possible, not just manifest prejudice against gays and lesbians but also the underlying prejudicial understandings and attitudes. Jesus came not just to change the activity of persons but to bring about a conversion of heart, mind and soul as well..." * "...the church can combat the evil of prejudice against encouraging empirical research on homosexuality and the ways to combat prejudice against lesbians and gays; and by fostering ongoing theological research and criticism, with regard to its own theological tradition on homosexuality, none of which is infallibly taught." These are but snippets of that statement which has not been withdrawn. It is still in effect and stands as a challenge to all Catholic colleges and universities - we're not finished yet. The entire statement is in "Moral Dilemmas" by Richard L. Purtill. The copy may be out of print, but I got my copy through Amazon - I couldn't find my original copy so sent for this used copy. And I would encourage you to get a copy if you are to continue these much needed workshop sessions. Many blessings upon your work.
G Miller
5 years 6 months ago
What were the benefits of obligatory chapel? You never explained why this should be brought back as a practice. And how can you as a Jesuit argue for communal prayer when you don't pray the Office in community?


The latest from america

I have found that praying 15 minutes every day is an important form of self-care.
Michael R. Lovell January 16, 2019
Cardinal Donald W. Wuerl, Washington's retired archbishop, apologized Jan. 15 for what he called a "lapse of memory," clarifying that he knew of at least one abuse allegation against former U.S. Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, but he had "forgotten" about it.
Pope Francis meets with the leadership of the Chilean bishops' conference at the Vatican on Jan. 14 to talk about the sex abuse crisis affecting the church in Chile. (CNS photo/Vatican Media)
The pope wants the February summit “to be an assembly of pastors, not an academic conference—a meeting characterized by prayer and discernment, a catechetical and working gathering.”
Gerard O’ConnellJanuary 16, 2019
This week on “Inside the Vatican,” we explore the topic of women deacons.
Colleen DulleJanuary 16, 2019